...Saying. "Israel could [...] claim that East Jerusalem is a Jewish city and that Arabs have no right to settle there." (Tim R) "Exactly what Israel DOES claim ..."(Zeev) Still avoiding the issue, eh Zeev? But unlike the Arabs in 1948 who ethnically cleansed East Jerusalem of Jews, Israel did NOT ethnically cleanse Arabs from East Jerusalem after 1967. Arabs are still allowed to live there yet Arabs are still objecting to Jews settling in East Jerusalem because despite history, they still claim that it should be an exclusively Arab city ? ?Honesty In Debating Is Debating My Central argument, which is - remember? : "Who was majority in any place for any time before any day?(Zeev) No Zeev, that?s NOT what we were debating. We were debating your assertion that Israel?s settlement policy is the impediment to peace. And I reminded you why Israel DID/DOES have the right to at least some of the settlements irrespective of what your politicized (and corrupt) UN claims to be international law. Once again (rehearse it please Zeev) any so called law which is arbitrary and is not exercised equally to ALL is NOT really law. It is just the political will of the ruling class or the would be ruling class which in the case of Israel AND Serbia is the powerful coalition of Arab/Muslim nations who force their will on other nations by the politics of fear and oil ?
UN human rights office 'deeply disturbed' by Libya death sentences (Reuters)
from the article: Fear of peace will be the death of Israel