It is true that intermixing has led to ethnogenesis (creation of nations). It is moreover true that the Jewish people is the product of past mixtures - we are the descendants of Edumites (forcibly converted by Hamonean kings), Greco-Roman converts (before the rise of Christianity) and Germanic/Slavic domestic slaves (until early middle ages). However, the case at hand is different. Our homeland was conquered by the proponents of a highly sophisticated political-religious ideology of domination. It is called Submission (Arabic- Islam). It has an endless repertoire of techniques for domination of other groups (which, let it be made clear, does not make Muslim individuals bad or evil in any way). In the case of intermarriage, the technique for domination/submission includes three principles: 1. women are endogamous (can only marry in), men are both endogamous and exogamous (can marry both in and out). 2. patrilocality - woman always moves in with man. 3. religion is determined by the father. Therefore, any mixed marriage in Israel will invariably bring a Jewish woman into the Muslim community (she doesn't have to convert). And this union will always result in producing Muslim children. That is why Mr Shocken's idyllic examples of Jewish-Arab marriages are all of one kind - Arab man takes Jewish woman. Of course, mixed marriages should be perfectly legal, matter of individual free choice, etc. - all according to the principles of a democratic state. But we must be aware that it is a very negative phenomenon from the point of view if Jewish national interests.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Netanyahu says 'coordination, de-confliction mechanism' with Russia 'successful' (Haaretz)
from the article: The curse of Ezra