Newt made a factual comment which is 100% true. the pals are a separate people if at all only from the end of WWI. They are not a nation and never had a state at any time in history. on the other hand Newt also supports a 2 state solution and is totally pragmatic about the current perceptions of the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians. He did not suggest that we "occupy" them indefinitely or that they be transferred. This whole article is a typical Burston exercise in misstating someone's position to allow him to repeat ad nauseum his own ideology.
Western-backed Syrian rebels say kill foreign Islamic State (Reuters)
from the article: Newt Gingrich may be able to occupy Palestine, but Israel can't