A modern look at the Bible - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '4'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '1'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 01.06.11 | 16:39 (IDT)

    I was surprised yesterday to see many objections to this post, mostly from a religious point of view. Here are a couple of principles that should guide the modern looking at the text: 1. The text we have is written by Man. 2. It reflects the situation at the time of writing. 3. It was written for some need existing at the time of writing./ Regarding my post, you don't need to believe in Abraham, but you should believe that the writer or contemporaries believed in him. Likewise for Melchizedek. I tried to make the post as little controversial as possible, so I refrained from offering a date for the texts. But obviously, they are no later than the Second Temple. My point is that already over 2 thousand years ago, our ancestors knew Jerusalem as having been ruled by Melchizedek, a non-Jew, who was respected by them. Archeology also knows of a Temple in pre-Israelite Jerusalem (to the Sun god). The Bible also does not claim that Jerusalem was started by the Jews. Now you can read the post and realize how today's nationalistic view is too modern to be respectable.

    from the article: Netanyahu: Arabs and Jews alike benefit from unified Jerusalem
    First published 13:41 01.06.11 | Last updated 13:41 01.06.11
Haaretz Headlines
Barack Obama, John Kerry and Samantha Power

The Iran deal's perilous evangelists

Obama and Kerry claim that the only alternative to the Iranian nuclear agreement is war. This is a false argument that could end up scuttling the accord.

Jewish Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) hugs a pro-Iran deal Code Pink activist in Washington D.C.

'U.S. Jews aren't united behind Israel on Iran deal'

Israel's consul general in Philadelphia sent classified telegram to Jerusalem with grave warning about sentiments in U.S. Jewish community toward Israel's campaign against nuclear deal.

Shaked Hadad

Where are Gaza's former settlers now?

Ten Israelis who were forced to leave their homes recount their often precarious existences since.

Fig and Chilean sea bass carpaccio

Edible love symbols for Israel's Valentine's Day

Before there was chocolate, there were figs, pomegranates and dates. Recipes for professing love on Tu B'Av.