#98; Mark of Lewiston, Actually No you didn't get it.
Mark from Georgia
29.11.09 | 19:42 (IST)
It's not the disagreements! It's the bias criticism that reveals antisemitism. When people take the situation out of context in order to bolster their false argument.
When you attack Israel for a non-violent action(building settlements)as a buffer zone to prevent attacks from the Pals, and have no comment...or excuses...for the Pals constant violations(rocket attacks, snipers,suicide bombings etc.), that's antisemitism. Period!
Why your not willing to admit it is beyond me. I certainly don't use the term lightly nor do I use use it to prevent criticism of Israel. I just think it's obviously bias, and the motivation for the bias just as obvious.
It's not the disagreements! It's the bias criticism that reveals antisemitism. When people take the situation out of context in order to bolster their false argument. When you attack Israel for a non-violent action(building settlements)as a buffer zone to prevent attacks from the Pals, and have no comment...or excuses...for the Pals constant violations(rocket attacks, snipers,suicide bombings etc.), that's antisemitism. Period! Why your not willing to admit it is beyond me. I certainly don't use the term lightly nor do I use use it to prevent criticism of Israel. I just think it's obviously bias, and the motivation for the bias just as obvious.