First some here have immediately jumped on this and said we can't believe another word Israel says. That's fine as long as you apply the same standards to Hamas! Which recently stated they were NOT targeting civilians. How many here believe that to be true? If not then you must discount all Hamas sourced information. Second, the team arrived "days" after the building was hit, anything could have been planted by the Pals. Pictures of the bomb in the location it was found would have been helpful to determine if it was planted or not. Third, nobody was killed. It seems in a war if you cut off the food supply you weaken the enemy. So I wonder why it's a war crime? The terrorists eat the same food(as civilians)probably from the same mill as the population. I don't see how you prove it was a pre-planned target(on the target list before the war), and not added during the war? When commanders in the field decided it should be added to the target list.
At least 1,000 Israeli Arabs protest death of Palestinian infant in deadly West Bank arson (Haaretz)
from the article: Report: UN evidence counters Israel's account of Gaza war