The asylum seeker, 36, cared for Kako Yamena after she was stabbed by an Israeli man in Tel Aviv, in 2014.03:54 09.02.16 | 0 comments
Suppose that this article is completely correct. How would a final peace agreement be any different or harder to revoke than the current state of affairs? Would it make it harder for Iran/Hamas to take over? A mere affirmation that it would be harder to revoke than the current internationally and Arab league backed agreements seems insufficient. Without answering these questions it seems that the projected state of affairs could just as easily be used to argue against a peace agreement. Why give tangible assets for a peace of paper which will inevitably be revoked when Hamas takes over?