Three points of dissent, including whether Israel will be able to control the broadcast and where the cameras will be situated, could lead to new tensions over flashpoint site.04:55 07.02.16 | 0 comments
This one's even steaming! "It continues to legitimize the PA by saying that it won`t deal with the PA while Hamas won`t accept the key points demanded." Notice the word-games being yapped out: "legitimize" - what, the PA was ever an ILLEGITIMATE authority? When did that happen, puppy? Coz the PA was "legitimized" when the Olso Accords were signed in '93 Here's another little yappy-trick: "it won`t deal with the PA" - and what is the nature of the "dealings" between the PA and the UN? Why, the puppy doesn't say. So let me tell you: since '93 the PA has been provided local security, social welfare and infrastructure, and the UN has been providing aid money to enable it to carry out those responsibilites. When Hamas got voted in the UN cut off that aid. That's it, puppy. That's the extent of "the deal" the UN had with the PA. So sad, of course, but the Yapster never lets facts get in the way of a good, hard, YAP! YAP! Coz, of course, he's a pompous nitwit.