Subscribe to Print Edition | Mon., August 27, 2007 Elul 13, 5767 | | Israel Time: 22:09 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
  Back to Homepage
Print Edition
Diplomacy
Defense Arts & Leisure Real Estate Jewish World National Advertising
Magazine Week's End Business Opinion Rosner's Domain Anglo File Travel Sports
del.icio.us
Digg It!  new
Last update - 12:10 25/08/2007
So dynamic, the dynamics of revival
By Jonathan Spyer

In a recent article in the British Guardian newspaper, Ed Husain, a former member of the radical Islamist Hizb ut Tahrir organization [which aims to bring about a worldwide Muslim state], sought to draw a parallel between Zionism and radical Islam. The movements were, Husain claimed, "both political perversions of ancient Abrahamic faiths of Judaism and Islam." Husain's simplistic claim was made possible by his near-total lack of knowledge of Zionism, the issue of Jewish peoplehood, the vexed issue of secular and religious Jewish identity, and so on. However, the claim is an interesting one, and closer observation of it offers clues as to the dynamics governing the current clash between Israel and radical Islamism, and the likely outcome of the contest.

Both Zionism and radical Islam are, self-consciously, movements of "revival." They have the following aspect in common, which underlies the tremendous strength of the loyalties to which both have been able to inspire in their followers: They have been able to reach back to motifs, stories and beliefs preceding modernity, which were at the core of the identities of the people to whom they wished to appeal. Here lies the difference between these two movements and, for example, the communism and radical socialism of the 20th century on the other. The latter two preached a radical break with the past, and celebrated an unfamiliar, imagined future. Zionism and Islamism, by contrast, both draw on the deep currents of identification and loyalty felt by Jews and Muslims to their respective traditions and history.

The result of this deeper anchoring are plain to see: The movements of secular utopia produced by modernity have largely been eclipsed and disappeared. Movements of "revival," meanwhile, have proven one of the most durable and powerful form of political gathering of the last two centuries. They are able to enlist much of what is most dear to human beings for their purpose: cultural memory, personal identity, the magic of myth, the notion of "renewing the days of old."

Advertisement
Of course, it is not only Zionism and Islamism which are able, each in their respective contexts, to draw on these powerful sources. To a greater or lesser degree, all modern nationalist movements do the same. Sunni Islamism, at least in the Middle East, functions as a kind of religious nationalism, made more powerful than its secular Arab nationalist counterpart by its ability to unambiguously draw upon the markers of loyalty of a traditional, conservative and religious society.

This mobilizing ability of ancient traditions and stories is empirically irrefutable. It is also ethically neutral. It includes Winston Churchill in 1940, mining the symbols and markers of a shared sense of Englishness, to mobilize his countrymen to sacrifice in order to oppose the most evil tyranny known to history. But it also includes the Hitler tyranny itself, which knew no less well how to draw on German dreams, grievances and loyalties for a very different project. Revivalism can be the carrier of many things.

In the case of Zionism and Israel, the singular achievement, underlying success, has been the ability to combine the archaic with the ultra-modern. The Zionist movement, and the State of Israel which it established have been able to fuse the immense mobilizing power of Jewish identity, with the mechanics of modern, democratic statehood and a free economy. Radical Islam, of both Sunni and Shi'ite varieties, on the other hand, has at least for the moment proven unable to perform a similar feat. Rather, this trend, which is in itself largely a response to the failure of earlier, secular forms of political organization to deliver economic and social progress, shows no signs of being able to be the vehicle for such development.

As a revival movement, it has the ability to tap into deep-seated loyalties, and to produce large numbers of young men willing to offer their lives. But if the evidence of Islamism in power - from Sudan to Teheran to Gaza - is anything to go by, the closed dogmatic thinking of the Islamists cannot allow the freedom upon which successful development depends. The Islamic republic of Iran is the longest-living experiment in radical Islam with sovereignty now in existence. Yet for all the murderous rhetoric and chilling ambition of the Iranian regime, it should not be forgotten that the mullahs preside over a rickety, corruption-riven, dysfunctional state, and rule largely because of their ability to inspire (well-justified) fear in their own population. Regarding other experiments in Islamist rule, in Gaza, in Sudan, the case is yet clearer.

From the point of view of Israel and its western allies, this of course bodes well. We are going to have to spend a very great amount of time and blood and treasure in the foreseeable future building ramparts against the attacks of adherents of Islamic revival. But for as long as Jewish nationhood is embedded in the solid structures of economic and technological development, while its Islamist enemies can root their own ambitions only in dysfunction and failure, the results of the contest, bloody though it be, are not in doubt.

The writer is a senior research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Center at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya.

More Jewish World news and features
Bookmark to del.icio.us
Not in my back yard
Residents and city officials in Herzliya, Ranaana say a new road will hurt property values.
Young achievers
Around 100 young Israelis from all walks of life just finished a two week leadership camp.
  1.   Radical Islam arose from two issues 11:49  |  Natallie Durson 24/08/07
  2.   Shame on the US for fanning the flames of 12:41  |  Julien 24/08/07
  3.   Zionist israel is a success because of the preponderant influence 12:45  |  lakshmi 24/08/07
  4.   Response to Natalie 12:48  |  FranklinBluth 24/08/07
  5.   "worldwide Muslim state" = Islamic imperialism 13:04  |  Hal 24/08/07
  6.   A fundamental error in Islam is: coercion 13:09  |  Hal 24/08/07
  7.   Jonathan Spyer 13:09  |  Walid 24/08/07
  8.   Socialism did not necessarily break from the past 13:13  |  Joe 24/08/07
  9.   RELIGIOUS ZIONISTS ARE THE MODERATES! 13:18  |  AV 24/08/07
  10.   7Walid,see my post 3 for a forward looking assessment of the 13:38  |  lakshmi 24/08/07
  11.   fundamentalists are all the same 14:04  |  Mark B. 24/08/07
  12.   Walid, I understood Spyer as saying ... 14:08  |  Hal 24/08/07
  13.   # there is no coercion in Islam. 14:12  |  KMS 24/08/07
  14.   Funny, Muslims are guilty of all these things 14:14  |  Joe 24/08/07
  15.   The Jewish "revivalists", Religious Zionists, are the moderates 14:25  |  AV 24/08/07
  16.   Fundamentalists are NOT all the same 14:30  |  AV 24/08/07
  17.   "Maybe some ignorant Muslims practice coercion" 14:32  |  Hal 24/08/07
  18.   #10 kms says there is no yolk in an egg!! 14:37  |  victor hardman 24/08/07
  19.   Joe 14:37  |  KMS 24/08/07
  20.   Natalie and Jonathan Speyer 14:38  |  Brian Freund 24/08/07
  21.   To me, Islam seems like an evil ideology. 14:41  |  Joe 24/08/07
  22.   #1 Natallie Durson knows all the amswers, but 14:43  |  Jak 24/08/07
  23.   Radical Islam of Natalie (1) 15:06  |  I. Barr 24/08/07
  24.   ARABS WILL CATCH UP WHEN THEY LEARN 15:09  |  CRYING ARAB 24/08/07
  25.   11Joe,hardly true about the zionist enterprise & the plight of 15:17  |  lakshmi 24/08/07
  26.   Invalid comparison/contrast! 15:18  |  Mirqa 24/08/07
  27.   The Jewish "revivalists", the Religious Zionists, are moderates 15:21  |  AV 24/08/07
  28.   4Franklin Bluth,the early Palestinian resistance to 19th century 15:23  |  lakshmi 24/08/07
  29.   Zionism is not a revival movement 15:25  |  I. Barr 24/08/07
  30.   #16 "Religious Zionists are Moderates" 15:49  |  Mirqa 24/08/07
  31.   fundamentalism is the common evil 15:56  |  michael 24/08/07
  32.   To Natallie Durson 15:57  |  A College Professor 24/08/07
  33.   Religious Zionists 16:03  |  John 24/08/07
  34.   Response @18 AV, what`s in a word 16:10  |  Mark B. 24/08/07
  35.   Correction: Post #26 is a response to AV #25, not #16 16:25  |  Mirqa 24/08/07
  36.   Correction: POST #28 is a response to AV #25, not #16! 16:27  |  Mirqa 24/08/07
  37.   #11 Joe "Muslims.... 16:33  |  Jim 24/08/07
  38.   Religious Zionists are modern, pluralistic, and diverse 16:38  |  AV 24/08/07
  39.   The most "fundamentalist" people I have met: Secular Humanists 16:51  |  Hal 24/08/07
  40.   Walid 16:54  |  Danite 24/08/07
  41.   More killed in the name of Secular ideologies than religious 16:55  |  AV 24/08/07
  42.   #16 AV Fundies are NOT all the same. 16:56  |  Jim 24/08/07
  43.   And secular people like Jim are looking into the mirror ... 16:58  |  Joe 24/08/07
  44.   A-plus, college professor #32 17:10  |  Polybios 24/08/07
  45.   # 23 Barr 17:20  |  Jim 24/08/07
  46.   Total nonesence from a left wing talking head puppet 17:29  |  pace306 24/08/07
  47.   First Sensible Post By Durson In A While 17:33  |  Yosemite 24/08/07
  48.   Hal 17:33  |  Walid 24/08/07
  49.   Do not put the two on same moral plane 17:36  |  Walter 24/08/07
  50.   Jeffrey Dahmer and Mother Teresa both breathed air!!! 17:45  |  Polybios 24/08/07
  51.   KMS #10 18:04  |  Polybios 24/08/07
  52.   "They are right and the rest of the world is wrong" 18:05  |  AV 24/08/07
  53.   Any ideology becomes evil if more important than human life 18:08  |  AV 24/08/07
  54.   Canaanites, Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites 18:15  |  AV 24/08/07
  55.   Jews are the aborigines of Judea and have EVERY right to be there 18:19  |  AV 24/08/07
  56.   I agree with Spyer`s point ... 18:28  |  AV 24/08/07
  57.   #31 Michael 18:32  |  Jim 24/08/07
  58.   Natallie Dorson - History by Miss Natallie Dorson (1) 18:35  |  Gil 24/08/07
  59.   Zionism and Arab nationalism are `European` movements 18:36  |  Paul Henzen 24/08/07
  60.   Natallie Dorson - History by Miss Natallie Dorson (2) 18:36  |  Gil 24/08/07
  61.   #46 pace306 From one journalist to another... 19:15  |  Jim 24/08/07
  62.   #37 Jim 19:33  |  Boycott 24/08/07
  63.   61 - dunno - are you a journalist ? 19:40  |  pace306 24/08/07
  64.   Dont you notice the hypocrisy? 19:51  |  Terje 24/08/07
  65.   Don`t discount Hamas as reformers 20:10  |  Tosefta 24/08/07
  66.   Lakshimi 20:39  |  Franklin Bluth 24/08/07
  67.   Natal(l)ie Durson is unfamiliar with the concept of CHRONOLOGY 20:56  |  Jake 24/08/07
  68.   Lakshmi 21:03  |  Walid 24/08/07
  69.   Jim#45 Chuck out your whole list except... 21:06  |  Tzfonit 24/08/07
  70.   Knocking two heads together 21:14  |  Tzfonit 24/08/07
  71.   $ 30 bn aid goes to Israel and economic sanctions on Iran 21:21  |  Abu Hamza 24/08/07
  72.   There is no rational comparison between Zionism & Radical Islam. 21:25  |  Chaim 24/08/07
  73.   Tzfonit 21:34  |  Walid 24/08/07
  74.   No Worries, Walid 21:39  |  Tzfonit 24/08/07
  75.   #13 Coercion in Islam 21:51  |  Michael T 24/08/07
  76.   68Walid & 66 F.Bluth,Walid I am impressed with the Hezbollah move 23:00  |  lakshmi 24/08/07
  77.   Tosefta - Hamas and reform 23:05  |  Mark Lincoln 24/08/07
  78.   Zionizm then and now 23:09  |  Mark Lincoln 24/08/07
  79.   Jake #67 23:21  |  TonyL 24/08/07
  80.   Stupid, stupider, stupidest 23:42  |  Hannah 24/08/07