#84 dear mr vhardman, please pay attention - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • eric
    • 10.12.09 | 09:07 (IST)

    since you are so fixated on the british mandate of palestine and the traety of 1922, i think it's only right that you be told how badly you've misinterpreted it. clearly, the reason you're so fixed on this, and the balfour declaration which was incorporated within it, is because it states that it puts into effect the declaration made in 1917, in which the allied powers had agreed "in favor of the establishment in palestine of a national home for the jewish people"...and of course, you conveniently ignore the rest of what's said in the very same sentence; but that's not what i'm here to point out. i'm here to point out your mistaken interpretation of what is said. again vickie boy, the quote that so endears you to the mandate, with a key word capitalized for your attention: "in favor of the establishment IN palestine of a national home for the jewish people". you will note that it DOES NOT say, "in favor of the establishment OF palestine AS a national home for the jewish people". in other words vickie, it never designated ALL of palestine, only that a jewish homeland would established "within" palestine. and it was precisely the same misinterpretation as yours, widespread among zionists in palestine at the time, which lead to the clarification and amendment of goals in 1939, which is known as the "british white paper on palestine". p.s.-none of which has anything to do with the fact that the u.s. does NOT recognize the legality of ANY of israel's occupations, and is steadfastly OPPOSED to its settlement building within those occupied territories. do have a nice day, vickie.

    from the article: U.S.: Only Israel, Palestinians should decide Jerusalem's future
    First published 18:36 08.12.09 | Last updated 09:57 09.12.09
Haaretz Headlines
The scene of the Ashkelon stabbing attack, Feb. 7, 2016

Slain suspect in Ashkelon stabbing identified as Sudanese national

Soldier sustained light wounds in attack in southern city of Ashkelon; suspected assailant was shot by another soldier and later died of his wounds.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, Jan. 3, 2016.
Netanyahu seeks to oust lawmakers who meet with terrorists' families

PM vows to pursue relevant legislation after three Israeli Arab MKs visit Jerusalem terrorists' families and observe moment of silence in their honor; 'imagine if this happened in the U.K. Parliament or U.S. Congress,' Netanyahu says.

14:13 07.02.16 | 0 comments
The burned Torah books on Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016.
Unknown vandals set fire to Torah books in West Bank synagogue

Netanyahu calls on the international community to 'condemn the desecration of synagogues which is just another result of unending Palestinian incitement.'

11:20 07.02.16 | 4 comments
The signing of the Oslo Accords.
What Israelis weren't told about the alternatives to the Oslo Accords

What if almost everything we know about the lead-up to the signing of the Oslo accords is wrong? What if PM Rabin never became ‘disillusioned’ about the Washington talks that were then underway? A behind-the-scenes look at the alternatives to the Oslo track.

13:04 07.02.16 | 0 comments