Bush's Iraq troop surge garners surge in polls - Haaretz

Subscribe to Print Edition

Sun., August 12, 2007 Av 28, 5767

Israel Time: 02:14 (EST+7)

web haaretz.com

Back to Homepage

Print Edition

Diplomacy

Defense

Real Estate

Arts & Leisure

Jewish World

National

Sports

Advertising

Magazine

Week's End

Opinion

Business

Rosner's Domain

Anglo File

Travel

Q&A

del.icio.us

Digg It! new

Bush's Iraq troop surge garners surge in polls

By Shmuel Rosner

WASHINGTON - This may be the sign of a new trend, or simply a summer illusion, but the growing accumulation of evidence can no longer be ignored: Could U.S. President George W. Bush's new strategy in Iraq be working?

There are signs that the American public is seeing positive results. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the results of a Gallup poll, which showed that 31 percent of those asked felt that the infusion of additional troops in Iraq "has improved the situation." This constituted a nearly 10-percent increase. At the same time, there is a drop of nearly 10 percent, from 51 percent to 41 percent, among those who believe that the extra soldiers either have not changed the situation or they have made it worse.

	Advertisement

This would also explain a New York Times poll that indicated a rise - a rise! - in the number of Americans who believe that the invasion of Iraq was justified (from 35 percent to 42 percent). This is such an amazing increase that the daily decided to redo the poll just to be on the safe side. The number of those polled who argued that the decision to invade Iraq was mistaken dropped from 61 percent to 51 percent.

The second most senior Democrat in the Senate, Senator Richard Durbin, congratulated the U.S. troops serving in Iraq on Wednesday, which is nothing new even for those opposed to the war. But what he added to his congratulatory statement had to be read twice to be believed: He said that the activity of the forces on the ground "is showing results." Durbin, in whose party some hoped to force the president to alter his policy in Iraq, is willing to publicly admit that something has improved in the American performance there.

Of course, the American public has not changed its attitude entirely, and Iraq is far from being seen as a smashing success. In an interview to Haaretz on Wednesday, on the eve of his visit to Israel, the House majority leader, Steny Hoyer, a Democrat from Maryland, said that the current policy in Iraq cannot continue. He wants change - but he wants it to come about in a responsible way, one that will not undermine regional stability. Hoyer is among those Democrats who would like to see a redeployment a lot more than a rushed withdrawal.

A congressional aide told Haaretz yesterday that all these signs are merely "a small bump in the road," not a change in the overall trend. Still, he was willing to admit that the bump exists. He also agreed that the withdrawal plan proposed by Democrats fails to answer tough questions.

"What will we do if we redeploy our forces and a massacre takes place? This is a major hole in our plan," he admitted.

Signs of success in Iraq are also contributing to divisions among the Democrats because even the most ardent opponents of the war do not want to appear to be disappointed by success - even partial success - in Iraq.

The renewed willingness to reevaluate what is taking place in Iraq is best seen in an article published in the New York Times two weeks ago by two scholars at the Brookings Institute - a think tank situated on the center-left of the American political spectrum. Kenneth Pollack and Michael O'Hanlon, both well-known and established academics, returned from Iraq and announced that, at least from a military point of view, they were surprised by the American achievements. They suggested that even though victory may not be possible, there is a chance that the final result will retain a stability in Iraq that both the U.S. and the locals can live with.

This article was bolstered by another article written by the military analyst of The Associated Press, who declared that "The New Strategy Works."

For the Bush administration this is welcome news, but for the left in America, cause for vitriolic responses.

The president has a few more weeks to take advantage of the public relations value of the favorable assessments, and perhaps even succeed in reinforcing the image that things have changed. In September, the progress report required from General David Petraeus, commander in Iraq and the man behind the new American strategy, will be presented to Congress. His report will show military gains but also point to failures. Then, the political battle will be joined once more.

Bookmark to del.icio.us


	Green giant
	Yaniv Green's 16 points, 8 rebounds helped Israel beat Ukraine Saturday night.


	Raw catch
	Fresh fish need minimal treatment to become a delicacy worthy of any dinner table.

Today Online


	Arafat's doctor: There was HIV in his blood, but poison killed him
	Responses: 233


	Jerusalem source: Syria worried by Iran's bear hug
	Responses: 67


	Gideon Levy: Failure to uproot Hebron settlers is the real crime
	Responses: 119


	Hamas announces formation of new naval coast guard unit
	Responses: 79


	Carlo Strenger: Peres must address the pain of the religious right
	Responses: 58

More Headlines
22:05 Lantos: Early removal of roadblocks may resusciate terror attacks


22:18 Cabinet votes 21-5 in favor of proposed 2008 State Budget


22:02 Police release security video of Jerusalem shooting attack


02:14 Japan FM to declare renewed aid to PA during Mideast visit


23:26 Company commander who left soldier behind in Gaza receives citation in record


22:39 Report: Hezbollah buying up lands in southern Lebanon


23:15 Jordan mulling cheaper alternative to Red Sea-Dead Sea canal


17:04 Israel probing kickback claims against ambassador to Hungary


14:19 Foreign Minister, Palestinian PM to meet in W. Bank Wednesday


10:06 Sderot residents: Restraint policy on Qassams promoting war of attrition


23:09 Jerusalem source: Syria is worried by Iran's 'bear hug'