When in the world, when someone points out the many existing Israeli violations of international law, UN resolutions, articles of the 4th Geneva Convention, a ruling by the International Court of Justice of the illegality of the separation wall, you refer to expired international conferences, as if they were relevant? You have done this before, as if you have not been told several times that San Remo, Balfour and the British Mandate have all expired. UN resolutions 242 and 338 are not illegal, as you know, and they are still extant. But israel is in violation of them. Try hard to learn the difference between the words "illegal," and "expired." Perhaps a tutor could help.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Prominent East Jerusalem lawyer arrested on suspicion of Facebook incitement (Haaretz)
from the article: U.S.: Israel plan to build in East Jerusalem harms peace process