The Winograd Committee has still not decided who is likely to be harmed by its conclusions, according to a statement it made to the Supreme Court

Attorney Zvi Agmon, representing the committee, appeared before the court in a preliminary proceeding before the scheduled deliberations Tuesday of the Military Advocate General's petitions against the committee.

The Military Advocate General and former MK Avraham Poraz filed petitions against the committee's initial refusal to grant people whose careers may be harmed by its conclusions the chance to respond before its final report on the handling of the Second Lebanon War is published.