Interesting article, but Durson makes all wrong conclusions. In the near future the term civilian population will be totally dismissed as irrelevent. And nobody will care about how much damage will the future bring if the persuit of terrorists inflicts unbearable damage to the supporting terrorism populations. As the saing goes: the more supporting terrorism population suffers the better. You Dusrson will never understand, that there is no such a thing that military victory is not achiavable against terrorism. There no such a thing in nature, not what so ever. Just the opposite is true. And the only thing what is preventing the military's total victory is a b/s desire to be politically correct and abide by outlived Geneva conventions. The 9/11 event was the first awakening and God forbid the next terror attrocity on similar scale will spell the death to all b/s, political correctness and for sure that garbage called Geneva conventions which only civilized countries need to abide by.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
At least three injured in shooting near abortion clinic in Colorado (Reuters)
from the article: Who deters whom?