Subscribe to Print Edition | Sun., June 29, 2008 Sivan 26, 5768 | | Israel Time: 01:16 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
  Back to Homepage
Rosner's Domain
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Peres Conference Business Real Estate Easy Start Travel Week's End Anglo File
A League of Democracies?
By Robert Skidelsky
Tags: John McCain

Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, has been calling for the creation of a "League of Democracies." This new international group would possess a formidable military capacity, based partly on NATO and partly on a "new quadrilateral security partnership" in the Pacific among Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Neither Russia nor China, of course, would be invited to join: Indeed, McCain wants to exclude Russia from the G8.

The league is necessary, argues McCain, because in matters vital to the U.S., such as fighting Islamic terrorism, humanitarian intervention, and spreading liberty, democracy and free markets, America and its democratic partners must be able to act without permission from the United Nations (that is, from Russia and China). In other words, the league's main purpose would be to marginalize Russia and China in world affairs.

The most damning criticism of McCain's plan is that it would launch a new cold war between states labeled democracies and autocracies. This is not only dangerous, but incoherent. Russia and China do not "threaten" the "free world" with a powerful ideology and massive armed forces, as they did during the Cold War. Moreover, the world's democracies are themselves divided on how to deal with Islamic terrorism, or genocide in Darfur: It was France, after all, which led the opposition in the UN Security Council to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
Advertisement
Moreover, on issues like terrorism, nuclear proliferation and climate change, America needs Russia and China. Stigmatizing these states as pariahs will not get them on board. (China must learn to behave "responsibly," McCain declares with breathtaking condescension.) In fact, Russia has mostly cooperated with the U.S. in the "war on terrorism."

Finally, the idea is impracticable. One cannot imagine India or Brazil wanting to be part of any such combination. So we would all spare ourselves an awful lot of trouble if McCain's brainchild were buried as quickly as possible.

Yet underlying this idea is a serious proposition, to which Britain's former prime minister, Tony Blair, often gave eloquent expression: Democracies don't fight each other, so if the whole world were democratic, wars would stop. Presumably, McCain's league of democracies is designed to bring Immanuel Kant's dream of perpetual peace closer to realization by putting pressure on non-democracies to change their ways, by force if necessary.

Leave aside the fact that efforts to make democracy bloom have become bloodily unstuck in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is it true that democracies never fight each other? The affirmative answer seems to depend on two separate claims.

The first is that, historically, democracies have never fought each other. This is true of a rather small group of rich countries, mainly in Western Europe and its overseas offshoots, since World War II. Moroever, they are "our kind" of democracy - constitutional democracies containing all the features we take for granted in modern Western systems, not "Islamic democracies" like Iran. A reasonable generalization from this rather small sample would be that "prosperous and constitutional democracies tend to live in peace with each other."

The second claim is that these countries live in peace because they are democracies. But has democracy brought them peace and prosperity, or have peace and prosperity brought democracy? Is it democracy that has kept Europe peaceful since 1945, or is it the long period of peace since 1945 that has allowed democracy to become the European norm?

The world already has a peace-maintaining institution. The UN was created under rules designed to enable states of different political colors to live together. Members accept the obligation not to use force except in self-defense or when authorized by the Security Council. The U.S. is frustrated by not being able to get its way at the UN. But the UN exists to protect all states from lawless behavior, including by the U.S. By implicitly bypassing the UN and dividing the world into two armed camps, the league of democracies would increase the risk of war.

The world also already has a prosperity-spreading mechanism. It is called trade. In 1994, the World Trade Organization was created to liberalize trade under agreed-upon rules. It is full of faults which need to be corrected. But we don't need a League of Democracies to do this. By subjecting trade relations to embargoes, sanctions and tests of democracy, environmental standards and human rights, the league is likely to retard the growth of trade, and thus the chance for poor non-democracies to catch up.

The only purpose of the league of democracies seems to be to legitimize war-making by democracies - in order to spread democracy! This is the thrust of McCain's message. As he put it, the U.S. was built for a purpose - to serve "eternal and universal principles." Its God-given task is to build an "enduring global peace on the foundations of freedom, security, prosperity, and hope."

Noble rhetoric! But if that is meant to be the league's purpose - and I see no other - then it is a danger to peace. This is because its advocates believe that no long-term coexistence with non-democracies is possible. This is crazy and unhistorical. It is up to the chastened nations of Western Europe, which broadly share American values but have learned something about political patience, to rein in the American fantasy of remaking the world in its own image.

I am all for spreading Western-style democracy, but not at the cost of making the world more warlike. Peaceful coexistence between different political systems is an attainable objective, and one to which all the world's major powers can sign up.

Robert Skidelsky, a member of the British House of Lords, is professor emeritus of political economy at Warwick University and a board member of the Moscow School of Political Studies.

Copyright Project Syndicate.
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Haniyeh's plea
Hamas leader in Gaza says rocket fire must stop for sake of Palestinians.
Softening position
Shin Bet agrees to free prisoners 'with blood on their hands' for Shalit.
 Read & React
Iran military chief says Israel can't stop nuclear program
Responses: 149
Top Hamas official: We'll stop anyone who breaks Gaza truce
Responses: 212
Shin Bet agrees to free prisoners 'with blood on their hands' for Shalit
Responses: 126
'Dutch Jimmy Carter' accuses Israel of terrorism in new book
Responses: 238
Amos Shocken: Citizenship law makes Israel an apartheid state
Responses: 196


More Headlines
22:50 Abducted soldier's wife: Sunday's cabinet vote may be last chance
18:20 Iran military chief says Israel can't stop nuclear program
12:31 Palestinians say 17-year-old shot dead by IDF troops in West Bank
18:24 Barack Obama to travel to Europe, Mideast this summer
01:05 Peer shocks Safina to slide into Wimbledon quarterfinals
22:51 German Prof.: Israeli athletes willfully sacrificed themselves in Munich massacre
19:01 Jordan, Canada sign memorandum for civilian nuclear cooperation
13:45 Turkish academic fired for likening Turks in Europe to Jews under Nazis
18:27 UEFA probing claims of Croatian fans' Nazi chants
16:05 Egyptian police kill African man, 7-year-old girl at Israel border
13:41 Iran state media: Man on trial for allegedly spying for Israel
10:13 NYPD arrests 4 black teens for stoning bus full of Jewish toddlers
Previous Editions
Special Offers
Advertisement
SAVE TALIA!
and hundreds of cancer patients around the world
Holyland Park
Jerusalem Apartment Tower World Class Luxury
In the heart of Tel-Aviv
The Meier on Rothschild tower
Jerusalem of Gold
Luxury apartments in Jerusalem's finest location
Your vacation starts here
Israel Travel Center Guaranteed Lowest Rates
Hebrew Summer courses
From $39.95
Pardes Institute Summer Sessions
http://www.pardes.org.il/
Free the Palestinians from:
Corrupt Kleptocracy, Tyrannical Theocracy, Abysmal Anarchy
Fattal Hotel Chain
Perfectly located hotels on best resorts of Israel.
ISRAEL BONDS Build Israel
Israel bonds - a multi-purpose way to celebrate Israel's 60th
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on all online reservations
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Underground | Site rules |
Real Estate in Israel | Travel to Israel with Haaretz | Hotels Israel | Restaurants Israel | Tourist attractions Israel | Shops Israel
birthright Israel
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved