CJ,We have a great education system here, so great, that we learn how to debate and draw our opponents in, but thanks for your concern. To start, you agree, Arabs started 67 through breaking of an Armstice and more importantly, the Jordanian attack. Annexation, happens often via war, it is UNILATERAL, if it was Bilateral or Multilateral, it would be called, CESSATION OR AMALGAMATION. It is in the definition of the word. UN Charter +GC is against Wars of Aggression NOT DEFENSIVE WARS. Law does not state no Annex, but that you can't deprive rights, there is a difference, when annex must give rights to annexed, step 2 (step 1 is sovereignty) What you have stated, with UN Security Council Rulings is subjective rulings added to Objective parameters. You have highlighted my point, notably that in INTL Law there exist subjective parameters that give claim to the objective ones. THIS IS HIGHLY DANGEROUS, and it challenges the objectivity of the law, it allows politics into Law.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Turkish soldier, 15 militants killed in clashes between security forces and Kurds (Reuters)
from the article: IDF official: Neither Israel nor PA wants violence