CJK: "there would still be israeli jews living in the west bank." They would be dual-citizens i.e. "Palestinian Jew" and "Israeli Jew" and as such would be entitled to two passports. CJK: "they will never, under any conditions, agree to become part of a palestinian state." Then they would be "permanent residents" living in a foreign state, rather than "citizens" of that state. So? CJK: "they will rise up for sure" Then they will be "terrorists", Cipora, and "foreign terrorists" at that. I thought you took a dim view of such scum? CJK: "such an uprising would lead to horrific bloodshed on both sides." No, it wouldn't: the slaughter would be quite one-sided because the IDF would rush to the aid of any "settler uprising". In short: you are claiming a settler power of veto over the Pals BECAUSE of fear those settlers will turn to terrorism. As arguments go it doesn't sit well with your previously-expressed views on never "surrendering to terrorism".
Several injured after Jerusalem protest march against Al-Aqsa restrictions dispersed (Haaretz)
from the article: Netanyahu seeks to foil Palestinian declaration of statehood, again