Policy in no-man's-land - Haaretz

Subscribe to Print Edition

Fri., October 26, 2007 Cheshvan 14, 5768

Israel Time: 10:57 (EST+7)

web haaretz.com

Back to Homepage

Print Edition

Diplomacy

Defense

Arts & Leisure

Real Estate

Jewish World

National

Advertising

Magazine

Week's End

Business

Opinion

Rosner's Domain

Anglo File

Books

Travel

del.icio.us

Digg It! new

Last update - 09:24 25/10/2007

Policy in no-man's-land

By Aluf Benn

PARIS - Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's trip to Europe this week once again illustrated that the "peace process" is the most convenient diplomatic situation for Israel. Conducting high-level talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority; Israel's willingness to discuss the principles for ending the conflict; and gestures such as the release of prisoners are in themselves sufficient to remove international pressure on Israel to withdraw from the territories and to end the occupation.

At the same time, as long as it's all talk and there are no agreements or decisions that involve the evacuation of territories and the settlements, there is no internal pressure on the government either. The coalition continues to function and is not confronting demonstrations and protest from the right.

Olmert is well aware of that, and his policy is to march in the no-man's-land between talk and action. In all of his appearances in Paris and in London, Olmert lowered expectations regarding the Annapolis summit. "It's not a summit," he said repeatedly. What is it? "When you say summit you think of several days of discussions and negotiations between the participants. That is not the goal of the meeting in Annapolis, which from the beginning was to create an environment that will encourage direct talks." In other words, a photo op of statesmen expressing support for the "two-state solution" without discussing its content.

	Advertisement

According to Olmert, the joint declaration to be presented at the summit will relate to all the "core issues," but will not offer solutions - only guidelines for detailed negotiations later on. And even if an agreement is achieved in the future, its implementation will be subject to the "road map." In other words, in the initial stage, ending Palestinian terror.

To translate the diplomatic language, Olmert is saying the following: I am responding to international expectations and talking to Mahmoud Abbas, although it is clear to me and to him that the situation on the ground will not change as a result of these talks. If I present a "diplomatic horizon" to the Fatah leaders, they may have a chance of surviving on the West Bank. And even if they fall and Hamas takes control of Ramallah, Nablus and Hebron, Israel will not be to blame. Meanwhile, we must not rush with negotiations, and implementation must be postponed, so that my coalition will not fall apart and my government will have an agenda.

Upon his return from Europe, Olmert is able to chalk up a victory. Nicolas Sarkozy and Gordon Brown adopted his message, and only encouraged him to continue with the rapprochement and the gestures to Abbas, and offered "support and involvement in the process." According to all the signs, Olmert did not hear any criticism of the settlements and the separation fence.

The media in France and Britain ignored Olmert almost completely; his meetings with the Jewish communities took place in half-empty halls; and in the streets there was not even a sign of the handful of demonstrators who greeted Ariel Sharon with posters in favor of Palestine. We can conclude from this that as long as there is no crisis, the "world" is not interested in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict or its solution. It is satisfied that the sides are talking to each other. The general consensus that Abbas is weak and cannot deliver is preventing pressure on Israel for the time being.

In the internal Israeli arena, the prevailing feeling that "nothing will come of it" also helps the prime minister. The Annapolis summit and the talks preceding it are arousing absolutely no public interest. The opposition on the right and the left is silent. Olmert says that the coalition will get through the Annapolis summit successfully, and that "when the time comes" the future agreement will enjoy the support of most of the Jews in Israel.

He is not the first to benefit from the convenience of an ongoing "peace process" whose end is unknown - "There are no sacred dates," said Yitzhak Rabin. They used to say in condemnation of Israel that this policy is a plot designed to anesthetize international public opinion, and to cover for the expansion of the settlements and the devouring of lands. But Olmert, as opposed to his predecessors, declared from the very beginning that he wanted to leave the territories. He does not sanctify a single rock or hill. His motives are different: He wants to remain in power and to maintain broad political support for his diplomatic steps.

The only question is how long he can continue to march this way in no-man's-land, until the indifference turns into disappointment - which will increase the danger of a flare-up with the Palestinians, or could once again ignite the internal debate.

Bookmark to del.icio.us


	For their grandparents
	Many young Israelis are honoring their grandparents' pre-Shoah communities.


	Something fishy here...
	Amnon Levy's candid camera show catches frozen fish importer adjusting sell-by dates.




1.	No-mans land is exactly where Israel wants it to be	09:45	\|	Natallie Durson	25/10/07

2.	Olmert as a representative for the Israeli "disease"	10:01	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

3.	#2 more total crap from dino he knows how to mix oil and water	10:38	\|	victor hardman	25/10/07

4.	Palestinian problem not core issue	11:01	\|	Jonathan S	25/10/07

5.	The sting is always in the tail	11:06	\|	Johnboy	25/10/07

6.	#3 Victor plonks his hubris on the table for all to see.	11:16	\|	Johnboy	25/10/07

7.	The real reason why the Annapolis Conference is doomed to failure	11:29	\|	Yonatan	25/10/07

8.	Natallie Durson @#1	11:30	\|	akiva (zionist)	25/10/07

9.	#6 its the upside down feeling in oz for johnboy	12:05	\|	victor hardman	25/10/07

10.	# 7 Yonatan	12:08	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

11.	Johnboy, not a racist loonie.	12:27	\|	akiva (zionist)	25/10/07

12.	# 2 Swiss	12:51	\|	Lynn	25/10/07

13.	# 10 Swiss	13:01	\|	Lynn	25/10/07

14.	# 12/# 13 Lynn	13:35	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

15.	Swiss Dino	14:00	\|	Danite	25/10/07

16.	Policy in the Land of Israel	14:06	\|	Yaacov Carmelli	25/10/07

17.	# 15 Danite	14:17	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

18.	Natalie has it part-right......	15:13	\|	Philip	25/10/07

19.	Aluf Benn perhaps is mistaken on Olmert`s intentions	16:31	\|	Smadar	25/10/07

20.	Swiss dont evade	17:20	\|	Danite	25/10/07

21.	# 20 Danite Don`t be choleric, not good for your health......	17:40	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

22.	Israel is no partner for peace.	17:49	\|	Deborah	25/10/07

23.	Swiss makes threats	18:04	\|	Danite	25/10/07

24.	both Arabs and Israelis..	18:24	\|	khairi janbek	25/10/07

25.	Who does then Abbas walk hand in hand in no-man`s land?	18:29	\|	Fortuna Benmayor	25/10/07

26.	Slow and steady makes for good long-term investment	18:31	\|	Jason	25/10/07

27.	#21 Swiss (Dino) re: Danite	19:04	\|	Smadar	25/10/07

28.	Idle talk	19:12	\|	Dan Chazan	25/10/07

29.	# 23 Not "arrogance", Danite......	19:13	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

30.	Are the opponents of peace justified?	19:39	\|	Dan Chazan	25/10/07

31.	Status Quo At All Cost.	19:44	\|	chet	25/10/07

32.	# 27 Smadar	19:59	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

33.	Benn - Impatient for More Phony, Appeasement Deals	20:46	\|	Tod Zuckerman	25/10/07

34.	# 27 Smadar, by the way.....	21:18	\|	Swiss (Dino)	25/10/07

35.	Swiss	21:28	\|	Danite	25/10/07

36.	Swiss and recovery	21:41	\|	Danite	25/10/07

37.	resting on the status quo	22:56	\|	christoph	25/10/07

38.	Aluf Benn, Olmert should count his blessings !	23:44	\|	Dutch	25/10/07

39.	#9 Victor hasn`t read the Saudi Plan, obviously.	08:17	\|	Johnboy	26/10/07

40.	#11 Come on, akiva (war-mongering zionist)..	08:26	\|	Johnboy	26/10/07

Today Online


	Experts: Syria cleared site hit by IAF in effort to hide evidence
	Responses: 57


	Palestinians set fire to West Bank synagogue for second time
	Responses: 16


	Editorial: Those who oppose Iran sanctions will get military force
	Send response


	Shin Bet blocked Palestinian cancer patient from treatment
	Responses: 269


	Israel Harel: The 'human shield' practice can save lives
	Responses: 157

Rosner's Domain

* Republican leaders aren't happy with Bush's peace process

* Is Haaretz really better than the New York Times?

* WTR: A Syrian nuclear plan has a kind of logic

* Poll: Were you convinced that the surge is working?

More Headlines
10:47 Majadele: Israel ready to return Golan for peace


07:58 Three militants killed, two IDF troops wounded in Gaza Strip


09:34 Palestinians set fire to West Bank synagogue for second time


10:35 Experts: Syria cleared site hit by IAF, apparently to hide evidence


06:44 Archbishop of Canterbury to visit Israel, meet chief rabbis


04:58 Olmert, Abbas to discuss gaps on framework for peace summit


06:26 ANALYSIS: Israel's real intention behind sanctions on Gaza Strip


02:46 Russian officials, in Israel, downplay Iranian nuke threat


05:42 Some of PM's defense talks before last year's war went unrecorded