According to report in Germany's Stern magazine, unnamed Israeli agency warned German intel of planned attack the day before the game, which was to be held four days after the Paris attacks.18:09 25.11.15 | 0 comments
"the fact remains that the court exceeded its authority by assuming a-priori that it knew where the border is which can only be decided today by a bilateral agreement between Israel and the PA." A couple of points of order here: 1) The court itself examined its jurisdictional and authoritative limits, and it says that you are quite wrong. 2) You are wrong about the current state of borders; the border between Israeli and non-Israeli land IS known. It's the Green Line. The bilateral agreement YOU hypothesise would be an agreement to MOVE the existing line separating Israeli from non-Israeli land. Which means you have it backwards - you claim the ICJ is prejudicing the outcome of those talks (Israel tried that same claim in a submission - the ICJ rejected it), whereas the ICJ is adament that it is the *WALL* that attempts to prejudice those talks. The ICJ opinion reads a lot more like reality than your opinion.