A war of choice - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Tosefta
    • 30.01.07 | 17:21 (IST)

    "Restraint following the second abduction would have been interpreted in the Middle East simply as outrageous weakness, and would have invited further challenges." - Oren A strangely silly article. Either all or nothing. What does restraint mean, doing nothing? In the past, Israel struck at Hizballah military targets after every military strike by them. We now know that the IDF had precise info on the location of middle and long-range missiles, and was able to destroy most of them (90% estimate) on the ground. This would have been a nice limited, "restrained" response to the abduction of the soldiers. There was no hope to get them back by military means anyhow! Now that Israel has chosen to go to war, what it wanted to avoid (according to Oren) came true. It lost its deterrence, as all acknowledge, while Hizballah gained more deterrence. The day after the war in Lebanon, the Syrians started mentioning their own missiles and raising the possibility of war with Israel. And Sudan got courage and told the UN it will not get into Darfur. Israel is now planning for a new war in Lebanon, perhaps an even less restrained one.

    from the article: Was it a war of choice?
    First published 00:00 30.01.07 | Last updated 00:00 30.01.07
Haaretz Headlines
Settlers and police clash in the Beit El settlement, July 29, 2015.

Demolition of illegal West Bank structures begins

Court rejects appeal to prevent demolition in Beit El; Habayit Hayehudi MK: It is the High Court that should be demolished.

Smoke billows from buildings in Quneitra

Reports: Israeli drone strikes targets in Syria

Hezbollah's Al-Manar station says two people killed in strike near Syrian town of Hadar.

Banner calling on Obama to free Jonathan Pollard

Obama won't alter terms of Pollard's parole

Convicted Israeli spy will have to remain in the U.S. for five years after his release in November.

La rivière HaYarkon

Water Authority: Teva factory behind severe pollution

Exclusive: High levels of residue from diabetes, epilepsy and depression medicines found in Tel Aviv-area waterway.