a: "It`s right. If thre is no negotiations, the status quo will remain as it is now," What you are suggesting is that the occupying power has a vested interest in NOT negotiating in good faith, because if it can avoid a negotiated settlement to the conflict then it can sit on the land forever. That is clearly self-serving nonsense. a: "and jews will settle in the West Bank even if that is not annexed de jure" And exactly WHEN did anyone OTHER than Israel ever accept that the "status quo" allows Israeli settlement of the West Bank? Your claim involves an unwarranted leap of faith from 1) the occupation can continue indefinitely, to 2) Israel can colonize occupied territory, when 3) you cannot justify that leap.
Law expanding definition of terrorist activity passes first Knesset reading (Haaretz)
from the article: 'Settlement freeze' won't bring about peace