One can disagree with the premise of an article hopefully with well argued reasons or even offer contadicting arguments. What we see however is a malicious and libelous distortion of an article suggesting that the responder is a demagogue of the worst kind. # 64 bold facedly avers that N.Shtrasler accuses the settlers to be the worse people in the world, that they are the cause of all Israel's problems, that they are the cause of the 'Leftists' 'killing each other' and that Shtrasler recommends 'us' to 'kill all the settlers'. I read and reread the atricle several times and nowhere does Shtrasler even remotely suggest the above. Yes, Shtrasler maintains and with plenty to support it, that the settlements cost a staggering amount of monies that could have been beneficially spent on infrastructure and the needy populace within the Green Line. People like #64 are trouble makers of the worse kind who engage in fomenting hatred and sedition.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Scalia reportedly dies at 79 (Reuters)
from the article: The ashes on the prophets' eyes