All Jewish Settlements Are Legal by Int'l Law - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Joseph E .
    • 18.12.07 | 05:33 (IST)

    The "Mandate for Palestine" is valid to this day . The Mandate survived the demise of the League of Nations and is valid to this day. Article 80 of the UN Charter implicitly recognizes the "Mandate for Palestine" of the League of Nations. This Mandate granted Jews the irrevocable right to settle anywhere in Israel, the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, a right unaltered in international law and valid to this day. Jewish settlements in Judea, Samaria (i.e., the West Bank), Gaza and the whole of Jerusalem are legal. The International Court of Justice reaffirmed the meaning and validity of Article 80 in three separate cases: ICJ Advisory Opinion of July 11, 1950: in the "question concerning the International States of South West Africa." ICJ Advisory Opinion of June 21, 1971: "When the League of Nations was dissolved, ....The International Court of Justice has consistently recognized that the Mandate survived the demise of the League of Nations." ICJ Advisory Opinion of July 9, 2004: regarding the legal consequences of the construction of the wall . In other words, neither the ICJ nor the UN General Assembly can arbitrarily change the status of Jewish settlement as set forth in the "Mandate for Palestine," an international accord that has never been amended. All of Israel , from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, including the West Bank and Gaza, remains open to Jewish settlement under international law. Professor Eugene Rostow concurred with the ICJ's opinion as to the "sacredness" of trusts such as the "Mandate for Palestine": 'A trust? - as in Article 80 of the UN Charter - does not end because the trustee dies ... the Jewish right of settlement in the whole of Israel - the area west of the Jordan - survived the British withdrawal in 1948. ... They are parts of the mandate territory, now legally possessed by Israel with the consent of the Security Council." The British Mandate left intact the Jewish right to settle in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip. Explains Professor Rostow: "This right is protected by Article 80 of the United Nations Charter, which provides that unless a trusteeship agreement is agreed upon (which was not done for the Palestine Mandate), nothing in the chapter shall be construed in and of itself to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments to which members of the United Nations may respectively be parties." "The Mandates of the League of Nations have a special status in international law. They are considered to be trusts, indeed 'sacred trusts.' "Under international law, the Palestinian Arab 'people' of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have NO substantial political claim to the sovereign possession of the Jewish Lands." It is interesting to learn how Article 80 made its way into the UN Charter. Professor Rostow recalls: some of the circumstances which led to the adoption of Article 80 of the Charter. Strong Jewish delegations representing differing political tendencies within Jewry attended the San Francisco Conference in 1945. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Peter Bergson, Eliahu Elath, Professors Ben-Zion Netanayu and A. S. Yehuda, and Harry Selden were among the Jewish representatives. Their mission was to protect the Jewish right of settlement in Palestine under the mandate against erosion in a world of ambitious states. Article 80 was the result of their efforts. Build increase and develop every jewish outpost and settlements of Judea and Samaria, I'm sick and tired of people talking about land for peace, more concession for peace, more funding for peace. It's high time to tell the simple truth - the Arab world doesn?t want peace and never wanted peace with Israel. They want its destruction.

    from the article: Officials: Israel to allow construction in existing W. Bank settlements
    First published 00:00 17.12.07 | Last updated 00:00 17.12.07
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Israel's southern border in 2011.

Europeans express interest in Israeli border barriers

Amid migrant crisis, Hungary and Bulgaria inquire about design of Israel's border barriers with Egypt.

Scorched olive trees in the West Bank, 2013.

Call for 'apple intifada' elicits Palestinian protest

Non-violent anti-occupation video clip greeted by barrage of virtual rotten tomatoes on social networks.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Mission impossible? Finding Bernie Sanders' kibbutz

The Democratic presidential candidate waxes lyrical about his time spent on an Israeli kibbutz in the 1960s. But which one? Haaretz tries to find out.

Artworks, sculptures and performers are seen at 'Dismaland'

Banksy's Israeli Cinderellas

Street artist invites three Israeli artists to contribute to his dystopian theme park 'Dismaland'; Uncle Walt would not be amused.