hypothetical question. lets say for arguments sake that there were people on the boat who, as Israel claims, had a specific intention to attack soldiers no matter what (not self defense) who used Hamas-esque approach (cynically have combatants embedded with civilians, use low key weapons to avoid suspicion and appear innocent etc). What would it take to demonstrate that? What should be considered convincing proof? This must be pre-determined, as its too easy to brush off each piece of evidence on a case by case basis.
Knesset passes 'Norwegian Law' allowing ministers to resign their seats, remain in cabinet (Haaretz)