"Seems to me that the Israeli press is for `believers` only." He omits that the author of the 1st piece writes of the security concerns during conflicts, that "If a news outlet reports (live) immediately that a missile splashed into the sea, for example, any guerrilla with an Internet connection knows to aim left. Report that an oil refinery in Haifa went up in flames, and Hezbollah will surely celebrate and reload. Report that a senior official is headed north, and rockets will be raining down in no time." As for the 2nd piece, it is an haaretz editorial. jjvanka shouls ask them why they are freely allowing anti-Israel posts but restricting rebuttals at the talkbacks. Finally, jjvanka should ask himself - if there is absolute censorship, how did he get to post his misleading comments?
U.S. Supreme Court denies Kentucky clerk request on gay marriage licenses (Reuters)
from the article: IDF lifts censorship of Sept. 6 IAF strike on target inside Syria