In past years, Israel argued that the 67 border was not a border at all, but a ceasefire line. She also argued that the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem were not "occupied" but "disputed" territories, which gave it a free hand to settle these territories at will. On that basis, it follows that the entire land of pre-67 Palestine/Israel, because any borders that existed were not borders but ceasefire lines. So instead of focusing on 67 borders, why not take a look at the entire cake and divide it up according to the population needs of both parties? That would seem eminently more sensible.
- 10:41 PM