68 - 'inoperative' means discarded. Not applicable. - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • r cummings
    • 04.01.10 | 23:54 (IST)

    Otiose. When Arafat confirmed for the PLO that the articles in their Covenant 'which deny Israel`s right to exist... are now inoperative', that meant THEY NO LONGER APPLY. It's a very simple issue really. The PLO charter called for the end of Israel. Likud's charter calls for the seizure and populating of the West Bank by Jews, therefore for the end of Palestine. Arafat agreed 16 years ago to drop the Pal claim. However, Likud and its far-right allies have NEVER agreed to drop the Israeli claim. Why should the PLO, having made an historic step to peace, change their charter, when the Israeli governing right is still committed to its aggressive charter? Both sides should jump in the water at the same time, surely? If the Pals are ready to change their charter, what's stopping the expansionist Jews doing likewise? This is the core question that sdhd and chums continually evade and skate around.

    from the article: Netanyahu: Change in the air over Israel-Palestinian peace talks
    First published 01:58 04.01.10 | Last updated 18:16 04.01.10
Haaretz Headlines
Former London Mayor Ken Livingstone leaves his home in London, Britain April 29, 2016.

Most Brits say hating Israel or denying its right to exist is anti-Semitism

Only 9% say criticism of Israel constitutes anti-Semitism in a poll prompted by the storm of allegedly anti-Israel, anti-Jewish statements by British Labour Party's members.

Moshe Katsav - AFP - 7.12.2011

No special treatment for rapist ex-president Katsav's clemency bid, Rivlin says

The President's Residence clarifies that a new clemency request has yet to be filed following reports that Moshe Katsav's mental state has deteriorated after a parole board refused to shorten his prison sentence.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin, February 16, 2016.

If Merkel also criticizes Israel, life is not a piece of cremeschnitte

The Israeli reaction to Der Spiegel's report on the German chancellor's frustration with Netanyahu was ridiculous, even Orwellian; as if Israelis were aliens who had just landed from another planet.

BDS pin

Boycott is the only way to stop the Israeli occupation

Aluf Benn's proposal for Israel's left to establish a base of domestic support for its positions is hopeless considering the brainwashing and increasing extremism of our society.