Notice that I DIDN'T say that having them (a third party) is bad. ...Even having a forth or fifth party is good...if/when it's required (keep stability in mind here). I said that NOW is not the time! Would they not have been able to issue this challenge...after the Summit? Who/what would have stopped them? Why become a source of division BEFORE the summit? And-- I said that choosing this time to do this...is indicative of the CHARACTER/NATURE of this group! If they ever wind up in power, would they want/appreciate this happening around a time like this? It Shows-- A lack of vision/foresight & character...if not arrogance. A Similar Arrogance-- To what Hamas had. The Real Problem Is External-- Only so much can be done/promised by ANY party! "Trust Me"-- Americans/Westerners who support the Palestinians...aren't fighting to end your occupation from Israel...to see you under occupation from someone else. ...This applies to both men & women.
Saudi FM: We hope Iran uses sanction relief for development, not nefarious activities (Reuters)
from the article: Palestinian billionaire launches movement to rival Fatah, Hamas