• Published 09:48 26.07.10
  • Latest update 09:48 26.07.10

Oliver Stone: Jewish control of the media is preventing free Holocaust debate

Outspoken Hollywood director says new film aims to put Adolf Hitler, who he has called an 'easy scapegoat' in the past, in his due historical context.

By Haaretz Service Tags: Israel news Holocaust Adolf Hitler US Jews

Jewish control of the media is preventing an open discussion of the Holocaust, prominent Hollywood director Oliver Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that the U.S. Jewish lobby was controlling Washington's foreign policy for years.

Oliver Stone

Oliver Stone

Photo by: AP

In the Sunday interview, Stone reportedly said U.S. public opinion was focused on the Holocaust as a result of the "Jewish domination of the media," adding that an upcoming film of him aims to put Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin "in context."

"There's a major lobby in the United States," Stone said, adding that "they are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington."

The famed Hollywood director of such films as Platoon and JFK, also said that while "Hitler was a Frankenstein," there was also a "Dr Frankenstein."

"German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support," Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that "Hitler did far more damage to the Russians than the Jewish people, 25 or 30 [million killed]."

Referring to the alleged influence of the powerful Jewish lobby on U.S. foreign policy, Stone said that Israel had distorted "United States foreign policy for years," adding he felt U.S. policy toward Iran was "horrible."

"Iran isn't necessarily the good guy," Stone said, insisting that Americans did not "know the full story."

Stone's comments to the Sunday times echo previous remarks by the Hollywood director, regarding what he perceives as the distorted view of figures such as Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin in U.S. media.

Earlier this year, Stone, speaking at the at the Television Critics Association's semi-annual press tour in Pasadena said that "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply."

"He's the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect ... People in America don't know the connection between World War I and World War II, Stone said adding that through his documentary work he has been able to "walk in Stalin's shoes and Hitler's shoes to understand their point of view."

"We're going to educate our minds and liberalize them and broaden them. We want to move beyond opinions ... Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM. Hitler is just a man who could have easily been assassinated," Stone said.

  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend
  • Comments
  • Share
  • Text Size +|-
TalkBacks

Why Facebook Connect?

Comment on Haaretz.com articles with your Facebook login, and share your thoughts on your own wall.

Add a comment

Add your reply

  • 149. 47 1
    hitler
    • yuval
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:56

    Hitler did not kill millions of Jews by himself. in fact with his own hands, he killed none, but he is still responsible , along with his early supporters of genocide. BTW, who were (one of) his first and most ardent supporters??? the German Zionists!!!!!!

  • 148. 80 5
    God Bless Oliver Stone
    • Raymond
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:55

    The man speaks the truth.

  • 147. 0 1
    #102 Try taking a poll of the IDF and ask a similar question of the Pals.
    • Larry
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:55

    Would they go fight to free Palestinians from oppression? Your rant about something done in 1941 is highly suspect. To top it off, MSNBC isn't exactly a news source then a "rant" channel. It's very easy to retitle your rant as "Let us also remember that the Germans of the 30's were very much the same as today's Israeli's".

  • 146. 0 0
    Not strictly pertinent but for those with doubts..
    • io
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:53

    .. please see this: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/video/flv/generic.html?s=frol02n3d05qe4b and other videos online.

  • 145. 55 2
    Did any other people die during wwII?
    • NEWBORN Jew
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:51

    I have been made to believe that only 6 million Jews were killed during war.But I'm just getting to know that over 30 million Russians wre also killed.Incredulous!thanks Oliver Stone

  • 144. 1 0
    Mr Stone
    • Frank Martino
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:49

    Like a dentist hitting an exposed nerve. Nothing to hide? Then drag it out into the sun. And shall we look at the destruction of Russia in WW1 AND

  • 143. 1 1
    Let me see if I get Stone's point
    • pt
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:46

    Stone himself says that Hitler killed 25-30 milliion Russians. He then says that Hitler is a scapegoat and needs to be understood. Is this a guy you sounds like he's given much lucid thought to this.

  • 142. 3 6
    numbers in context…
    • ben
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:43

    Look at the amount of Jews to Russians Pre WWII you have 168 million people in Russia and you have 13.3 million Jews in the whole world... Now there were 6 million Jews killed and around 23.9 million Russians killed; of which half were in the military... so that means the total percentage of Russians dead was 14.4 percent and even less when you remove military deaths... but take 6 and divide it by 13.3 and you have 45 percent of the worlds Jewry dead... the difference is the Russians had a army made to defend them... and the Jews had an army designed by the Nazi's SOLELY to kill them...

  • 141. 4 2
    he is right
    • David
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:38

    How come one cannot say such things, which are true and proven (eg number of dead) without being immediately attacked by the lobby ?

  • 140. 4 2
    Stone---Psuedo Intellectual Moron !!!!!
    • Don Rosenberg
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:34

    This man should move to cuba or iran, he is so smart ,he is stupid. Just because gentiles do not care to force people to remember the Holocaust, stone wants to minimize it and what happened to Jews. Most gentiles or russians do not even know how many died in WW2, which means they don't care like Jews care. Jews were targeted to be wiped out, the russians were not. Plus most russians, polocks and other gentiles turned on their Jewish populations .

  • 139. 2 0
    Scary Oliver
    • Eduardo Afonso - Curitiba
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:34

    If you justifiy Hitler attitude in relation to Jews, searching historical reasons for that, there is no word to qualify you, but antisemite. Hitler was not a normal dictator like Castro, Kim il Sung or Ahmedinejad. No historical reason can justify what he did. There is a big difference in killing Jews, gays, gypsis, on one side, and civilians of an enemy state on the other side. None is justified but on the second case you can search for the historical reasons for that. Not the first one. Killing German Jews, for instance, is a pure and complete manifestation of antisemitism and try to justify that makes you a antisemite. It´s scary that a personality like Stone opens this debate and receives such a number of enthusiasts. The Holocaust has nothing to do with Israel. Most of those who died were not Zionists. They never endorsed the Yishuv. They prefered to be citizens of their countries. If Stone cretated this debate because of the hate for Israel, in the end, he is contributing to stenghten the idea of Israel as a safe haven for Jews since Jews in the diaspora continue to be demonized. The numers of the Holocaust were not given by Jews,nor Americans, but by the statistics of cities before and after the war. It´s simple mathematics whose numbers were provided by burocrats in Poland, Germany, Greece. No other event in History has been more studied than the Holocaust. The sources are open to everyone to discuss it. If Stone claim the US cannot discuss it, why the former USRR or the European countries - according to Stone, not subjected by Jewish lobbies - all confirm the numbers currently accepted of 6 million? Oliver Stone is more antisemite, a person desperately needing for fame and a debate to promote himself. In the end, he is kinda of a criminarl for lending his reputation to this disgusting debate.

  • 138. 10 0
    Stone's father was Jewish
    • CMH, Baltimore
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:19

    Don't call him an anti-semite when he has Jewish ancestry himself, unless you want to perpetuate the self-loathing Jew stereotype. He isn't glorifying Hitler or Stalin here, all he is doing is asking questions about WWII history that everyone takes for granted. By smearing him, you prove his point! No open discussion on the Holocaust is allowed!

  • 137. 2 4
    shame on haaretz
    • judah ben hur
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:13

    its not like haaretz NEEDS to report on every move every jew hater makes....let stone do what he wants...hes washed up anyhow...it doesnt mean haaretz has to give him a public platform.....and IF they choose to run such a ridiculous story, why not turn off the talkback on this one? it only promotes division and hate....its completely unecessary. for a news group that is on the left, it sure is strange how they attempt to promote peace. If you ask me, it just shows how bitter and lonely the left in israel is. This is a cry for attention...nothing more and waaaay below the standards haaretz once had....kinda reminds me of the new york times....another has been leftist newsgroup.

  • 136. 3 3
    Hegel's Bagels
    • W.D.Whitten
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:13

    A lot of complaining and dissing Stone by those who know nothing of real history. In my experience an "antisemite" is not someone who hates Jews, it is someone who the Jews hate. Oh you darling victimoids.

  • 135. 2 0
    Oliver Stone and President Chavez
    • ronniewinch
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:11

    A perfect fit for Anti Semites of the year. Stones next movie will no doubt star Mel Gibson...

  • 134. 3 2
    Stone is Anti American and anti Jewish
    • Sami / USA
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:03

    Stone is both anti American and anti Jewish. A fan of Chjavez also.

  • 133. 11 0
    Facts are anti-semitic
    • PeteMoylan
    • 27.07.10
    • 00:00

    It's not so much that jews don't admit to controlling the media. They just don't like it when someone has something NEGATIVE to say about it. If Oliver Stone was praising the Jews of Hollywood then everything would be fine.

  • 132. 1 4
    Oiver stone
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:56

    What did the Jews ever do to you for you to have such vile thoughts. The hatred in you must goback many years probably since childhood when you were taught the famous 4 gospels.

  • 131. 6 3
    Oliver Stone and Jewish Media
    • TheProudGoyim
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:51

    Good for him. Now le's see the Jewish media try to destroy him because these are fighting words to these Zionist meatheads. They, the Zionist media, have so many lies and falsehoods about the holocaust to defend it will make their heads spin trying to stop all the truths that come out do to open debate. Good for Oliver Stone.

  • 130. 3 0
    Look for tapes of Stone rants!!
    • spyderhead
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:36

    Now that he has ticked off the Zionist owners of ALL US media, look for a deluge of Oliver Stone rants of hatred against blacks, Jews, little fuzzy kittens . . . anything. You do NOT go messing with those crazed Zionists with their racist real-estate agent YHWH!!

  • 129. 1 2
    Stone's Remarks
    • Anthony L. Bellotte
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:29

    Stone's remarks above show a very confused mind. His thoughts are incomplete and ignorant. Hitler did not kill 20 million Russians, Stalin did. He marched them across mine fields, into machine guns and heavy artillery fire just so he could be first in Berlin. Had he just been patient he could have save millions of his people and still have accomplished the same thing. As for domination of the press, The US press has many masters and most on them are non-Jewish. See how much press the Jews get over Obama and his Muslim friends. Give me a break Stone. You're a jerk looking for press on your new movie - admit it.

  • 128. 2 1
    i knew this comparison was coming. the 25-30 million russians
    • steve-nyc
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:24

    were killed primarily in combat or, starved in prisoner of war camps or revenge for partisan, guerrilla attacks, like my Polish relatives who fought with the Polish partisans and then went to Israel and the US. Had Hitler won Russians as Slavs would have been slave labor. Lets face it the Russian military strategy in both ww1 and ww2, until they fell back to the URALS was to throw masses of soldiers in virtual suicide attacks against a highly mechanized Nazi force. The Jews were to have another fate: the complete extermination of every Jew on the face of the earth. No other group was so marked for destruction as part of a states policy but the Jews. that's what makes the Holocaust the Holocaust and the most memorable part of WW2. in fact at the end of the war Hitler diverted vital resources to keep the death camps going, it became the only policy still enforced by the Nazi regime, even though the war was lost. to sum it up: Had Hitler won , there would have been Russians in the world as slaves, but not one Jew alive on the entire planet

  • 127. 0 0
    Oliver Stone
    • Open Ear
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:22

    Wait until his documentary comes out. Watch it and make a decision based on the facts or lack there of. Putting the cart before the horse and chastising the man based on personal fear and uncertainty is foolish.

  • 126. 0 0
    oliver stone
    • jason
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:17

    the only factory that was nerver bombed by the allies the ford motor factory .

  • 125. 0 0
    Oliver with a "twist"
    • Rachel
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:07

    Wow. Sounds like this Oliver's tale will indeed have an interesting twist. And Mr. Stone's directorial prowess leaves much to be anticipated. Am interested to see who will be the vagabond-by-circumstance and the victim in this production. Of course, there was no High Priest in Oliver Twist, so the little boy escaped a social holocaust. But we must always keep in mind: sympathy for the scapegoat has never stopped the High Priest from putting it on the alter.

  • 124. 0 0
    Whats up with...
    • J
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:06

    reading an israeli newspaper then making anti semetic comments? Wouldn;'t you feel more at home on youtube or something?

  • 123. 1 0
    Steve # 90
    • Patricia Ann Abraham
    • 26.07.10
    • 23:04

    I am certainly NOT denying the Holocaust. What I am saying is that it is time of 'context' to be provided. Isn't that always one of Israel's complaints about criticism: that 'context' is NOT provided? Shoe's on the other foot baby!

  • 122. 2 1
    Two birds with one stone
    • Colin Wright
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:59

    Oliver Stone and the Israel lobby do each other as much harm as possible. Pass the popcorn.

  • 121. 1 0
    holocaust
    • zoe
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:55

    well nazis acted because of the indifference of all countries.who were happy that someone did what they did not dare to do. but , no one knows better than jews what happened and no one can compare the jewish percecution and suffering to any of the palestinians difficult situation. they have all arabs to take care of them (If they really care) Jews were alone as always . the 6.000.000 souls who perished in the holocaust did not have weapons , not even stones.they did not have un or activists to fight for them. they died and with them gone went our childhood and all is left is the will to fight for our existence , no matter what our ennenies say. they have invented a new way of fighting us , and is called antizionism, antiisrael. but we say to them:AM ISRAEL HAI!

  • 120. 2 0
    Hollywood is becoming mad
    • Erena
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:53

    First Mel Gibson, now Oliver Stone.... I think they just have nothing better to do. No new excitement and they are just used to lots of attention.... Wackos

  • 119. 0 0
    Oliver Stone
    • Hank
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:52

    I saw Stone on HBO w/ Bill Maher. They are both are half-Jews, both liberals, but what is the difference in seeing the Jewish life. Maher is the defender of Jewish couse, and Stone is accusing Jews in all World problems. It is idiotic to compare WWII loses: Jews lost 30% of their population and Russians only 10% (including 2 millions Jews). Even Germans lost 15%. I do not beleive Stone is anti-Semite. I think he is not very itnellengent and just trying hard to show his liberal veiw, so nobody accuse him of being Jew sympatazer.

  • 118. 0 2
    Israel loves a hollywood story
    • Natallie Durson
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:49

    Jewish money has been behind many if not most of Hollywoods biggest productions. They gave us Charlton Heston as Moses, George C Scott as Abraham, and Paul Newman as a zionist aboard the Exodus. These were Hollywoods biggest stars at the time, and this is just scratching the surface. This is what money can buy. Israel is not used to Hollywood types going against the pro-Israel flow. It is interesting for its rarity. We had Mel Gibson and now Oliver Stone. Neither one is a true Hollywood insider, but both are huge in that small town. Still, I doubt that they are as disappointing to Israel as is Woody Allen. He made a a bunch of the most wonderful, most memorable movies ever to grace the small screen. His movies were awash with his Jewish heritage, history, and culture (as found in NYC), and yet he never gave a nod to Israel or to Israeli politics, or to Israeli propaganda. Woody Allen had his reasons for the things he did and did not do, same as Gibson and Stone. All should be taken in their complete context and not just as a target in a Jewish smear campaign.

  • 117. 0 0
    It doesn't matter...
    • Catarin
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:31

    what formed Hitler's and Stalin's views. They killed millions of people while they were in power, primarily to secure and keep their positions of authority. Compare them to Churchill and Roosevelt. I now understand how the circumstances of WW I affected WW II but the Germans were the aggressors in both cases. What Stalin did to the Russians--I don't think they've yet recovered.

  • 116. 0 0
    oliver stone
    • Bernice G
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:30

    The man is an idiot. I refuse to dignify his inane ravings beyond asking is he a twin of mel gibson?

  • 115. 2 1
    some well known FACTS
    • judah ben hur
    • 26.07.10
    • 22:02

    Everyone who has SERIOUSLY taken the time to STUDY this sad chapter in germany's history, knows full well that many non german players took part in this sickness. IBM, Prescott Bush, the fords, the swiss...and on and on...but the germans, with their meticulous records really have left nothing to be researched. It's all been researched over and over....the fact is,millions were killed, by gassing,shooting, starving, torture etc...whatever ibm's role and others is not irrelevant, but another discussion. The FACTS remain that 6 million jews were systematically killed in a state wide enterprise that included all areas of government, from the medical department, to the judiciary, labour, transport, and on and on....all documented by the germans themselves! yes russians were killed, yes gypsies were killed, yes homosexuals(which iran does not have..lol) were killed...and not one jew has ever diminished all of the other people that were killed...but the fact remains, 6 million jews were killed and they were wholy different in how they were treated than all other groups....reserach the wannsee conference...research IG Farben.....go on....stop listening to idiots like stone and ahmedinejad for their efforts to delegitimize jews....it is a disgrace and ANYONE who subscribes to their theories are just plane naked jew haters....nothing more.

  • 114. 0 0
    Stone’s Platoon-type scenario on HRW and AI in their context
    • Egon B.E. Friberger, Brussels, Belgium
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:43

    Stone’s Platoon-type scenario on HRW and AI in their context Why is Mr. Oliver Stone not making Platoon-like movies about the practices of Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other neo-Übermensch organizations. Instead of representing like primitive animals those thoroughly selected and intensively trained citizens who as soldiers risk their lives and master their private interests and opinions to achieve democratic goals within usually an uncomfortable context, WHY does he not come out with as spectacularly degrading scenarios about these without any professional or transparent selection and even shielded from any democratic supervision. Are they possibly Übermensch with moral and intellectual superiority to any other inferior human being, especially soldiers and anyone else with a diverging opinion.

  • 113. 1 0
    He has a point, although not the one intended
    • Israeli
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:40

    It is very convenient for Europe to put all the blame on the Holocaust on Nazi racism. First the "racism" purifies the European churches which (in contrast with the churches in the U.S.A.) promoted the idea that Jews - and not the Romans - killed Jesus. Second, the Nazi regime is also very convenient in letting all forget that virtually all Europe knew and took part. It also permitted to ride on the "German economy horse" up to this day: "you Germans better work for us if you want to be reenter in the community of nations". It is also convenient for the Israeli left-wing who tells us that "there was never real antisemitism, there was only racism, and today people are only against the occupation, not against Jews". The point is that the Holocaust was not only the wish of the Nazis, and not only the wish of Germany, but the wish of all Christian Europe.

  • 112. 2 0
    Russians, Nazis, Hitler
    • Stan
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:29

    "Russians suffered more from the Nazi's" A nation of 120 + million individuals lost nearly 30 million. The Jews of Europe numbered barely 15 million, of which 6 million were killed. Percentages are what matter, not numbers. Another point is that Russians died at the hands of Stalin during the war with his strategy of "keep the men coming" At one point the German high command would describe Russian attacks on the Eastern Front as a "masses of bodies, some barely armed, some barely clothed, running at our lines to be killed like dogs - only to be killed by their commanders for turning back."

  • 111. 1 0
    That guy Stone
    • salomon
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:27

    What else could be expected from an "intelectual deviate" like this guy? Unfortunately, this time Stone outdid himself. Poor Hitler, just a victim of American thirst for money being his thesis. How low can a movie-maker fall?

  • 110. 1 0
    Okay...
    • Yosemite
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:17

    So is this Oliver Stone's version of the Passion? Mel Gibson made a billion dollars baiting the Jews all over the World. So maybe Stone thinks baiting the United States will do the same thing?

  • 109. 1 0
    Oliver Stone / WWII and Russians
    • Alex NYC / Ukraine
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:15

    The entire Soviet Union fought a war against Nazi Germany. If we talk about the war, yes, there are many millions of ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians and others killed (including 200,000 Russian Jewish soldiers). If we talk about the genoicide, well, then yes, Jews and Gypsies were the victims. It is also true that Russians, Ukrainians and Belorussians were on a path to be victims of Nazi genocide when Nazi Germany would have been done with its Jewish and Gypsy victims. But of course, this famed filmmaker has been high up on drugs for the last 2 decades and therefore his inflammatory comments and friendship with other paranoid schizophrenics like Chavez.

  • 108. 0 1
    Stone, Jewish conspiracies and the hypocrites of “free debate”
    • Egon B.E. Friberger, Brussels, Belgium
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:07

    The freedom of those crying hyena about free debate and freedom of opinion is the “freedom” to share their rigid opinions, remarkably all anti-Semitic. More or less like the “humanism” in the DDR. As soon as, in defence of advanced democratic economies, you come up with a striking argument that dustifies – I repeat “dustifies” - such rigid, systemically skewed opinions, you have for the rest of your life to face outright fascistoid practices and human booby traps wherever you go, in any shop, on any tramway, in every street, in every residence, at every conference. And technical censure. No to mention the Nazi-type concept of a Jewish media conspiracy. Oh, his name is Stone, Oliver Stone.

  • 107. 0 0
    Oliver Stone
    • ike
    • 26.07.10
    • 21:00

    Some think he's a lunatic. Some think he's a far left liberal. Same thing, their both right!

  • 106. 0 0
    Oliver Stone / Mel Gibson
    • Glenn
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:54

    Same ilk !

  • 105. 0 0
    Actually, he was kind of hard to assassinate
    • Colin Wright
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:54

    There were at least three well-planned attempts. None of them worked.

  • 104. 160 0
    Mr. Hitler shows up and...
    • Lucy, Naples, Florida
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:51

    Nobody convinces me that Mr. Hitler shows up one day and convinces 80 million Germans plus some additional several million Europeans to wipe out 6 million Jews just like that. Especially since these murdered were not only Jews but Jewish co- citizens and neighbors. There is nothing wrong, in my opinion, to analyze and demonstrate the events which led to this horror. It will not diminish the suffering caused nor diminish the responsibility of the present German generations (not that they ever ran away from it) but it will show how such evil can occur by means of propaganda, economic hardship, controlled media and internal violence. Let’s not forget that the good old USA was sold on a war in Iraq on false pretenses, despite a free news media and internet. So, let’s not forget but let’s understand and do something about it. Enough stuff has happened since and is happening today.

    • 0 0
      Exellent post Judy.
      • SJ
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:25

      But, us humans do not learn from history....we should, but don´t.

    • 0 0
      well said
      • al-kafir al-yahudi
      • 26.07.10
      • 22:22

      I agree with your statement. However, Holocaust "debate" is usually a euphemism for "it never happened". At this point in time, it is stupid to deny the Holocaust. It would be like questioning the existence of slavery in the US. If I were to do that, would not the Black Lobby (and everyone else) come down on me and prevent further "debate"? I could hem and haw about the oppression of free speech, but in the end, I'd be the one in the wrong. If the Holocaust was truly funded by external (non-German) forces, then that should be investigated. However, given the history of Jews in Europe, it is NOT unbelievable that the Jews of Germany were targeted by an xenophobic group.

    • 1 0
      you are right it only took 5 years. by 1938-39, the policy was in
      • steve-nyc
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:30

      place. the Problem the Germans had, most of the 80million and their counter parts in other Euro countries, is that they couldn't kill fast enough until the final solution in 1941-42. But how and why they did it is documented in millions of words in every langyage

    • 0 0
      responsibility of the present German generations
      • Cogito man
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:15

      For what may I ask? If there are any Germans alive today who did participate in the crimes of WWII they are old and senile and not able to influence anything. May I ask for HOW LONG and WHY Germans will be held "responsible"?

  • 103. 72 71
    Just for a Minute let's talk Art
    • H
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:49

    Oliver Stone can't do it. He couldn't do JFK and he couldn't do Vietnam. Hirschbiegel did Der Untergang and he produced a Masterpiece. It took Germans, speaking German to pull it off. Stone isn't Coppola, he's not even very good. This is all PR to get bums on seats. He may make a fortune from the eager punters but he'll never be a Contender like Bergman, Polanski, Bunuel, Spielberg, Huston, Eisenstein or Tarkovsky

    • 0 0
      Exactly
      • Jason
      • 26.07.10
      • 22:41

      Hitler was an evil man and the Jews (and many other groups) were victims of his evil ideology. However, I do think it would be fascinating to see a film that examined the "historical context" of World War II, including the effect of the World War I peace treaties and how they helped to create a vacuum that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party (and so on.) - but Oliver Stone just doesn't have the talent for such a rigorous task. And his "it's all the fault of the Jews" thing is just stupid. Maybe, someday, a genuinely intelligent, talented filmmaker will come along and attempt to do such a thing ("The White Ribbon" was an excellent film exploring some of the factors that may have helped lead to the rise of the Nazi party - but it's focus is rather different than what Stone seems to be suggesting here.)

    • 0 0
      o rly?
      • Paul
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:21

      Spielberg shouldn't be compared to the others, he was just a technician.

  • 102. 87 1
    Let us also remember that the Germans of the 30s were very much the same as Americans
    • Sam
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:48

    in their anti-semitic views. A poll conducted of US soldiers in 1941 (recently mention on MSNBC in relations to gays in the military) had that 84 percent of soldiers believed (american) that there was nothing good about the jews. You would think these were german soldiers, but when you look at the segregated and no jews allowed environment that they came from it should be no surprise. But let us not full ourselves, ww2 had nothing to do with jews, but the British, American and ultimately, Russian interests being threatened by Hitler, had the war been to save the Jews, I dare say that not one American would enlist, such were the times in the US.

    • 0 1
      you are quite right old chap
      • Bruno
      • 26.07.10
      • 22:48

      world war 2 had nothing to do with freeing people from camps - most american, british or russians who fought in that war were no less racist as the Germans of the time -

    • 1 1
      We still won't
      • Nick
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:23

      Cause you won't release ALL the flotilla footage and evidence to show whether or not you are guilty. Coming down harsh on Cast Lead, will not ease the pain for what you did this time as well to a third party, Turkey (a former ally).

    • 0 1
      We still won't
      • Nick
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:23

      Cause you won't release ALL the flotilla footage and evidence to show whether or not you are guilty. Coming down harsh on Cast Lead, will not ease the pain for what you did this time as well to a third party, Turkey (a former ally).

  • 101. 158 74
    The Holocaust has Never Been Properly Researched
    • Bernie
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:47

    The fact that World War 2 was a tragedy, that had a terrible impact, on people all over the world, but especially Jews, Russians, Chinese, Japanese and Germans ... is fairly well known. But there are 'facts' that are totally in dispute. For example, taking the Jewish population in Europe in 1935, then subtracting the Jewish population in Europe, in 1945 ... and saying that therefore Hitler killed 6 million Jews, is a huge leap. There is no question that many Jews died in the camps, but what about Russians? Did more Jews or Russians get exterminated? These are things that have never been researched. The Russians suffered greatly in the camps and on the battlefield. But the way it has been portrayed, the uneducated would believe that Stalin and Hitler allied to kill Jews ... Because objective research of the holocaust has been impossible in America.

    • 1 1
      Another nonsensical post
      • McQueen
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:22

      No one is preventing any "objective" research into the Holocaust. It is done all the time. Moreover I have never heard that Stalin and Hitler allied to kill Jews. So you have created a straw man to knock down. Stalin did persecute Jews on his own but this had nothing to do with Hitler. Also recent research suggests that more than 6 million may have been killed because many were not killed in camps at all. And what difference does it make if more Russians were killed than Jews -- putting aside the fact that there were Russian Jews? There was specifically a war of extermination against Jews.

    • 1 0
      Just because you are ignorant, doesn't mean the research hasn't been done
      • IW
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:34

      The Holocaust, and the murder of the Russians has been researched extensively, and the documentation exists and has been analyzed--much of it from the Germans' own meticulous records of who they killed and where. To portray this as a simple substraction game as you do is the height of ignorance. Just do't foist it over as fact.

    • 0 1
    • 1 1
      Holocaust facts
      • Tenpa
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:01

      May I suggest you check the german archives. Every name and date of birth as well location are listed of all those murdered. I found at least 7 of my family among the listings. The nazis were very strict in maintaining good records. Please add all names.

  • 100. 87 0
    He does make some valid points - lets be honest
    • American
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:44

    The Russian did suffer the most from the Nazis (upwards of 30 million people dead) and we do have a distorted view of Stalin and Hitler. I mean the fact that in Germany and some other states you cannot even openly debate this without going to jail says a lot about the powers that be and their fascistic trust in capital over people. I am not saying that the Nazis or Communist were not bad people, they were, but people should be allowed to debate this, hence, the distorted view of history. In terms of foreign policy, I believe that Israel is actually being controlled by the US industrialist of today - should Israel no longer prove useful to us, I have no doubt that we would flip like a coin on them.

    • 0 0
      Bad people
      • Wespe
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:06

      You forget to include the US in your list. It wasn't that long ago when little black children were murderer for 'getting out of line.' And that was well after the Nazi regimes demise. It's easy to see the faults in others. Thankfully, we are learning and progressing.

  • 99. 176 135
    The Zionists deceived the world.
    • Alvaro from Argentina
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:44

    I’m not a historian to give my verdict about the holocaust but I believe that the Zionists are preventing any kind of free debate about this subject which most likely will lead to delegitimizing the racist state of Israel which was established by Jewish immigrants at the expense of the native Palestinians. The Sympathy with the Jewish people made the world keep silent when they committed their crimes against the Palestinians. Otherwise how the world will support them if there is no such stories? Americans must have free media. God bless Palestine

    • 1 2
      as you say m you are not a historian
      • Michael K
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:32

      The Zionist movement is far before WW II and many jewish people immigrated to Israel before it, buying land from arab citizens to found communities and live there. Tel Aviv,Petah Tikva and many other communities were founded in the 19th century. Racist were the arabs who did not want to accept other then muslims in this territory. YOU HAVE TO LEARN MUCH instead of reading arab propaganda

    • 0 2
      Racist state?
      • Carlos Matamoros
      • 26.07.10
      • 22:59

      Have you ever been to Israel? There are more people of different races living here than just about any other country. You make the absurd statement that the Zionists deceived the world, yet you back it up with nothing. And, by the way, there is no country named Palestine.

    • 0 1
      well the first crime against the Jewish state were the Arabs attacking Israel in 1948
      • steve-nyc
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:07

      the UN , partition divided the land for 2 states one Jewish, one Arab and btw Jews had been in Israel for about 3000 years, the refugees from the holocaust came later before and after WW2 Call it fate, luck or Gods will but the 7 Arab armies lost in 1948 against a small but united Jewish guerrela army.

    • 0 0
      Max
      • NBlumenthal
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:26

      Blumenthal called it out. Haaretz hates him so they won't punish this comment. Maxblumenthal.com (read into the archives too). It's the final response..what is yours?????

    • 0 0
      debate?
      • al-kafir al-yahudi
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:37

      I find it amusing that the only historical event that people want to "debate" is the Holocaust, despite the OVERWHELMING evidence that it happened, and the number of dead is accurate. Why don't you debate slavery in the US? Then you'll see what a true lobby can do.

    • 0 0
      one true line
      • phil
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:32

      you are not a historian indeed

  • 98. 56 0
    Oliver Stone and Hitler...
    • Jeffrey
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:41

    Reminds me of the classic Sarah Silverman joke; her young niece tells her she learned in school that Hitler murdered 60 million Jews. Sarah replies, "60 million? No honey, it was only 6 million... 60 million would have been unforgivable!" Apparently, Stone does not understand irony. He can only provide it.

  • 97. 111 89
    Oh, this is fun!
    • Kevin
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:40

    Reading the droolings of the anti-gentiles on this site is high entertainment. And watching Oliver Stone rip the mask of "victimhood" off your ugly faces is even better. Mr. Stone: MAY I HAVE YOUR BABY?

    • 0 0
      To Kevin
      • Phil
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:15

      Hatred like yours just reinforces our resolve never to let this happen again. We know that the only dialog we would ever have with people like you is through the barrel of a gun.

  • 96. 0 72
    Watch his eyes
    • StevieT
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:29

    They dart, he squints, looking like a mad Captain Queeg. I think his mind is slipping into dementia.

  • 95. 87 0
    Prescott Bush and E.Roland Harriman funded the Nazis'
    • WEISS
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:17

    The point Stone makes is VALID. Where did the $ come from to build the NAZI WAR MACHINE? The people who FUNDED HITLER are just as guilty, and is as important to understand as Hitler himself. In 1942 Union Banking Corp. was among 4 companies confiscated by the US gov under the trading with the enemy act because it was a Nazi front bank. Among its owners were Prescott Bush & E. Roland Harriman. Prominent US, European, and British bankers, including some prominent Jews (Harriman) financially backed the Nazis: http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-2-the-hitler-project/ Here's is what Max Warburg had to say about it: Max Warburg replied on March 27, 1933, assuring his American sponsors that the Hitler government was good for Germany: “ For the last few years business was considerably better than we had anticipated, but a reaction is making itself felt for some months. We are actually suffering also under the very active propaganda against Germany, caused by some unpleasant circumstances. These occurrences were the natural consequence of the very excited election campaign, but were extraordinarily exaggerated in the foreign press. The Government is firmly resolved to maintain public peace and order in Germany, and I feel perfectly convinced in this respect that there is no cause for any alarm whatsoever. ” On March 29, 1933, two days after Max’s letter to Harriman, Max’s son, Erich Warburg, sent a cable to his cousin Frederick M. Warburg, a director of the Harriman railroad system. He asked Frederick to “ use all your influence ” to stop all anti-Nazi activity in America, including “ atrocity news and unfriendly propaganda in foreign press, mass meetings, etc. ” Frederick cabled back to Erich: “ No responsible groups here [are] urging [a] boycott [of] German goods[,] merely excited individuals. ” Two days after that, On March 31, 1933, the American-Jewish Committee, controlled by the Warburgs, and the B’nai B’rith, heavily influenced by the Sulzbergers (New York Times), issued a formal, official joint statement of the two organizations, counseling “ that no American boycott against Germany be encouraged, ” and advising “ that no further mass meetings be held or similar forms of agitation be employed. ”

    • 1 0
      funding Hitler
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:53

      we are talking 1933. At that thime all we knew was Htler's Mein Kampf and who would hae believed that a demented individual would be able to carry out the many crimes he and his helpers committed.

    • 1 1
      business
      • German
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:40

      Of course american companies made business with the nazi regime, simply because they were the rising power in a big market, backed also by german industry and big money. Not hard for them to choose between radical nationalism and communism, the choices of that time. I seriously doubt that Stone's movie, if there will be one, will reveal anything new, for the history of the nazi party and the ensuing world war / holocaust are probably the worlds best researched and documented events of modern history. I suggest Mr. Stone to visit some of the former death-camps in Poland and Germany.

  • 94. 50 66
    Oliver
    • Sol
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:14

    Must want to make a movie in Iran...what an incontrovertible idiot

  • 93. 50 98
    Shame on you, Stone.
    • 26.07.10
    • 20:00

  • 92. 51 80
    will there be a fatwa?
    • al-kafir al-yahudi
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:57

    everyone knows that stone is safe: no one is threatening to kill him, and he hasn't gone into hiding. if these statements were made analogously against muslims, he would have dozens of death threats by now and would have the need for armed guards. knowing this, why does everyone say the jews are bad and the muslims are good? he is purposefully picking on a group of people who WON'T resort to violence and saying how awful they are. and the ones who WOULD resort to violence are given a free pass. systemic failure.

  • 91. 75 76
    It's happened, we all knew it was coming...Oliver Stone
    • Mark
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:57

    has completely lost his mind!

  • 90. 76 99
    Notice how many readers (thumbs up) support the Holocaust deniers here
    • Steve
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:54

    This is Haaretz's audience.

  • 89. 0 49
    Truthful conversation
    • Texan
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:52

    Stone uncovers many facts regarding Americans who agreed with Hitler and profited as well. We all know that anti-semitism had been and continues to be alive and well within the US Government. the State Department, the Coucil of Foreign Relations, the FBI, CIA, Pentagon are all suspicious of Jewish Americans with dual loyalty. Roosevelt wasn't keen on bombing the railroad tracks leading to the concentration camps; or allowing a ship of fleeing European Jews to emigrate to America. The same boat that wasn't allowed to British occupied palestine. Truman felt he was forced to recognize a Jewish State; he didn't like Jews himself, as historians recorded. There was a American Nazi Party, later converted to the American Socialist party. Hilter wasn't the only anti-semite during this time, but was the only one to put the plan into action. Oliver Stone has a small minority of followers who think that Hugo Chavez and the Iranian illegitimate President are superior to our current government. These leftists finally expose themselves for the world to see. The Federal Reserve Bank who sets US monetary policy and is a private corporation partly owned by The Bank of England, The Bank of Germany, and a few of these anti-semitic families. Google it if you think I'm wrong.

  • 88. 121 60
    america is waking up!
    • Tarek
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:51

    wake up wake up wakep! stone you are the man!

  • 87. 60 58
  • 86. 85 104
    25/30 millions versus 5,933,900
    • Patricia
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:17

    Some commentaries are miserable and revolting. Oliver Stone made many in this interview that puzzled me. To compare war II casualties and said: Hitler did far more damage to the Russians than the Jewish people, it blew my brains out. At the end of the WWII, 67% (5,933,900) of the total 8,861,800 European Jews had gone up in smoke, literally for most of them. They were not Military Deaths or Civilian Deaths; they were exterminated like bugs without a “chance” to be involved in the war campaign to save their lives. Should we remind that Poland was left with -16.1% / 16.7% of its citizens (which most of them also were victims of an ethnic cleansing policy) or Lithuania -14.7% or the Gypsies which percentage of WWII losses is equivalent of the European Jews (Source Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties#endnote_USSR and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust .). Those percentages do not want to minimize the WWII death toll/casualties of the Soviet Union (at that time) which was 14% of its entire population. The damage of that Frankenstein Policy is still present in many European Towns, in the “leftover” of families who suffered from this Ethnic Cleansing Policy and World History. Oliver Stone plays with numbers and with this kind of game 350 000 Lithuanian Deaths and the 5,933,900 Jews do not mean anything compare to 25/30 millions Russians… Are we taking about “in context”??? Oliver Stone should apology to the Jews who dominate of the media that, maybe without them, he will not be the director he is today.

  • 85. 48 0
    The Mitzvot
    • Wespe
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:15

    calls for the extermination of the descendants of Amalek and the destruction of the Canaanite nations. So the Nazis wanted to eradicate the Jews. It wasn't the Jews that stopped Hitler, it was the combined forces of the Allied powers. Hitler's views weren't specific to Germany, they were based on prevailing European values of the time and they still exist today. Hitler's plans weren't designed just against the Jews. Many other groups would have gone the same path.

  • 84. 73 62
  • 83. 0 0
    The scapegoat and the point of view.
    • Misha
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:14

    I can agree that the he is an easy scapegoat for many accomplices for the 2WW atrocities, including Americans, Soviets, British, French. But the point of view it is something else, what was his point of mass killing of 5 thousands jewish inhabitans of the city of Slutsk? Did it help german war affort?! To understant this monster's fenomena ,one must look into pathology of the brain, postraumatic stess disorder, drug addiction, , and autistic syndrome. The combination of all of this factors made him who he was. People like him belong in a side show, not at the helm of major European power.

  • 82. 84 78
    To all the Holocaust-deniers on this blog
    • IW
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:12

    Welcome home--you'll meet plenty of your anti-Semitic brethren here. And by the way, it was the Nazis themselves who provided the most meticulous accounting of their victims. They left plenty of records, not least in Auschwitz where all those gassed were meticulously recorded in journals. But of course you're not interested in history; you're just interested in anti-Semitic ravings and propaganda. Carry on.

  • 81. 0 0
    • 0 0
      @ Dan
      • Chris Linthwaite
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:45

      Hitler was a world class bastard, nothing more to say about him thhan that. However Hitler could be easily scapegoated for the Holocaust. People can also point at him and say he was a one off. However, and you probably know the history of the Holocaust than me, he couldn't have achieved what he achieved in almost eradicating Jews in Europe without the help of Ukrainians Poles French etc etc etc. That is an important point to remember as is the fact that it was Russia who broke the back of Germany. To win in Russia Germany had to kill 10 Russinas to every 1 German. They managed to kill 9 Russians for every 1 German.

    • 0 0
      It all about money.
      • Misha
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:17

      It is all about money, it allways have been and allways will be. Hitler is just a " Bank rober" that got out of control of the real monsters that are hiding behind laws, leger books,polytical ideology, corporate governance at cetera.

    • 0 0
      o.stone
      • jason
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:26

      i'm not defending hitler,but he was not at the confrence at lake wannsee were the idea of the final solution was put into action,blame heydrich and the chicken farmer.

  • 80. 0 0
    Another waco
    • Dan
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:05

  • 79. 0 0
    Wealthy Liberals
    • k
    • 26.07.10
    • 19:05

    Just like Wealthy Liberals were warming up to the Nazis, it seems like Wealthy Liberals are warming up to the Arabs Anything to ensure their survival and ensure their wealth in case things get bad

    • 0 0
      Wealthy...
      • Phillip Cohen
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:39

      Do you think all wealthy conservatives love Israel and Jews? Do you think there were no Nazi conservatives? I am concerned with Stone's utterances. He made great as well as not so great films. I am not sure exactly what he is trying to prove or get at. However, his take on Hitler, so far, is deeply disturbing to me. This does not mean LIberals or Conservatives hate or love Jews. Anti-semitism operates across the ideological landscape. When it comes to our treatment trouble can come from the far right, the far left and from the tyranny of the middle. Anti-semitism is an equal opportunity hater.

  • 78. 0 0
    say "no" to drugs ... case in point
    • Alex
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:57

    Stone's films often have been criticized for promoting conspiracy theories and historical inaccuracies. JFK, for instance, centers on a heroic character who comes to believe that many high-level government officials had a hand in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. In 1991, he showed the film to Congress on Capitol Hill, which helped lead to passage of the Assassination Materials Disclosure Act[14] of 1992. The Assassination Records Review Board (created by Congress to end the secrecy surrounding Kennedy's assassination) discussed the film, including Stone's observation at the end of the film, about the dangers inherent in government secrecy.[15] Stone published an annotated version of the screenplay, in which he cites references for his claims, shortly after the film's release. Stone's screenplay Midnight Express was criticized for portraying the Turkish people in an overly negative light. The original author, Billy Hayes, around whom the film is set, has spoken out against the film, protesting that he had many Turkish friends while in jail.[16] Stone's film The Doors received criticism from Ray Manzarek (keyboardist–bass player) during a question and answer session at Indiana University East (in Richmond, Indiana), in 1997. During the discussion, Manzarek stated that he sat down with Stone about The Doors and Jim Morrison for over 12 hours. Patricia Kennealy Morrison - a well known rock critic and author - was a consultant on the movie, in which she also has a cameo appearance, but she writes in her memoir Strange Days: My Life With and Without Jim Morrison (Dutton, 1992) that Stone ignored everything she told him and proceeded with his own version of events. From the moment the movie was released, she blasted it as untruthful and inaccurate.[17] Surviving members of the band, John Densmore and Robby Krieger, also cooperated with the filming of Doors, but distanced themselves from the work before the film's release. Natural Born Killers is filmed and edited in a frenzied style where animation, grainy black-and-white 8 mm film, color 35 mm film, and VHS are intercut and juxtaposed in a psychedelic montage of images showing not only the story's action, but also conveying the thoughts and feelings of the characters. The film was criticized by some for its apparent glorification of violence. Quentin Tarantino was credited with "Story By" on the final film. In 1997, a book about the making of the film, Killer Instinct, was written by Jane Hamsher and published by Broadway Books. Also in 1997, Stone was one of 34 celebrities to sign an open letter to then-German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, published as a newspaper advertisement in the International Herald Tribune, which protested against the treatment of Scientologists in Germany and compared it to the Nazis' oppression of Jews in the 1930s.[18] Other signatories included Dustin Hoffman and Goldie Hawn.[18]

  • 77. 0 0
    That's happens ...
    • Alex
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:53

    Stone was born in New York City, the son of Jacqueline (née Goddet) and Louis Stone, a stockbroker.[2] He grew up affluently and lived in townhouses in Manhattan and Stamford, Connecticut. His father was Jewish and his mother a Roman Catholic of French birth, and Stone was raised an Episcopalian as a compromise[3] but has since converted to Buddhism. Stone attended Trinity School before his parents sent him away to attend The Hill School, an exclusive college-preparatory school in Pottstown, Pennsylvania. His mother was often absent and his father made a big impact on his life; father-son relationships were to feature heavily in Stone's films.

  • 76. 1 0
    Oh Oh - Oliver Stone and the Jews of America
    • ussishkin
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:45

    The "Holocaust industry" in the USA certainly exists and has consistently used Holocaust as a political lever with every US administration since WW2. It is responsible for devaluing the lessons of the Holocaust as a result and also for carrying out self-perpetuating activities in which 'the good of the survivors' is used to access funds which haven't always reached survivors. In Israel we haven't exactly covered ourselves in glory with the way we dealt with survivors and finances. BUT when a great film-maker embarks on the kind of project Stone is engaged with and describes it the way he has, then you cannot say the Holocaust industry deserves all the blame. That he trots out the now well publicised Meersheimer Walt contention that the Jews run US Mid-East foreign policy and adds the spicy suggestion that they run the US press too, is extremely worrying, if not because it's not substantiated. This is well beyond Stone's need to publicise an upcoming film by courting enough controversy to raise audience figures. Challenge the Holocaust industry - OK. Make ridiculous claims about a US wide Jewish press and power conspiracy - not OK. The question remains however, what is to be done about this? The answer isn't simple and Stone knows it.

  • 75. 0 70
    What a piece of dog crap
    • k
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:40

    Wow and to think I actually admired this guys work, I am going to send all my Stone DVD's back to the Store that buys Used DVD's, I don't care if they give me a nickel for all of them

    • 49 0
      so your saying u do not approve this film without even seeing it?
      • Duke
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:41

      maybe u can have it shut down before anyone else learns some truth about the jews. lol i personally can't wait to see it then i will have something to say about it. but then again i'm sure the jews will have it shut down here in canada and i'll have to go through black markets to get it.

    • 1 0
      and what is the truth?
      • k
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:03

      In case things ever get bad for the Jews again Lets hope people like Oliver Stone receive payback regardless, the Jews will never allow another holocaust to take place, they are loaded with WMDs in Israel, and they will take down the world with them if it ever got to that point

  • 74. 0 0
    It's all in the definition
    • G
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:31

    "Control the media" is a loaded term and begs to be defined. If Oliver Stone means that Jews somehow control what gets published I think he may be showing a clear bias of opinion as there are many publications (i.e. NY Times) that I would consider as left leaning and not too sympathetic to Israel. Trying to understand the details of how Hitler came to power and who supported him and for what purpose is perfectly fine in my opinion. Questioning the repetitition of the Holocaust and why it is important and unique for Jews suggests some level of bias and closed-mindedness in my opinion. The fact that many more people died during WW2 including the Russian, Slavs, Chinese is significant but its a differnt animal than the Holocaust. The Holocaust was a deliberate attempt to annihilate certain ethnic groups and it almost succeded. In fact, it succeeded in wiping out a large percentage of the Jews on earth in systematic and premedidated manner. This is very significant and in that light we would all benefit from understanding the mindsets, influences and interests at the time that allowed such a tragedy to take place.

  • 73. 0 0
    If the Jews are so smart as to control the Media why do they stink at it?
    • The Buzzer
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:28

    I have a problem with world control theories. If the Jews are smart enough to control the media, why aren't they doing a better job at it? Same goes with whoever is running the world (hard to keep track of this - what with Freemasons, Jews, Knights Templar, the Bilderburg Group, and the Kiwanis Club, etc.) But whoever it is (and you and Olver apparently know who you are), you suck at it.

    • 0 0
      Exactly
      • Thats just it
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:58

      Exactly. If there were a one world gov conspiracy, I'm sure they could control the info better. Its just antisemitism and racism covered with a blanket of paranoia.

  • 72. 0 0
    to Mr Gokhan numbers of jews killed
    • joseph theeboom
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:26

    sir you said you do not believe the number of jews killed is correct,let me explain to you, how that was done how did they arrive at the numbers?.very simple,lets say poland had 3 milion jews before WW2 when it was over there were only a milion left, that means 2 milion had imigrated to the north pole, are you with me so far? holland had 120000. when it was over about 10000 were left it seems also 110000 went to the south pole, the same in russia germany begium france and all the other countries taken over by the germans or like croatia who were with the germans. so MR Gorkan i dont know how good you are at figures but an averige student at school can work out how the numbers killed were arrived at. have a nice day joseph theeboom

    • 0 0
      Calculations
      • Cogito man
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:41

      So, there were X amount of Jews living in Polenad before the war. Now after the war there is only Y left. Definitely. Y is much smaller that X therefore the difference was exterminated right? BS for simpletons. Poland was "shifted" to the west and eastern part of that countey where most jews lived were taken over by Russia. Besides many Jews deserted to future Israel. Want proof? The elite of Jewsih immigration is Israel came from polan and there were many of them.

  • 71. 0 0
    oliver stone
    • sigmund
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:26

    Lifelong marijuana users become frequently prone to schizoid , self contradictory statements no matter how intelligent they are..Mr stone, a self confessed pot user is obviously no exception to it. It seems to be a medical problem.

  • 70. 45 0
    • 59 1
      Jewish treatment of arabs.
      • Misha
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:09

      If Hitles Germany was treating jewish people the way th state of Israel is traeting the arab population of the Jdea . Samaria & Gasa, Hitler would be a jewish national hero! Can you imagine? The jewish populatoin grew 3 to 4 folds during Nazi occupation! Some people are simply to stupid to understand the difference!

  • 69. 0 0
    US foreign policy
    • Jacques
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:23

    US and the western world's foreign policy has always been based on keeping Arab oil flowing to feed our industries. Jews have no control over this. If they did, the US would have boycotted OPEC years ago. Stone has to set up a phony straw-man in order to have anyting to say

  • 68. 0 0
    Stone
    • Moses
    • 26.07.10
    • 18:22

    What the F.. is wrong with the stones this year? From Richard Goldstone to Oliver Stone...

  • 67. 156 76
    • 0 0
      Wrong question/context
      • Nick
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:30

      It's not whether the Holocaust happened -- there is no denial that there was SOME great human tragedy there. It's whether, even if it did happen, that justifies the wholesale uprooting and subjugation of a people from the land they settled for two millennium. The answer is clearly that two wrongs don't make a right, if the rockets falling on your heads in Sderot didn't illustrate that far you already.

    • 0 0
      Good idea--let's subject it to a vote--that will bring them back to life
      • IW
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:39

      I'd sure like to see my dozens of relatives who were killed by the Nazis.

    • 0 43
      ?
      • Gershon
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:39

      how dare you post questions like this? For G-d sake, even if there were 5, or 4, or 3 or 2 or 1 million, we are still talking about a mass murder of innocent people, including babies, women ... I hope Mashiah comes soon and make you to repent for your incitement of hate towards the Jews.

  • 66. 55 1
    How dear he say us Jews control Hollywood?!
    • Alex
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:51

    We make sure he doesn't work ever again!

  • 65. 45 48
    another left wing nutjob...
    • judah ben hur
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:47

    same old same old...liberal left wing hollywood types, who think they matter because they're job is making movies...unfortunately, stones movies have for a long time sucked...this whole perversion of history and its real documented events are sadly being revisited by shmucks like this that want the average uneducated person to maybe re think otherwise documented history. And why? because some jerk from hollywood is a racist but makes movies and therefore its somewhow legitimate? its disgraceful.

    • 1 0
      Why do you hate liberals?
      • guest
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:57

      Are you aware that hitler was a conservative and absolutely despised and hated the liberals? In fact, they were one of the first groups of people the nazis rounded up and sent to camps for extermination simply because they were his political opponents--they were killed along with jews, catholics, gypsies, and many others. So please consider that when you denigrate and malign the liberals (the "left wing), that indicates you and hitler have something in common and that should concern you greatly. And what is the perversion of history that you're talking about? Stone has stated that his purpose for making this movie is to explore the issue of exactly who ALL the players were that financed the nazis. Who provided the financing? If it weren't for the financial support that the nazis obtained through some powerful banking/corporate giants of the day, the nazis and hitler could never have risen to power and the atrocities committed against the jews and others would never have occurred. So I don't understand what the problem is with trying to learn the truth about exactly who provided the financial support that allowed the nazis to rise to power in the first place. Why do you have a problem with that? For example, it's a matter of historical fact here in the US that Prescott Bush (GW's grandfather) was a nazi sympathizer and had a file entitled "the Hitler project." He and a few of his banking/corporate pals attempted to overthrow the US govt in 1933--yet he was never held accountable for any of it. Why? After the WWII, he and a few of his buddies were tried for aiding and abetting the enemy (the nazis), yet the media kept this information from the public and he went on to become senator. There is a saying that goes something like this: If we do not learn from of history, we are doomed to repeat it.

  • 64. 0 0
    Genocide can be a dogma but no need for Holocaust
    • Burak
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:44

    jews have strong and clear historical evidences unlike Armenians. that s why armenians try to use parliaments to make it a dogma to prevent free discussions. Jews do not need it.

    • 0 0
      you forget something....
      • leven5
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:21

      It was the ANZACs who fought the Ottomans and believe me they saw all they needed to see and will stand by the Armenian's evidence to prove genocide was indeed committed in vast numbers by the Turks.

    • 0 0
      Ironically, You prove that I am right
      • Burak
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:46

      what is the relation between ANZAC soldiers in Galipoli and armeniens living in the east? U are a proof that armenians target the people who do not know anything about history.

    • 0 0
      so what your saying is that the jews were there first? lol
      • Duke
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:50

      certainly u don't think that Moses married a sprit do you? lol what about those who helped the jews when they were banished from those lands? do they not have any historical rights? lol sorry my mistake we are not allowed to speak of those non jews.

    • 0 0
      Proof and belief are different!
      • Burak
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:38

      If u understand what u read, there wont be any problem. People who dont know anything about history may support Armenian genocide they have right to say what they think, but Parliaments may not ban the people debating about genocide. That s what armenians try to do. Belief is one thing, proof is an other thing.

  • 63. 0 65
    Nazi Stone
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:41

    I could not believe when I read this! Oliver should marry Mel and move to Pakistan or Afghanistan together ...Anti-Semitic- Idiots!

  • 62. 0 0
    Oliver Stone
    • Big D
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:31

    I have a word of advice for Oliver Stone: Stay out of the sun.

  • 61. 0 0
    Oliver Stone
    • Joan Peck
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:18

    It will be interesting to see how many omissions Stone will do to prove his point of view, as he did in his last documentary. And how many good will people will swallow it.

  • 60. 0 0
    Looney Tunes
    • Mike
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:16

    Besides boycotting Mad Max Movies I also plan to stop viewing Stone's films.

  • 59. 0 0
    hollywood went to his head
    • david
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:09

    like a lot of people who can't handle the fame and attention - stone has gone wacko! he thinks he's bigger /smarter than anyone else!!!

  • 58. 69 1
    Jewish control over the media
    • LEEM
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:08

    It would be better for him to say that Pro-Israel activists dominate the media. That would be more accurate. Because Pat Robertson and his CBN are cleary not jews, nor is Rupert Murdoch. However, in this Orwelian world that we live in, that too is anti-semitism!!! Those who dare criticize are immediately tried and executed for anti-semitism in the media; Helen Thomas and Octavia Nasir are the latest examples of that.

  • 57. 0 0
    O.Stone
    • John Arato
    • 26.07.10
    • 17:06

    What an a.hole!Do not patronize his movies.He doesn't deserve it.Can't believe he said these absurd and idiotic things.If he truly believes them-he is an idiot,first class!

  • 56. 0 0
    Not withstanding his anti-semite & anti-Jew beliefs, it is all but PR for his next movie
    • Man deVoshkes
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:53

    Get ready for the "nice Jews" to come out in hordes to support him

  • 55. 2 0
    listen americans
    • some one who knows
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:53

    have you ever asked yourselves americans what israelis think about you - it is the greatest secret since by such a perception they cotrol u -letting you enjoy the week ends yet they are engaged relenlessly in drawing the USA strategy fools

  • 54. 0 0
    out of order
    • geonwudinjo
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:50

    mr stone ,you may be good in film making but i rate your comment zero and out of point.

  • 53. 0 0
    Stone is crazy
    • asm
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:34

    He is an idiot - How can you say such a thing to the press - you don't have any common sense - Stone - what you were thinking - many greats much greater and bigger than you had kept mum all these years - why? They do not want to do sucide . You have the guts and courage but what use it is of if it finishes your professional life. Be smart - be wary - do not poke at bees nest or hive - they will be around you stinging like hell in a minute - you'll have no place to hide in the open except going underground - There is one way and that is to burn it down - but who is going to do it. Mr Stone think on those lines

  • 52. 45 0
    Im for it !
    • Gabriel
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:33

    As long as the information is factual i think it will be an eye opening movie to the vast majority of people who are uninformed and who simply absorb the information that they are thought. As long as the "Holocaust debate" is not used as a means to delegitimize israel and without basis to deny the tragedy, all historical facts should be known and studied. I think it would be very interesting to learn a more in depth historical account on the founding and funding of the Nazi party and so on...

    • 0 0
      Stone Stone
      • MFL
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:30

      A great deal has been studied and written by far greater minds than Stone for over 70 years and when have you ever seen an in depth historical account in a Hollywood movie? If you want to learn, read! Don't be naive.

    • 0 0
      Opinion or Propaganda?
      • phletz
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:37

      I dont think there is much to be discovered on the founding and funding of the Nazis. In my experience, most people who claim that 'an open discussion' on this topic would be necessary are in fact Antisemites and/or Nazis who, under the umbrella of freedom of opinion, want to spread doubt. What they claim is an opinion, is in fact nothing but propaganda. Shame on you, Oliver Stone, you are an even bigger idiot than I thought. Go on, and you'll beat Mel Gibson

  • 51. 134 168
    America has several Jewish organizations which oversee the media
    • Natallie Durson
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:33

    There are people who job it is to screen the American media for any hint of deviation from a pro-Israel slant. If they detect such a thing they call press conferences, command lawyers, and martial verious Jewish money to put the offender back in line. American media does not want this headache. This is why very little news is reported in America relating to the Arab/Israeli conflict. This is why the Arabs are always portrayed as the bad guys and the Jews are always the good guys when it is reported at all. The American media is allowed to report that Islamic extremism is rising, but they are not allowed to make any connection to Israel, even when it comes directly from the extremist groups. Years ago Osama Bin laden made a tape played in Arab nations and in the EU describing how American support of Israel was a major motivation for the 9/11 attacks. This was not allowed to be reported in America. I can go on and on, but I will just wait for Oliver Stones movie.

    • 98 91
      imbecile
      • Paul
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:40

      lol; Natalie you are probably the single most stupid racist and anti-semite I have read here today! For you, and shows a paranoid "Jewish international conspiracy" belief system. Has Columbia College in NYC offered you tenure yet?

    • 87 0
      Ugh
      • Jose
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:52

      Yes Natalie. In a US economy that has an unemployment rate of 10%+, there are actually loads of people getting paid to look at every facet of US media and then to shut them down. And yes, while the news in America always reports on atrocities in Sri Lanka, Sudan, Chad and elsewhere, there's no news on the Palestinian - Israel conflict. It's all hush hush. What meds are you taking?... that's some really powerful stuff....

    • 46 0
      stone
      • MFL
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:36

      How true! Ossama was "obliged" to blow up the World Trade Center to teach people like you who is really guilty. Wasn't that kind of him? Wait for the movie until a compassionate Ossama blows you out of your cocoon. Start learning history if they did not teach you in elementary school.

    • 64 86
      Hints for the clueless
      • Natallie Durson
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:40

      We are talking ADL and Abe Foxman here, although there are others.

    • 1 0
      by that same logic ...
      • Alex
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:46

      Jihadists hate democracy. lets scrap that idea whole together just to avoid a conlfict situation.

    • 43 0
      right on
      • Patrick
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:53

      The Jews continue to do what they have always done...practice ethnic nepotism. But then all races practice this except recent whites because they've been thoroughly demonized for it. But it's a natural thing, and always has been ....to favor your own race.

    • 1 1
      Jose
      • Maggie
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:30

      It is well known that Aipac intimidated and threatened the student body at Berkeley to stop them voting for divestment from Israel. They were threatened with being excluded from law school and for damage their overall future careers. How anyone can say that this is an isolated incident or that there are not powerful pro-Israeli lobbies in the US beggars belief.

    • 0 1
      Natallie Durson is 100% right.
      • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:35

      There World is no more blind.

    • 0 0
      Just factually incorrect
      • Clio
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:44

      I remmber hearing the Bin Laden tape reported on most major US media outlets. It actually came out several years after 9/11. Originally he blamed the US "occupation of Saudi Arabia", then in later tapes he started blaming that plus the Israel/Palestinain conflict. It had been reported hear. It is not news anymore. What would you have the media do, play it everday, just to make you happy

  • 50. 1 0
    What Oliver is Missing
    • Jenny F.
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:30

    He says that more Russians were killed than Jews. But what Oliver is missing is that an entire nation made it its objective to round up and murder people of a specific kind, including those that were counted among their own citizens, use them as slave labor, use everything from their hair to their teeth as industries, and treat them as less than human. War indeed is tragic and the loss of all life during WWII and others is quite sad. But the story behind the holocaust tells us of the depths enlightened human beings can go do, and asks probing questions about the world's treatment and perception fo the Jews.

    • 2 0
      28 million Russians were killed in the war.
      • Tony Silver - Kopenhagen
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:41

      According to Red Cross actual records found: 1 million Jews died from over crowding and meager food allocations due to bombing of Nazi food trucks. Now, 5 million Poles died with 28 million Russians and yet I do not see Polish or Russian Holocaust Museums on any street corner !! The difference is Jews control World MEDIA and have the MONEY !!

  • 49. 0 43
    The holocaust has been debated
    • Zari
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:15

    People have refuted the "official gospel" many times, and they were refuted by sound historical investigation from independent historians all over a period of decades. It was one of the most well-documented genocides in world history, mostly because the Nazis themselves kept such effective records. So I apologize if I refuse to be shaken to my core by some hysterical ninny of a filmmaker with a passing interest in the controversial. Sure, we would all do well not to let Hitler become our only model of "evil" but sometimes the devil really doesn't need an advocate, he does well enough on his own.

  • 48. 0 0
    Wow!
    • Harry
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:14

    I'm surprised this isn't all over the media a la Mel Gibson. And doesn't Oliver Stone realize that being "half Jewish" (father's side) that the Nazis would've sent him to the camps too?

  • 47. 65 0
    Oliver Stone: Jewish control of the media is preventing free Holocaust debate
    • Josie Michel-Brüning
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:12

    Oliver Stone seems to be quite right to me. Although, Hitler certainly had been a psychopathic personality he would not have had any success if he would not have been supported by the war industry in Germany as well as by concerns of other countries. The father of J.F.K. for instance invested in Hitler's policy too. Within Germany it was the humilialion by World War I and the following poverty because of the Treaty of Versaille. Well, we should learn from history the truism: there are no "just" wars, nor were there any in the past. We have only one earth to share. And we should not try dominating and exploiting other parts of the world. Human species cannot survive wtihout respect for each other and the resources given to us all.

  • 46. 85 0
    What's wrong with this guy
    • Michael Bloom
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:06

    He should be have his balls removed for speaking the truth like this. What's wrong with him. Everyone knows this but is it necessary to go around telling the rest of the sleeping idiots that are too busy working for us like slaves!!!! Don't worry, u will get your check also.

  • 45. 65 47
    When a career is washed up
    • Ron
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:02

    Pull the Jew card. Lets call Hitler, Stalin, Arafat, Chavez, Adjminidad a little misunderstood-Oliver Stone is losing it.

  • 44. 48 0
    Oliver Stone
    • mike
    • 26.07.10
    • 16:02

    any one denying what Mr. stone said word by word , is a lier and hypocrate. I hope to see every American is as smart as him, specially those crocked politicians who work for Israel and not for us. post my comment , I challenge you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

  • 43. 0 0
    After fifty men start loosing their minds, this conspiracy theory is what concerns a man?
    • JMK
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:59

    "American don't know about many things, like reading writing, thinking, most believe in the superstitions and myths of the day, Oliver Stone is a perfect example of the use of logical fallacies acrosss his work but that his has the secret is just too much.

  • 42. 0 0
    After fifty men start loosing their minds, this conspiracy theory is what concerns a man?
    • JMK
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:59

    "American don't know about many things, like reading writing, thinking, most believe in the superstitions and myths of the day, Oliver Stone is a perfect example of the use of logical fallacies acrosss his work but that his has the secret is just too much.

  • 41. 0 0
    Oliver Stone's father was Jewish and his mother Catholic
    • anonymous
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:58

    Who made this movie? Oliver Stone, who is half Jewish. Do Jews control the media? I don't know.

  • 40. 0 0
    Mel Gibson's good friend
    • tony
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:54

    The last I saw of Stone he was in a loving embrace with Chavez of Venezuela.

  • 39. 0 0
    And You Thought Mel Gibson had a runaway mouth!?
    • Wowza
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:53

    Mr. Stone is a very very confused man with some underlying psychological issues that are becoming pronounced with age. His upbringing as a child no doubt has had quite an impact: His father was Jewish and his mother a Roman Catholic of French birth, and Stone was raised an Episcopalian as a compromise[3] but has since converted to Buddhism. Stone attended Trinity School before his parents sent him away to attend The Hill School, an exclusive college-preparatory school in Pottstown, Pennsylvania. His mother was often absent and his father made a big impact on his life; father-son relationships were to feature heavily in Stone's films.[4] His parents divorced when he was 15, due to his father's extramarital affairs with the wives of several family friends

  • 38. 81 0
    Holocaust
    • Jonathan
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:49

    You can deny and discuss GOD, you wont go to jail, but if you discuss or deny Holocaust you go to jail, that Jewish complete controll

    • 0 0
      Horrible Point
      • OutOfHere
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:04

      God is not proven, therefore debatable. The holocaust is documented, therefore not debatable.

    • 0 0
      GOD and STONE
      • MFL
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:46

      In a free country you can deny God if you can't prove it. But if you deny somethig like the holocaust that has been proven over and over again and you deny it, then go to jail and stay there. Yes.

    • 0 0
      History set in Stone
      • Peter
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:51

      You must be kidding. Every historical event is always being studied and written about as more "truth/fact" becomes known. The holocaust has become a type of "religion" that is now dogma and cannot be challenged or questioned. Talk to a Jew about BabiYar and you are told 35,000 Jews were killed, talk to a true historian and you will find that 100,000 to 120,000 died there. Apparently 65,000 -85,000 lives do not count because they were not Jewish but are in fact part of the history ignored in the Jewish centered version of it.

    • 0 0
      Watch the anti-Semites...
      • SDHD
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:15

      Spew their anti-Semitism on a website from the one and only Jewish country. They blather that Jews are obsessed with themselves, meanwhile, they're the ones obsessed with Jews.

  • 37. 59 48
    Name two.
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:48

    Name two media centers controlled by Jews. Hollywood, news stations, anything. Didn't think you could. Bigoted freaks.

    • 50 0
      name two
      • will
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:52

      1. MGM (Metro Goldwyn Meyer)The name speaks for itself) 2.Warner Brothers (owned by four jewish brothers) 3. Colombia (jewsih CEO) 4. Universal (jewish founder) 5. NBC (owner/president jewish Jeff Zucker) 6. Fox, Fox news, 20thcentury Fox etc. (Rupert Murdoch jewish mother and that makes him jewish) 7.MTV, Nikelodeon, Viacom, Paramount, TV land, Comedy Central (Owned by: Summer Murray Redstone AKA Rothstein!) Dreamworks (owners: Geffen,Katzenberg, Spielberg) 8.Walt Disney, ABC (owners: Robert Iger, Michael Eisner both jewish) 9.News channels: CBS, CNN, FOX, ABC, ESPN, NBC, NY times, Washington post, US news, Reuters all jewish owned or ran i.e; CEO/Presidents! This probably wont get posted, I'm sure!

    • 0 0
      Do you really think Departures was the best Forien
      • ben
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:17

      film of 2009. By far the best forien film of 09 was Waltz with Bashir. Why do you think it didn't win . Could it be that hollywood has a problem with movies about Jews who are not portrayed as victims.

    • 0 0
      name two
      • Mickey
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:57

      Both MGM and Warner Brothers have not been owned by Jews for many years, Rupert Murdoch's father was Rev Patrick John Murdoch, so he wasn't Jewish; and his mother was Elisabeth Joy Greene whose parents were an Irish Protestant father and an upper-class English mother (Marie Grace de Lancey Forth). I don't think it's likely that her Irish Protestant father married a Jewish woman anyway, let alone her last name was de Lancey Forth, so she isn't Jewish either. We all know how pro-Jewish/Israel the NY Times, CBS, CNN, the ABC, Reuters etc are, ha ha!

  • 36. 0 0
    still smokin
    • hagop
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:44

    oliver stone is stoned and must be stoned...

  • 35. 45 47
    Stone has now gone totally off the deep end
    • IW
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:41

    Finding yet another conspiracy in the Jews, and further finding refuge in no less than Hitler and Stalin, and blaming IBM and GM, indirectly, for the Holocaust? Is there any quicker way to announce to the world, "hey, I'm a nut-case"??

  • 34. 101 49
    Mr Stone, you have the guts to say it as it is, HATS OFF.
    • Peter of Florida
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:35

    The reason that he is able to say it in plain english is the fact that he is not running for office and the AIPAC guys has no leverage. Stone is a Vietnam veteran and a great patriot. I trust him whole heartedly and agree with everything he is saying. It is high time that we take back our country, our State Department and out Pentagon.

    • 0 0
      Financing
      • Olavi
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:13

      It is truth that some big corporation world wide financed nazis, and hoped their win over communits. It is good that Stone to increases the knowldge of sense of history among americans, who are unbelieable ignorant (stupid) about reason and cause.

    • 0 0
      stone
      • MFL
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:51

      Was it just a slip of the tongue that you want OUT with the Pentagon? Would you like Ossama IN the Pentagon?

    • 0 0
      #34 Peter of Florida
      • D.Litner
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:01

      I was pleased to read your post. It explained your motivation in your many post about Israel

  • 33. 0 0
    Stone makes no sense. Far from blaming Hitler...
    • McQueen
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:34

    Jews are more likely to blame German and European Jew-hatred as a whole.

  • 32. 44 0
    WW1 and WW2
    • leven5
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:28

    History always finds a way of catching up with us; why? Because we never learn from our mistakes of the past. In order TO learn we must investigate and try to understand how and what turn of events really led to the Holocaust of so many millions of people.

  • 31. 0 48
    Stone is a WWII Buff! Who would have known?!
    • MIke
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:21

    I, myself, is a WWII enthusiast and whatever he believes in is simply NOT TRUE. Trivializing the Holocaust, blaming WWII on others, not having much understanding of what is a dictator..... In Stalin's USSR Mr. Stone would have been digging for coal in the out-reaches of Siberia and under Hitler Mr. Stone would by now already be rotting with a bullet in his head somewhere in Buchenwald.

  • 30. 1 63
    Least controversial statement in history
    • PeteMoylan
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:09

    What would be controversial if he said that jews don't control the media. It's a well established fact that jews control the US media. Hollywood and newsmedia is owned by jews. The only thing he'll get in trouble for is not saying that it is a good thing.

    • 55 52
      Jewish media "control"--only in the minds of anti-Semites
      • IW
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:01

      It's interesting, you all who praise Stone for his anti-establishment opinions, yet you parrot the obvious lie that "it is well established that Jews control the US media." Is it "well-established"? By who, by anti-Semites like you? The fact is that the vast maajority of the media is NOT owned or controlled by Jews. But you don't really care about facts, do you, wehn it contradicts your anti-Semitic fantasies?

    • 50 0
      Control of the US media
      • Observer
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:53

      IW, come on, be honest. Look at who owns the major, mainstream media in the US ... NYT, WP, etc. They are facts. You don't need to be an anti-Semite to acknowledge facts. You do need to be be either ignorant or dishonest not to. However, as I mentioned in my earlier post, due to the variety of opinions present among Jews, that fact in itself doesn't necessarily stifle debate. I'd be more critical of the power of the lobbies like AIPAC than the media. Any nation ruled by lobby cannot possibly consider itself fully democratic, but closer to an oligarchy, since only the richest can afford to buy politicians. In this case, due to the success of US Jews, it's a fair comment to say US foreign policy is at least strongly influenced, if not controlled, by the Jewish community. But I'm not saying that's wrong: Any community would do that, if it were to their advantage, and if they were able to. Its just that (so far), Jews have been the most successful at playing that game.

    • 1 0
      To "Observer"--you prove my point
      • IW
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:47

      The Washington Post is owned by Jews? News to me! Another problem is visibility--AIPAC is visible to all, but the government is really controlled by the unseen lobbyists for corporations, etc., who you don't read about in the "media" and to whom the politicians are truly indebted. Literally.

    • 0 0
      Re: To "Observer"--you prove my point
      • Observer
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:30

      I admit I have rushed to judgement, at least insofar as the WP is concerned. It has had at least partial Jewish ownership ever since Eugene Meyer bought it in 1933, but this has obviously lost meaning somewhat as a public company. The paper has, however, been a staunch and consistent supporter of Israel (no bad thing) regardless of policy or government (not quite as impressive). As for the US government, I agree that lobby pressures, many out of the limelight, do shape its politics and that, in my modest opinion, can be inconsistent with the principles of universal good governance. What is good for the (wealthy) few need not necessarily be good for all - and often it's not. Government has the duty to all its people, not a sub-section of it, especially when a lobby for moneyed interests forwards its own agenda over the common good. But that's just me.

    • 0 0
      Jews own most of the media? Ridiculous
      • IW
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:05

      The biggest media conglomerates: Murdoch, Time Warner, GE, Ted Turner--none of them Jewish, or owned by Jews. Sorry, fellows, it just may be that most of your compatriots actually agree with Israel's stand against Islamo-fascism that causes them to support Israel. Because they know that Israel, like the Jews in the past, stand in the way of fascism and racism the world over. Today it's the Jews, tomorrow it;'s the rest of us.

    • 1 0
      Ted Turner is Jewish? Hearst? Forbes? Murdoch? Oprah?
      • SDHD
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:13

      Anti-Semites are morons.

    • 0 0
      NYT might have a Jewisg CEO but it is not pro Israel
      • David Israel
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:13

      If you follow NYT daily as I do you will see that it is rather an anti Israeli paper. Only last week Nichaolas Christof had an anti Israel article about the well built Israeli settlements next to Arabs living in make shift tents. So many media might be owned or run by Jews but it does not mean any bias. I already gave one example and there are many more.

    • 0 0
      MURDOCH
      • donald
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:31

      He's a hard-line Zionist Jew.

    • 0 0
      MURDOCH
      • Donald
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:33

      See above. Assertions aren't automatically true.

    • 0 0
      Facts
      • PeteMoylan
      • 26.07.10
      • 23:57

      News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).

  • 29. 0 0
    jewish control of the media
    • erik keller
    • 26.07.10
    • 15:04

    well know facts, but thank you for the artical

  • 28. 0 0
    Lets await a WikiLeaks report on Stone.
    • Stephen(Geneve)Switzerland
    • 26.07.10
    • 14:44

    Surprise, surprise. Thats the real news today. Regarding Mr.Oliver Stone, well we all know he is a controversal figure, he adores the PR, also he has made some excellent movies. Lets just get on with the real news, Somalia and Shebab, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Global warming. The BP catastrophe. Mr.Obama and his poll readings. A good day to all.

  • 27. 0 0
    Americans dealt with Hitler
    • Harold
    • 26.07.10
    • 14:34

    Oliver Stone missed one name who dealt with Hitler and that is Prescott Bush, grand father of George W. Bush.

  • 26. 0 69
  • 25. 0 76
    No Debate - Just Foolishness
    • Jane
    • 26.07.10
    • 14:16

    Stone has the right to think and say what he wants but there is no " Holocaust debate" except in the minds of those trying their best to delegitimize Israel and the Jewish people. Stone is a shameless self-promoter and politically crazy. He enjoys nothing more than pouring salt on people's wounds to get a reaction, somewhat sadistic if you ask me. The Holocaust by Oliver Stone will be another round of scab picking....ala Stone.

    • 60 0
      for God sake
      • sara
      • 26.07.10
      • 14:56

      stop whinning will u....it's 2010 "pouring salt on people's wounds" dnt u think u have abused the memory of ur ancestors enough already...let them rest in peace and try to find another reason to ligitimize ur existence..

    • 0 0
      Well said Sarah
      • Nick
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:36

      And FYI to Israelis who drink too much of the hasbara koolaid: this is truly what the world thinks of you.

    • 0 0
      Well said Sarah
      • Nick
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:36

      And FYI to Israelis who drink too much of the hasbara koolaid: this is truly what the world thinks of you.

    • 0 0
      ancestors??
      • Gershon
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:02

      how dare you??! Thanks g-d many of the people who went through the concentration camps are still alive today ... We are not talking ancient history here. And Jews did not bring this subject up, it's this crazzy lunatic who did. His father is Jewish ... but it looks like he has rotten soul ...

  • 24. 57 0
    Why?
    • Max
    • 26.07.10
    • 14:12

    Why criticise Oliver Stone for doing a film about two historical figures? Does anyone flinch about Attila or Gengis Khan? They also were a bit of savage mass murderers, pillaging, raping and massacring whole populations. But i wouldn't be accused of being anti-mongolian if i did a film about him. To depict the economical trappings and political deals that permited a man like Hitler to seize power is not a negative thing, all the oposite. It's more likely to be educational, as not to repeat the same mistakes again. Do not forget that was the harsh impositions of the WW 1 victors on germany, the economic depression of the late 30's, an unstable political establishment, and finally a putsch paid by the industrialists that put Hitler into power. Anti-semitism had existed for centuries in Europe, Hitler just added gasoline to the fire, choosing the jews, and his political rivals, the communists as the root of all evil. Basically, scapegoats, accused of all the problems the germans had. By directing the hate and frustration of a whole nation towards the jews, he could, literally, get away with murder.

  • 23. 45 0
    whats the big deal?
    • e
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:54

    all he is going to do is present the story in a way that is different than in the usual films that focus on the jewish murder. maybe it s true that companies such as GM and IBM helped the nazi regime and this would be quite interesting to see... to all those criticising him already: there is nothing disrespectful in the comments written in the article. and yes, jews have a strong control over the media and many more things in america. (probably this is why it s the most successful country in the world)

  • 22. 41 73
    stone the dictator lover and anti semite
    • arthur
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:43

    why does Haaretz not say what he really is? An anti semite, those who utter remarks like the Jews control this or that, that is simply antisemtism!! The Jews do not control the US media nor US politics. Those who claim otherwise are anti semites and should be treated that way.

  • 21. 0 0
    Buz SEA
    • Differently this time...
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:30

    Usually American will do something that satisfy Israeli, but now seems go to opposite way..

  • 20. 115 1
    I am speaking as someone who truly dislikes Oliver Stone.
    • reno
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:25

    I would like someone to tell me what Mr. Stone said that was untrue. American industrialists did provide support to Hitler before and during the war, enabling him to commit the Holocaust. AIPAC is one of the strongest lobbies in the US and is extremely vigilant about publicizing anything critical of Israel. More Russians were killed in the war than any group other than the Slavs and the Chinese. He has not denied the Holocaust. He has not said anything anti-semitic. Please tell me the factual errors and why people are so upset.

  • 19. 48 0
    media
    • aghabi
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:23

    free media is a must to guantee freedom of speach

  • 18. 0 0
    The Holocaust. Israeli nationalism and ethnocentrism
    • anonymous
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:17

    The Holocaust is a fact. Remembering the Holocaust unites the Jewish people as a nation, in Israel and abroad. Therefore, great emphasis is given to the Jewish Holocaust by Jewish people, which also leads to some ethnocentrism and nationalism. Some people might be offended by this because ethnocentrism causes us to be concerned about ourselves, but often not empathetic to others. Aside from the bane of nationalism and ethnocentrism, the Holocaust is a fact which cannot be questioned. Which media is he reading, because I read media from all over the world, which is not Jewish controlled and in the USA, which is not Jewish controlled, and the Holocaust is studied and discussed by all. For instance, there is Holocaust discussion on an Armenian website; no one is preventing a free discussion which is very educational, because the editor is a major in genocide studies, which is a growing field of study, which more universities, high schools will include in their curriculum, as more people become educated as teachers.

  • 17. 90 1
    Why are some so upset?
    • A.A
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:16

    When Stone says that Holocoust wasn't unique and Hitler killed much more Slaws and Roma and Sinti, but unfortunately they have no lobby in the US.

  • 16. 0 0
    Hitler was a great German leader but became even greater racist
    • Bloodyscot
    • 26.07.10
    • 13:01

    Hitler rebuild Germany after WW1 which was no small task but due to his racism and a lot of drugs instead of sending the Jews back to the ME which was his original plan, he created the Holocaust, killed 20M Russians and helped cause massive destruction of Europe. Stalin was not a racist but a Sadist, he hated anyone who would try to remove him from power or get in his way to more power.

  • 15. 81 0
    According...
    • SJ
    • 26.07.10
    • 12:35

    To the article, all he say is that Hitler and the Naziparty did not come out of nothing, but was created by circumstances and finansial support. Why is that controversial? Maybe the controversial part is the notion that jews do not have the worldpatent on suffering, during WWII?

  • 14. 0 0
  • 13. 89 0
    Holocaust films
    • Hirz
    • 26.07.10
    • 12:27

    it seems that each year, there is a movie about the Holocaust, it feels like the Jews look at it as a celebration, because without it, there wouldn't be an Israel today.

    • 0 0
      Disagree
      • Lisa
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:50

      Because movies always glamorize things even if they're terrible and unthinkable. The media skews everything and makes it fit for a movie with fake stories and skewed facts about what actually happened. And Israel isn't exactly wanted by every Jew...also, it is constantly fighting with Palestine and the rest of the Arab world. Who would have wanted that??

    • 0 0
      Zionism predates the Holocaust
      • Daniel
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:48

      The Zionist movement began in the late 19th century and the Holocaust occurred over 50 years later. Your assertion ignores this fundamental fact.

    • 0 0
      Hirz
      • zionist forever
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:53

      George Lucas keeps churning out Indiana Jones and Star wars films the reason for this is not politics its the fact that people will be willing to go pay see it. Other movie makers wouldn't be making all these Holocaust movies if they didnt think there was a market. So if people and not willing to go pay and see another Holocaust film they just won't make them because at the end of the day in 99% of occasions the motive is how much money will I make from this film not I am doing this based on principles.

  • 12. 0 54
    Stone and chavez
    • Albert
    • 26.07.10
    • 12:26

    This guy is being paid by president Hugo Chavez to appear as an international symbol in south america. All his comments are dedicated to the "Bolivarian Revolution" which up until today has killed, jailed and stole. I have no respect at all for this thief.

  • 11. 42 0
    without fair
    • dror
    • 26.07.10
    • 12:12

    Interesting. It is indeed difficult to historically criticize Hitler & co or Stalin & gang as it should be. And Aipac activities lead to a one way understanding of israel-arab problem... Is this the time to reconsider the way to lobby and how to study History? Without fair.

  • 10. 76 0
    The banality of evil
    • Sara Plaza
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:59

    I agree that the figure of Hitler has become a caricature and it is important to explore how events come about. Governments are financed, wars are financed often with little regard for those who are suffering as long as there are financial returns. It is important to explore how Dictatorships are created and supported. They just don't arrive out of the blue... and often the hidden players are to be found in our own backyards. Just look at how the western countries supported Saddam Hussein's brutal actions until he turned against them. Or look at the funding of the Taliban (who always practiced a backward form of Islam, treating their women horrendously) against the Soviets. They were fully backed by the US until they refused to cooperate in building pipelines... Unfortunately, when there are profits to be made, morality is rarely considered. Let us not forget as well the US refusal to allow the hundreds of passengers of the St. Louis, fleeing from Nazi persecution to enter the country in 1938. (Requiring passengers to apply for visas through normal channels and "wait" their turn). If this film is able to communicate how dictatorships come about (also through the apathy of their citizens), how stereotypes are created and used for promoting hatred and ultimately financial profit, it may be a good thing.

  • 9. 43 64
    Oliver ! Oliver !! Are you out of your mind to speak like that ??
    • Mohamed ( green mtn )
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:48

    You must be Anti-Smite and Jew hater !! Mr Stone your career is over !!

  • 8. 0 79
    Stone is the mirror image of Gibson
    • Nemesis
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:47

    As usual, when it comes to blaming Jews, the extreme right and the extreme left are happy to embrace each other

    • 0 0
      Wrong
      • Texan
      • 26.07.10
      • 19:32

      The extreme left, which is represented by Code Pink, ACORN, SIEU, The New Black Panther Party, George Soros, Socialists, Marxists, Communists, many Democrats, Liberals "Progressives", and many Jews themselves, are anti-Jew/anti-Israel. The extreme right are only represented by skin heads and neo-nazi's as anti-Jew/anti-Israel. The majority of Conservatives, Republicans, Evangelical Christians, religious Jews are pro-Israel. This is the majority of the US. Don't let the facts get in your way.

  • 7. 96 42
    finally
    • sara
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:30

    good to c someone out there could not be bought by the zion propaganda machine

  • 6. 113 0
    sounds right to me
    • josh
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:18

    he just left out stupid american evangelicals

  • 5. 91 1
    I liked Platoon, but few of his other movies.
    • Johnboy
    • 26.07.10
    • 11:08

    Still, nobody can deny that the dude has courage....

  • 4. 155 55
    Courage
    • Gokhan
    • 26.07.10
    • 10:45

    He must have really some courage to say that considering how influential Jewish lobby is in US. I remember many people lost their jobs just because they expressed their free thoughts about Israel - PA conflict.

    • 0 68
      Courage, nyet
      • Jeff
      • 26.07.10
      • 13:32

      Name one then!

    • 0 59
      really?
      • e
      • 26.07.10
      • 13:44

      "just because they expressed their free thoughts about Israel - PA conflict" ?? please name one person

    • 84 0
      I will name two!
      • Gokhan
      • 26.07.10
      • 13:49

      White House Correspondent Helen Thomas and CNN Middle East editor Octavia Nasir.

    • 0 70
      Gokhan
      • zionist forever
      • 26.07.10
      • 14:03

      Who exactly lost their jobs because they expressed free thought about Israel PA conflict ... America is not Nazi Germany where you can lose everything because you disagree with the state or the position it takes on things. As for that idiot stone he not taking on the jewish lobby or anybody else because he is not a politician. He is just an ordinary individual who is an anti semite .... the truth doesn't come out about the holocaust because the jews control the media, the Russians suffered more than the jews, Hitler had reasons for all these things he did. The idea Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Frankenstein to sounds to me like he is calling Hitler the victim. in the Frankenstein story the monster is a victim as well as the killer .... is he now saying Hitler was a victim. Stone is an anti semitic Nazi apologizing nobody who made a couple of good movies like Platoon and is now a washout.

    • 76 0
      How about Norman Finkelstein?
      • Mary Hughes-Thompson
      • 26.07.10
      • 14:44

      just for starters.

    • 52 0
      The answer is:
      • ain't Gokhan, but...
      • 26.07.10
      • 14:46

      Octavia Nasr, Michael Sheuer, James Traficant, etc.

    • 89 0
      I will name two!
      • Gokhan
      • 26.07.10
      • 14:53

      This is the second time I am trying to post a reply. Helen Thomas, oldest active member of the White House Press Corps and Octavia Nasr, senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs. Actually US is worse than Nazi Germany if you are not a Pro-Israeli. The main-stream media is directed by Jewish lobby and most of the ordinary US citizens never get a chance to hear the other side of the story.

    • 0 0
      Gokhan - I have a few questions to you
      • David Israel
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:02

      1. Do you believe that a Jewish Holocaust ever happened? 2. Do you believe that some righteous Turks like Selahattin Ulkumen saved the lives of Jews who would otherwise be sent to Hitler's gas chambers? If your answers are 'yes I believe' then you disagree with Oliver stone. But if y9our answers are 'no' then don't ever claim that Turks saved Jews since you don;t believe that the holocaust never existed.

    • 0 52
      Helen Thomas remarks
      • david
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:18

      Helen Thomas said that all the jews shoud leave israel . when asked to where she said back to poland or germany(back to the concentration camps basicly) USA is a friend of Israel how would you feel if a official representative of our goverment (she wah a member of the white house press corps) would say that all americans shoud get to hell of amerika and get back to vitenam or england? (thats still a bad exmaple because americans dont have the same strong connections to the usa and as Israei's have to the and of Israe)

    • 0 0
      Helen Thomas is the latyest I remember..
      • Ice
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:31

      You asked for one name.. I have more thought. Will provide them one at a time if you want.

    • 49 0
      Courage
      • Observer
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:34

      You're all correct as well as wrong. There is a pretty strong Jewish lobby and it does influence foreign policy, especially towards the ME, and of course most of the mainstream media is Jewish owned, but I wouldn't go as far as to say there is no debate. Firstly, even within the "Jewish" community there is huge diversity of opinions, and secondly, criticism, even if mild, has surfaced even there. Then there is the power of the internet. As far as Stone is concerned I do not believe he's anti-Semitic, but he certainly loves whipping up controversy, the bigger the better. And you can't get much bigger than this ...

    • 51 0
      Hello DavidIsrael, my old friend..
      • Gokhan
      • 26.07.10
      • 16:50

      1. Yes, I believe Jewish Holocaust happened. 2. Yes, I know that some righteous Turks like Selahattin Ulkumen, Behiç Erkin, Necdet Kent, etc.. saved the lives of Jews. However, Oliver Stone did not say Holocaust never happened. He just emphasized that Jewish control of the US media is preventing an open discussion of the Holocaust. I also believe that the numbers of the Jewish people who were killed in Holocaust are exaggerated. And Oliver Stone is complaining about how Jewish lobby gets frustrated when someone in US says what I say just now. Isn't it possible to discuss numbers? Isn't it possible to discuss how zionists use this holocaust to make an excuse to kill Palestinians and Turks? It is not according to Jewish lobby in US.

    • 0 0
      What "controversy" is there to say "Jewish people cause me troubles"? I'd say this is pretty much mainstream. Mel Gibson & police?
      • Miron
      • 26.07.10
      • 17:10

      You don't have to admit, but if this is not Anti - Semitic than what is? The ostritch policy of Christian community about rampant Anti - Semitism is too 20th century...

    • 0 0
      Gokhan's martyrs in the name of free speech
      • Jeff
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:06

      Check your facts - 1) Helen Thomas gave an anti-semitic tirade, not a commentary on the Israeli-Palestinian problem; 2) Octavia Nasr also was commenting on a Hezbollah cleric, not on the Israel-Palestinian problem - although I think she was unfairly treated, but not because of the way you portray them!

    • 0 0
      Gohan so it is a matter of numbers to you.
      • David Israel
      • 26.07.10
      • 18:31

      As you depict it if the numbers are not exaggerated and it is less then 6 million Jews killed then it was not such a bad thing is that what you are saying? WW II is not a very old event. I still have one survivor of Auschwitz relative (deported from Rhodes) living in Belgium. I have another relative who fought in the USA army as a code breaker who had first hand experience in it. All is written and well documented. Don't forget that Turkey invaded Cyprus over much less then 6 million Turks killed in the Island. Shyall we also start discussing openly this incident? The mass graves of Greek civilians found in north Cyprus last year?

    • 0 0
      Distortation
      • Gokhan
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:42

      David, stop distorting what I am saying. I did not say it was not such a bad thing, neither did Oliver. It was one of the worst thing that ever happened. I respect the deads in Holocaust. But zionists do not have the right use this as an excuse to kill Palestinians or Turks. I do not respect that! By the way, the Cyprus Peace Operation, military code named Atilla, can be discussed freely in every platform unlike Holocaust.

    • 0 0
      Re: Jeff
      • Gokhan
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:48

      Telling Israelis to go back to Europe is anti-semitic? Really? I think that you should be the one who is supposed to check his facts. So you admit that firing Octavia Nasr was too much just because he commented on the most moderate leader of Hezbollah cleric. And how can you claim that it is not a Israel - Palestinian problem. Please be reasonable.

    • 41 0
      that is the point Jeff
      • SJ
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:51

      anything critical of Israel offical word or holocaust is taken as anti semitc... this word has been thrown at people so much that its useless now... semitic people also includes Arabs have u seen Fox News.. if I had a cent for everytime Fox News calls an Arab a terrorist i would be buying Fox News... isn't it true that most of the people living as jewsih israelis were born not in israel but claiming their supposed rights from 2000 years ago... ur foreign minister livesin an illegal settlement from Russia... most living jews in isreali are from USA, Britian, Russia, Germany, Poland... that is not anti semitism but a fact ... like i breath oxygen for live

    • 46 0
      Helen Thomas is Lebanese, and was 30 when Israel was Created, and about 50 when the Palestinians got expelled to Lebanon
      • Bernie
      • 26.07.10
      • 20:54

      So of course her opinion is that the Jews coming to Palestine, displacing the Palestinians, which then resulted in friction and civil war in Lebanon until 1992, was a bad thing. There is nothing wrong with here having that opinion, and remembering, that the Jews that settled Palestine, decided to make the Lebanese, her nation, take care of the Palestinians.

    • 0 0
      to Gokhan
      • Alex
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:29

      Gokhan, if you feel there's an exaggeration in terms of the numbers, why not to take a trip to ANY town in Poland or Ukraine - there's definitely a place where Nazis killed Jewish people in every town. Kiev, Odessa, Donetsk, Warshaw, Lviv - any eastern european town occupied by Nazis had its Jewish citizens who did not run away from Nazis killed.

    • 0 0
      No one is using it as an excuse to kill
      • David Israel
      • 26.07.10
      • 21:58

      Israel did no go out hunting Turks using Holocaust as an excuse. They did not want to kill anyone. they were exercising their sovereignty over the Gaza shore that was given to Israel under a 1992 agreement by the PA. IHH (and its supporter AKP Government) did not listen to the early warnings before the flotilla started to sail, continued to ignore all the following warnings then attempted to stop the ships peacefully. All other ships surrendered peacefully except the one under IHH control. Even the caotain of the Mavi marmara admitted that a group of about 30 to 50 boarded the ship separately smuggling disk cutters and using them to cut the steel from the boat 2 hours prior to the IDF landing. About the mass graves found in North Cyprus: When will there be an official inquiry? It is almost a year that they were found. So far I haven't heard any discussions. And I rad Turkish media in and out.

    • 0 0
      and another...
      • samos
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:06

      the former leader of 'MOVEON'

    • 0 0
      Helen Thomas & Octavia Nasir
      • D.Litner
      • 27.07.10
      • 00:26

      They lost their job because being journalists their employer could not allow partisans to report the news in a neutral way. If they expressed pro-Israel,they would also be fired by CNN etc

  • 3. 124 55
    I so agree with him
    • Miggy
    • 26.07.10
    • 10:40

  • 2. 54 88
  • 1. 112 111
    Oliver Stone
    • M. Ohana
    • 26.07.10
    • 10:10

    I guess that a movie on the Shoah is out of question for Stone; quite a befitting name at that. He's just looking for a new controversy. I would say more, but I would be wasting my time even more.