I'm confused. The judge defended the prosecution's contention that Kam intended to harm state security, but justified her release to house arrest because the Shin Bet did not believe that Kam posed a threat to the security of the public or state. Is it just me, or are those two statements completely contradictory?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Tunisia: 22 pounds of military explosives used in bus attack that killed 13 people (AP)
from the article: Shin Bet unable to find Anat Kam copies of secret IDF files