"The offers by Barak and Olmert would be termed "worthless"! Both Prime Ministers were facing decling popularity ....I would call these offers worthless!"(Said) And that's why the offers were rejected? Are you serious? Wouldn't it have made more sense to accept the offers? They had nothing to lose and everything to gain by accepting it, that is if the offer was acceptable to them. The onus would then have been on Israel to deliver. If they would, then we could have had peace by now. If they would not, then you would have the right to vilify Israel. So, could it be that the offer was NOT acceptable to Arafat/Abbas because they want even greater concessions from Israel? Why don't you say it like it is ...?
Northern California wildfire doubles in size, displaces thousands (Reuters)
from the article: Response / Henry Siegman on Burston and 'Israel's pathology'