SDHD: "If they`re looking into it, they`re looking into it" **Sigh** Steve berated Hass for not getting the other side of the story about the IDF beating up a Palestinian. Yet I point out that Hass TWICE approached the IDF for their side of the story, and was TWICE given the brush-off, which means that Steve's complaint was a nonsense. SDHD: "Before letting anyone know the facts, they must ascertain them." **sigh** That is irrelevent to Steve's initial complaint (Hass didn't attempt to get both sides) and my reply (Hass did indeed make two attempts). The reasons WHY the IDF rebuffed her is irrelevent to my point i.e. 1) Hass did approach them for comment (twice), 2) comment was refused (twice), and so 3) Steve's argument is a nonsense.
Australian police arrest 5 over shooting 'linked to terrorism' (Reuters)
from the article: Settlers' call sends Palestinian shepherd to IDF beating