Subscribe to Print Edition | Tue., April 29, 2008 Nisan 24, 5768 | | Israel Time: 10:08 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
  Back to Homepage
Rosner's Domain
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Advertising
Books Arts & Leisure Business Real Estate Easy Start Travel Week's End Anglo File
Last update - 10:05 29/04/2008
Think tank proposes bill to define IDF-government relations
By Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondent
Tags: Lebanon 

A group of experts from the Institute for National Security Studies has drawn up a draft law which defines, for the first time, the nature of the relationship between the government and the Israel Defense Forces, and the division of powers and responsibility between the two bodies. In its report on the Second Lebanon War, the Winograd Committee said the lack of such organizational clarity was a "structural weakness" which "critically" needed repair.

The proposed law, which was sent to Haaretz, will be disseminated among cabinet ministers and Knesset members in the near future.

The INSS proposal touches upon a range of issues, such as the declaration of war, setting strategic goals and defining what types of authorization IDF operations in enemy territory require. "It gives leeway to leaders to act in accordance with their job requirements," Dr. Shmuel Even, a senior research fellow at the INSS, explained. "The main problems we have identified lay in the executive branch's inspection of the army. That's where the vacuum exists."
Advertisement
In 1974, the Agranat Commission - appointed to investigate the circumstances that led to the Yom Kippur War - wrote that the relationship between the army and the executive branch needed to be set in law. As a result, a Basic Law was passed in 1976 that officially subjected the army to the government and defense minister, but the law is believed by many to be too vague and general.

In comparison, a law passed a few years ago that defines the relations between the government and the Shin Bet security service goes into much deeper detail. According to the INSS, their proposal will complement the existing Basic Law and determine which responsibilities are placed under the authority of which government officials with regard to the army.

The existing Basic Law does not mention by name the position of the prime minister, though certain military operations require his direct authorization. The Winograd Committee considered the army to be placed under the authority of the defense minister and prime minister, though such an interpretation lacks any factual basis in law.

Another issue the INSS proposal addresses is the Basic Law's definition of the Israel Defense Forces as a "the state's army." It claims the army's purpose should be clearly defined as "defending the State of Israel, its citizens and suzerainty; to carry out any legal order given to it by the government to ensure state security and peace for its citizens." The INSS experts say their definitions are flexible and lawmakers and army officials may want to add or subtract clauses from the proposal.

Lebanon's lessons learned

Even says that the idea to draw up the proposed law and campaign for its legislation was influenced by the government's conduct during the Second Lebanon War.

"A few months before the war we had a very strong trio that included a prime minister, defense minister and chief of staff who were very professional and knowledgeable in security matters," Even said. "Then, during the war we had a different trio who lacked elementary knowledge, and this requires regulation by law. If we are satisfied with leaving it to the government, then it might disappear. This way, they will understand their responsibilities and what they need to know when they are appointed"

Former National Security Council director, Major General (res.) Giora Eiland, and Zvia Gross, a former legal aide to the Defense Ministry, were also part of the team that drafted the proposal. A senior IDF official who has read the draft believes the army will accept most of its suggestions. Yet experts believe the IDF is comfortable with the current situation which does not impose legalities that narrows its method of conduct with the executive branch.

"The executive branch in charge of the IDF must take more of an interest in what goes on inside the army and has to treat the chief-of-staff like a managing director," Even warned. "On most issues the chief-of-staff decides for himself and only in a few percent of incidents are they brought to the ministers' attention - but the government must not avoid its duty of defining what it should deal with."

Related articles:
  • Uzi Benziman / Let democracy triumph
  • Ari Shavit / A suspicious failure
  • Yoel Marcus / Hold the guillotine
  • Olmert's war policy / What did Olmert and Peretz discuss?
  • Bookmark to del.icio.us  
     
    Obscene gestures
    Alleged 'Heil Hitler' comment lands German lawyer Horst Mahler in court
    AMOS-3 video
    Israel's sophisticated new communications satellite launched into orbit.
     Read & React
    Amos Harel: IDF acting as if no truce wih Hamas on horizon
    Responses: 27
    Israel: UNIFIL hiding info about Hezbollah from Security Council
    Responses: 220
    Barak: Hamas is to blame for deaths in the Gaza Strip
    Responses: 612
    Settlers to move into East Jerusalem police HQ compound
    Responses: 92
    Rosner's Domain
    Rosner's Guest, Ziad Asali: Abbas left Washington less than satisfied
    Aipac case appeal: June 2nd (WTR)
    McCain, a foreign-policy schizophrenic (WTR)
    Poll: Will the new spy case harm U.S.-Israel ties?


    More Headlines
    10:07 Qassam hits Sderot home; residents treated for shock
    09:20 Israel, Hamas trade blame over civilian deaths in Gaza
    09:46 ANALYSIS / IDF behaving as if there is no truce on horizon
    10:05 Think tank proposes bill to define IDF-government relations
    09:42 When the first draft of history fails the test of time
    05:07 Israel braces for criticism of Gaza policies from donor nations
    10:04 Head of Damascus think tank handling Israel track for Syria
    05:16 'A hero who did not seek acts of heroism'
    05:24 Breakaway Pensioners agree to represent Gaydamak in Knesset
    22:26 Lebanese army: 12 IAF jets fly over Beirut, Lebanese areas
    02:25 CIA Chief: Syrian reactor had capacity to make 2 weapons a year
    10:00 Russian-Jewish billionaire to build U.K.'s priciest mansion
    10:03 Iran official warns of 'danger' of Barbie, Harry Potter toys
    Previous Editions
    Special Offers
    Advertisement
    Learn Hebrew online
    with Israel's best teachers Sign up for a trial lesson today
    Pardes Institute Summer Sessions
    Study Jewish texts and issues in Jerusalem, Co-ed, All Levels
    Free the Palestinians from:
    Corrupt Kleptocracy, Tyrannical Theocracy, Abysmal Anarchy
    Fattal Hotel Chain
    Perfectly located hotels on best resorts of Israel.
    ISRAEL BONDS Build Israel
    Israel bonds - a multi-purpose way to celebrate Israel's 60th
    Eldan Rent a Car
    Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on all online reservations
    Junkyard
    Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
    Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Underground | Site rules |
    Real Estate in Israel
    Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
    © Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved