Haaretz: "The Palestinians can set off IEDs next to the fence, or plant landmines in case of armor and infantry forces entering Gaza in the future." That's one mighty big "or", Amos 'n' Avi... So which one was this little caper? Was it: 1) "IEDs next to the fence"? **or** was it: 2) "landmines in case of armor and infantry forces entering Gaza in the future."? I know that all the articles so far keep HINTING that it was (1), but none of them actually come out and say it. Perhaps that's because it was (2)? Remind me again what gives the IDF the "right" to attack Hamas soldiers in order to ensure that future invasion routes into Gaza are free of minefields?
Russian jets pound Islamic State in Palmyra (DPA)
from the article: Hamas footage hints at extent of group's role in Gaza clashes