The almost unanimous interepretation, and indeed Caradon's interpretation was that 242 called for withdrawal in the foreseeable future from basically all the occupied territory, but omitted the 'the' in order to allow for minor mutually agreed land swaps. It did NOT allow for huge chunks of territory to be annexed. Nor did it say to Israel, you can sit in the territory and keep the Pals captive for 42 years. Therefore Israel is in breach of 242 by annexing E. Jerusalem and other land grabs. When you take into account E. Jerusalem as you must, Israel has never offered the Pals more than 91 per cent of territory captured in 1967. Obviously it is also in breach of the occupier's obligations through the settlements and attempts to change the demographics of the area.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Sanctions like those Russia imposed only deepen problem, senior Turkish official says (Reuters)
from the article: Youth protesting settlement freeze block Jerusalem entrance