SDHD: "It could also prove that the bomb was placed there." In which case it would have been found amongst 120mm tank artillery fragments because, of course, if you handwave away the evidence of an airstrike then you are left with tank artillery fire as your explanation. So where are the 120mm tank shell fragments, SDHD? A team of UN munitions experts entered that building, and they didn't find any..... Your argument faces that fundamental problem i.e. if 500 pound Mk82 bombs DIDN'T knock down that mill then you are left with "evaporating tank shells" and, so sorry, "120mm evaporating tank shells" don't actually exist. If the mill had been demolished by tank-fire then the UN team would have reported finding "lots of 120mm tank shell fragments and, oh yeah, one 500 pound UXB". They. Did. Not. Your. Argument. Stinks.
244 arrested in Southern California immigration sting (AP)
from the article: Report: UN evidence counters Israel's account of Gaza war