No one in Kadima is asking if J'lem will be divided, just how - Haaretz

Subscribe to Print Edition

Sun., September 23, 2007 ,

Israel Time: 02:28 (EST+7)

web haaretz.com

Back to Homepage

Print Edition

Diplomacy

Defense

Arts & Leisure

Real Estate

Jewish World

National

Advertising

Magazine

Week's End

Business

Opinion

Rosner's Domain

Anglo File

Books

Travel

del.icio.us

Digg It! new

No one in Kadima is asking if J'lem will be divided, just how

By Nadav Shragai

Serious differences of opinion have erupted in Kadima over the possibility that the agreement of principles Israel is now negotiating with the Palestinians will determine the final-status deal on Jerusalem.

Seven years after the Camp David summit in 2000 and the cabinet's subsequent decision to adopt, with reservations, then U.S. president Bill Clinton's plan to divide the capital, no one in Kadima is asking if Jerusalem will be redivided. The only question is how it will be redivided.

Vice Premier Haim Ramon is promoting a plan to Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayad in which almost all Palestinian neighborhoods of East Jerusalem would be subtracted from the Israeli city and become part of a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem. The areas inhabited by Jews, including the new neighborhoods south, north and east of the Green Line that divided the city until 1967, will remain under Israel's jurisdiction.

	Advertisement

The plan would also divide the Old City between Israeli and Palestinian sovereignty, with the Muslim and Christian Quarters under Palestinian rule, and the Armenian and Jewish Quarters under Israeli rule. Sovereignty over the Temple Mount would be divided between Palestinians and Jews as well.

Ramon proposes handing over three neighborhoods soon after the agreement of principles is signed, if Israel is convinced that the Palestinian Authority can control them: Shuafat, in northern Jerusalem, near Pisgat Ze'ev and Atarot; Suahra, on the edge of the Judean desert; and Wallijeh, a village near the Massuah neighborhood overlooking the railway to Tel Aviv.

In recent weeks, however, a counter-coalition inside Kadima has sprung up, headed by MK Otniel Schneller. Schneller is unwilling to give up Israeli sovereignty over the Old City and the Temple Mount, but will accept religious management of the holy sites. He is also willing to give up neighborhoods on the outskirts of the city - mostly to the north, such as Al-Ram, Qalandiyah and Kafr Akeb (most of which are already outside the separation fence) - as well as parts of a few other neighborhoods.

However, Schneller stays away from calling his plan "division." He will not accept any substantial concession on the Temple Mount and demands that in the final Jerusalem arrangement, space be allocated on the Temple Mount for Jewish prayer - a demand former prime minister Ehud Barak raised at Camp David in 2000.

Schneller believes that decisions about the future of Jerusalem should be made by representatives of the entire Jewish people, not just the Israeli public. He also believes that if the Ramon plan is adopted, Kadima will disintegrate, as many parliamentarians will be unable to support it.

Kadima's mayoral candidate in the capital, businessman Nir Barkat, has already said that he is considering leaving the party due to the Ramon plan. Barkat wrote to Ramon this week saying that he had not been authorized by either the government or the party to propose plans on Jerusalem, and that Jerusalem and the rest of the country are entitled to know if this is the new Kadima position, and whether Ramon is acting on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's authority.

That, in a nutshell, is the key question: What does Olmert think? Back when he was mayor of Jerusalem, Olmert rejected any proposal for division - of the Temple Mount, the Old City or East Jerusalem as a whole. But Olmert is remaining mum, and his associates say that Ramon has permission but not authority.

Many politicians believe this obscurantist formula means that Olmert is using Ramon's plan as a trial balloon. If it does not explode, Olmert is likely to adopt large sections of the plan.

The battle inside Kadima over whether Jerusalem will be divided has already been decided. The question now is how - and also whether the party, as Ramon has, will call the spade a spade: division.

Bookmark to del.icio.us


	Carmel pleasures
	Sweet olives, Sauvignon and Merlot: touring in the footsteps of Baron Rothschild.


	Subduing artists
	If MK Orlev cannot beat the 'leftists, ' he can at least make their lives miserable.

Today Online


	N.Y. Mayor: Columbia can ask Ahmadinejad to speak, I won't attend
	Responses: 569


	For the first time, Iran directly confronts Israel on nuclear arms
	Responses: 402


	M.J. Rosenberg: U.S. pro-Israel lobby is not always good for Israel
	Responses: 190


	Report: Israel, U.S. shared Syria-N. Korea nuclear intelligence
	Responses: 99


	Kadima members disagree over how to divide J'lem
	Responses: 125


	Israeli in Lebanon under investigation on espionage charges
	Responses: 106

More Headlines
01:59 U.S. to invite Syria, Lebanon to Mideast peace summit


01:57 Explosives belt designated for holiday attack found in Tel Aviv apartment


20:55 Israeli in Lebanon under investigation in muder case and on espionage charges


22:15 IAF dispatches jets as Syrian plane disappears from radar


17:00 For the first time, Iran directly confronts Israel on nuclear arms


18:19 PA: Gazans who paid hajj fee to Hamas won't travel to Mecca


22:44 Kalansua man shoots dead one, wounds three in brawl


17:47 Grant's qualifications as Chelsea Football Club head questioned


22:56 Eight-year-old girl hit by ATV in Kfar Tavor, dies of wounds