I'm confused. The judge defended the prosecution's contention that Kam intended to harm state security, but justified her release to house arrest because the Shin Bet did not believe that Kam posed a threat to the security of the public or state. Is it just me, or are those two statements completely contradictory?
Army: Blast in Korean DMZ wounds two South Korean soldiers (Reuters)
from the article: Shin Bet unable to find Anat Kam copies of secret IDF files