"She also advocated the IDF stroll into Gaza and use force to stop the Muslim hysteria. Would you condemn that? Of course you would."
No, I would not. The IDF is the Occupying Power, and it has obligations as the Occupying Power.
Including the obligation to maintain law and order. The IDF "withdrawal" was a sham, designed specifically to leave behind an overcrowded ghetto.
This is the result. It is the result of an Occupying Power abrogating its responsibilities under the 4th GC.
The IDF has to go back in and maintain order, and if that proves costly for the IDF and proves unpopular with the Israeli piublic, well, tough, because Israel should never have undertaken a UNILATERAL withdrawal.
You misread me because you have a typical zionist mindset; what *we* want is what is important, and if decisions have to be made then we'll do it by talking *among* *ourselves*.
You can't pretend that your obligations doesn't exist simply because they are onerous.
"She also advocated the IDF stroll into Gaza and use force to stop the Muslim hysteria. Would you condemn that? Of course you would." No, I would not. The IDF is the Occupying Power, and it has obligations as the Occupying Power. Including the obligation to maintain law and order. The IDF "withdrawal" was a sham, designed specifically to leave behind an overcrowded ghetto. This is the result. It is the result of an Occupying Power abrogating its responsibilities under the 4th GC. The IDF has to go back in and maintain order, and if that proves costly for the IDF and proves unpopular with the Israeli piublic, well, tough, because Israel should never have undertaken a UNILATERAL withdrawal. You misread me because you have a typical zionist mindset; what *we* want is what is important, and if decisions have to be made then we'll do it by talking *among* *ourselves*. You can't pretend that your obligations doesn't exist simply because they are onerous.