Subscribe to Print Edition | Wed., January 20, 2010 Shvat 5, 5770 | | Israel Time: 10:31 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Jewish World Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Focus U.S.A. Strenger than Fiction Business Travel Magazine Week's End Anglo File Books Haaretz Store
Share |
Last update - 08:45 15/01/2010
Israel and the illusion of international justice
By Gerald Steinberg and Anne Herzberg
Tags: Israel news
 

Speaking at a legal conference on January 4, former Supreme Court president Aharon Barak suggested that Israel would benefit from participation in bodies such as the International Criminal Court in order to fight for "its positions and justice." In endorsing Barak's recommendation, a Haaretz editorial ("Join the Court," January 6) contended that such participation would "place Israel on the side of the enlightened nations." Similarly, the argument goes, Israel erred in refusing to cooperate with the UN Human Rights Council's Goldstone Commission and the International Court of Justice proceedings on the security barrier.

While surely well-intentioned, in practice this line of thinking is pure folly. The dominance of nondemocratic and Islamic nations in international organs, and the increasing politicization of these bodies, virtually guarantees that no justice will be done when it comes to Israel or even NATO countries. In such morally corrupt frameworks, international law and human rights have become political weapons, disconnected from legitimate judicial processes and legal systems in democratic societies.

The ICJ's handling of the 2004 case regarding Israel's security barrier is a telling example. The suit was initiated by the UN General Assembly at the behest of the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. European-funded advocacy groups such as B'Tselem, aided by NGO superpowers Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, were central to this effort.
Advertisement
Legal scholars sharply criticized the court for accepting a predetermined political mandate from the UN and for its breach of procedural protocols in deliberations on the matter. The ICJ's resulting advisory opinion negated Israel's right of self-defense and displayed an utter lack of sympathy for terror victims. Its simplistic and troubling legal analysis clearly reflected the influence of the Arab League and politicized NGOs. Hardly an independent judicial inquiry, this distorted proceeding encouraged subversion of the rule of law, rather than its enforcement, by allowing for political manipulation of the judicial process.

Similar problems plague the ICC. Calls for the creation of an ICC were first made in the late 1980s by Caribbean and Latin American countries seeking international support in trying drug traffickers, and were bolstered by the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the mid-1990s. Following a massive push by NGOs, the ICC statute was finalized in Rome in 1998, covering the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, and the court began operations in 2002.

Some complain that the ICC in practice has become an "African court" that lets Western democracies off the hook, but this claim is unjustified. Although NGOs pressed for the ICC to have wide-ranging jurisdiction, it was intended to be a court of last resort for the very worst crimes, adjudicating only those cases that could not be fairly tried in national courts due to the lack of a competent judiciary.

From the beginning, Israel strongly backed the idea of an international court based on the Nuremberg precedent. But, as happened with other international legal bodies, the ICC process was co-opted by nondemocratic forces. Arab and Islamic regimes succeeding in changing the court's statute at the last minute to define Israeli settlement activity as an international crime while omitting terrorism as an offense. This overt politicization of the court forced Israel to withdraw its support.

Following the Gaza war, the PLO pressured ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo to open a case against Israel, even though "Palestine" is not a state and doing so would be a gross violation of the court's treaty. Moreno-Ocampo has admitted to working closely with the Arab League in this process. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, funded primarily by European governments, is also deeply involved in this one-sided effort, as are Amnesty and HRW.

These same Arab League members have hypocritically and repeatedly offered shelter to indicted war criminal Omar Bashir of Sudan, refusing to hand him over to the court to stand trial. Thus the countries that dominate the UN system use their power to control and manipulate its institutions for their own interests - not in pursuit of universal justice.

The careful balance that Justice Barak developed in Israeli jurisprudence in weighing human rights claims against security needs receives no respect from the Arab League and its NGO allies, whose political demands international institutions are unable or unwilling to resist. Barak's wishful thinking to the contrary, it would have made no difference if Israel had participated in the ICJ case or even the Goldstone mission. The record clearly indicates that any information provided by Israel would have been twisted and discounted to fit predetermined conclusions. Claims that Israeli cooperation could have changed the outcome have no basis.

Refusing to be a party to this sort of legal travesty does not mean Israel is insensitive to international law or human rights, or that the Jewish state does not wish to be a member of the international community. Nor should this principled position be used to claim that Israel is trying to shield itself from critical inquiry - far from it. Israel's Supreme Court is a leading adherent and innovator of international law and is a major proponent of human rights.

To suggest that Israel could exert any influence on bodies where nondemocratic regimes wield excessive power, however, is a pipe dream that has no connection to today's unfortunate reality.

Gerald Steinberg is a professor of political science at Bar-Ilan University and president of NGO Monitor; Anne Herzberg is NGO Monitor's legal advisor
PROMOTION: Mamilla Hotel
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Vatican vs. occupation
A Vatican document blames Mideast conflict for driving Christians from the region.
Islam and the Jews
Syria's Mufti tells U.S. scholars that Islam commands its followers to protect Judaism.
  1.   laws are only as good as the judges applying them 09:25  |  Cipora Julianna Kohn 15/01/10
  2.   Muslim States hijacked international courts? 09:50  |  sushi 15/01/10
  3.   International justice is better than Israeli justice. 09:52  |  Michael 15/01/10
  4.   A repugnant article 12:29  |  Roo 15/01/10
  5.   terror and settlements 12:56  |  AB 15/01/10
  6.   same old argument 13:16  |  Noel 15/01/10
  7.   Justice 13:24  |  Froy 15/01/10
  8.   Accountability? 13:39  |  Ussishkin 15/01/10
  9.   Israel can only lose 13:44  |  samos 15/01/10
  10.   The illussion of illusion 13:48  |  O 15/01/10
  11.   Israel has broken Int. Laws but had few choices, none good 22:38  |  Bloodyscot 15/01/10
  12.   Noel and others 22:41  |  Ben 15/01/10
  13.   Steinberg`s only standard is IDF impunity, the rest is nonsense 01:16  |  Shawn Sanders 16/01/10
  14.   Israel 01:53  |  Susan 16/01/10
  15.   Bashir 02:06  |  navido 16/01/10
  16.   illusion 02:59  |  directrob 16/01/10
  17.   The Enlightened Nations and Their People Have Been Seeing Clearer 03:04  |  Oprah 16/01/10
  18.   No Chomsky bull or mamby-pamby arguments here 04:03  |  allang 16/01/10
  19.   allang 12:57  |  John Spear 16/01/10
  20.   allang bull versus chomsky bull 14:28  |  ramiro 16/01/10
  21.   allang bull versus Chomsky bull 17:11  |  ramiro 16/01/10
  22.   allang bull versus Chomsky bull 20:10  |  ramiro 16/01/10
  23.   Ramiro : pull your pants-up... your ignorance is showing 14:34  |  allang 17/01/10
  24.   Making the minority seem the majority 23:22  |  Eyal 19/01/10
Special Offers
Advertisement
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
100% Pure Dead Sea Salt
Lowest price in the U.S.A. for genuine Dead Sea Salts
Best 2010 Passover Vacations
Glatt Kosher Passover programs in Mexico, Arizona and Turnberry Isle Resort in Florida.
Your Aliyah starts here.
Nefesh B'Nefesh Aliyah Workshops and Personal Meetings in your area
Camp Kimama Israel - Summer 2010
An incredible experience with Jewish youth from all over the world
More Headlines
09:23 Israel withholding NGO employees' work permits
08:52 Israel set to become OECD's poorest member
10:00 U.S. indicts four Israelis in international bribery case
10:19 Obama's lost senate seat is a victory for Netanyahu
08:15 Egypt riled by Syria's increasing role in the region
09:20 Netanyahu's maid may prove more influential than Obama
09:21 Accused child molester wins first battle against extradition to U.S.
09:30 You decide: Who was your Person of the Decade?
00:15 TV ROUND-UP: Israeli rescue team to stay in Haiti for another month
05:58 30 countries joined Israel in mass bio-terror drill
23:10 U.S.: Iran reply to nuclear deal is inadequate
10:31 Floods cause millions in damage to Israel's agricultural resources
06:42 Does it pay to sue for libel in Israel?
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Site rules |
| Advert: Recommended Restaurants | Makom: Engaging on Israel
| Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved