Subscribe to Print Edition | Sun., December 27, 2009 Tevet 10, 5770 | | Israel Time: 15:08 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Jewish World Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Focus U.S.A. Strenger than Fiction Business Travel Magazine Week's End Anglo File Books
Share |
Last update - 03:45 18/12/2009
Israel must not forget the price of nuclear war
By Uri Bar-Yosef
Tags: Israel news

In 1987, Politika, the Israeli journal of political science, issued a special edition under the title "Israel's Nuclear Policy: The Intolerable Weakness of the Debate." Since then, the nuclear issue has become more acute while discussion of the question has totally disappeared.

This is a dangerous situation. The experience gathered during the Cold War, particularly in the United States, shows that while the generals who were entrusted with the new weapon considered it a more effective way to destroy the enemy, civilian experts understood its true significance and developed strategies that prevented it from being used.

The lack of public debate on the most important issue for Israel's security leads to a lack of information that encourages a baseless approach under which there are no differences of opinion on Israel's nuclear policy, nor should there be. This is because the policy is a success story and there is someone to rely on.
Advertisement
This kind of public consensus can be costly; the price of a mistake could be high. That's why it is important to ask questions about the accepted wisdom. Beyond a basic issue like the relevance of the ambiguity policy, the following are examples of reservations about the consensus.

The indispensability of Dimona for Israel's security. In the accepted narrative, Israel's nuclear image has convinced the Arab states not to pose existential threats. But from what is known of the Arabs' concepts about Israel's strength, it turns out that this image has played a marginal role, if any, in shaping their hesitation to threaten Israel's existence. What deterred them, including during the Yom Kippur War, was Israel's conventional military superiority and its strategic alliance with the United States.

On that basis, one can ask a basic but skeptical question: Did Israel even need the bomb that foreign reports attribute to it? Because Israel's image as having nuclear weapons makes it easier for countries like Iran (and Iraq in the past) to make progress in that respect - with the excuse that if Israel is allowed, why aren't they? - one can also ask whether the means designed to prevent an existential threat against Israel (as foreign reports say) makes it possible to create such a threat. Under these circumstances, the theoretical question arises - what is preferable, a regional balance of fear, or removing the nonconventional capability of all countries in the region (including Israel)?

The bombing of the Iraqi nuclear facility was a story of success and salvation. This statement is based on the assumption that the bombing in 1981 did indeed destroy the Iraqi nuclear project. But today, from the testimony of the Iraqi scientists who conducted the project, we know that the opposite was true. The bombing blocked the cautious and slow processing of plutonium, which may or may not have led Iraq to a bomb, and rerouted it to the faster track of enrichment, which was less public but more efficient. It was only Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait and the subsequent war that quelled the effort that could have turned Iraq into a nuclear state within a year or a little more.

It is worth asking what one can learn from this. Did the Begin Doctrine prove itself? Is the best way to deal with the Iranian initiative something similar to that doctrine? What might be the ramifications of an Israeli attempt to destroy the Iranian project with regard to Iran's ability to achieve nuclear weapons and its readiness to use them when it gets them?

Military superiority is a condition for deterring a nuclear Iran. The head of the air force says Israel needs stealth planes to deter Iran. That's a mistaken statement. World history has proved that in a nuclear world, the price of a war is mutual destruction, so the aim is not to achieve military victory but to prevent war. This means that the most important objective is not military supremacy but rather strategic stability. Precisely because the stealth can evade radar, it could make Iran fear a surprise attack; a new dimension of instability would be created in the two countries' relations. In a situation like that, the chance increases that Iranian nuclear weapons would be used by mistake against Israel.

Theoretically the opposite is also true. Since the capability of a second strike, which foreign publications attribute to Israel, contributes to nuclear stability, and since Israel supposedly has such a capability, the Israeli interest must be that Iran also has such a capability. Therefore, no matter how absurd it sounds, the most reasonable thing Israel could do with the submarines Germany is building for it - and which, according to foreign reports, are to serve as platforms for a second strike - is to deliver them to Iran so that, like their counterparts already in service in Israel (as foreign sources report), they will calm Iran's fears about losing its nuclear capability after a surprise Israeli attack. This will contribute to stability.

This logic, of course, is totally contrary to the accepted military logic that Israeli officers and shapers of Israeli policy are used to. That's why the subject must be opened to a public debate in which other voices can be heard.

The writer is a member of the International Relations department at the University of Haifa.
PROMOTION: Mamilla Hotel
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
B'Tselem vs. the IDF
Leftist rights group B'Tselem says IDF may have executed unarmed Palestinians.
Prediction bloopers
Decade in review: Remember Y2K? How about hopes for a hydrogen fuel cell?
  1.   Looney column 05:45  |  dyinglikeflies 18/12/09
  2.   wow...christmas has come early for Uri 06:18  |  rich 18/12/09
  3.   observation 06:18  |  potobac 18/12/09
  4.   Huh?! 06:32  |  Danny 18/12/09
  5.   Unusual but Brilliant 06:33  |  Jimmy 18/12/09
  6.   Wrong premise 06:50  |  Fortuna Benmayor 18/12/09
  7.   We must stop Iran first 07:08  |  Chaim Ben Kahan 18/12/09
  8.   naval blockade of oil exports from Iran would leave her with 07:25  |  sans U235 18/12/09
  9.   Totalitarians 07:47  |  Revitalk 18/12/09
  10.   Iran Already Fears a Pearl Harbor 08:13  |  Mark of Lewiston 18/12/09
  11.   A WMD suicide bomber is what should scare you! 08:27  |  Dave 18/12/09
  12.   Iran`s aims in the quest for nuclear weapons 08:42  |  Cipora Julianna Kohn 18/12/09
  13.   Naval Blockade by U 235 10:04  |  James 18/12/09
  14.   False assumptions 10:19  |  Albrecht Klein 18/12/09
  15.   #8 Israel is the irrational one 11:21  |  Keith T. 18/12/09
  16.   A surprisingly good article, with the second best solution 11:28  |  StephenL 18/12/09
  17.   Excellent point from Uri! 11:59  |  Hildi 18/12/09
  18.   Complete misunderstanding of the issue 12:01  |  Binyamin Dissen 18/12/09
  19.   the concept of logical argument is sadly lacking here 12:10  |  vhardman 18/12/09
  20.   #15 keith and directing us all to peace with iran 12:13  |  vhardman 18/12/09
  21.   World peace would be served by the removal of Israel altogether 12:27  |  Chanalau, Tova 18/12/09
  22.   #12 Jullianna Cipora Kohn 12:36  |  Chris Linthwaite 18/12/09
  23.   Israel has hegemony, Iran wants its share 12:41  |  Roo 18/12/09
  24.   Fortuna`s illogical arguments #6 14:08  |  Si 18/12/09
  25.   Binyamin Dissen You completely misunderstand the issue 14:12  |  Natallie Durson 18/12/09
  26.   silly article, with no real point or possiblity 16:08  |  jon 18/12/09
  27.   9. `Totalitarians`, excuse me... 16:19  |  samos 18/12/09
  28.   What good are nukes? 19:46  |  David Kaiser 18/12/09
  29.   Nukes bring death 21:41  |  Paul 18/12/09
  30.   Finally a good article 22:06  |  louis 18/12/09
  31.   Really??? 22:42  |  Arieka 18/12/09
  32.   Israel is not exactly ignorant of the price 23:00  |  Devasahayam 18/12/09
  33.   Natallie Durson 23:35  |  Ehud 18/12/09
  34.   Louis from Vatican should lead by example 23:38  |  Ehud 18/12/09
  35.   Nagasaki, Hiroshima 01:33  |  Mark of Lewiston 19/12/09
  36.   The indispensability of Dimona for Israel`s security 04:06  |  xexon 22/12/09
Special Offers
Advertisement
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
100% Pure Dead Sea Salt
Lowest price in the U.S.A. for genuine Dead Sea Salts
Award-Winning 'Obsession'
Watch 'Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West' Online FOR FREE!
Protea Hills
A Retirement Village in Nature Nestled in the Foothills of Jerusalem
Date Local Jewish Singles
Ready to meet your match? Join Jdate today!
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
More Headlines
13:08 IDF soldier shot dead by comrade at Be'er Sheva mall
13:31 Netanyahu heads to Egypt, warns Shalit deal may not be possible
14:58 Report: 4 killed at Tehran rally, police refuse orders to shoot
14:58 Hezbollah chief asks Egypt to stop building Gaza border wall
14:26 One year on, Ban bemoans lack of 'durable' Gaza cease-fire
12:58 Was Israel's Gaza offensive worth it?
21:31 Vote for Person of the Decade and you could win a home entertainment system
23:01 TV ROUND-UP: IDF kills Palestinian militants; Livni, Netanyahu to meet
13:00 Despite U.S. rap, Netanyahu says IDF will keep 'aggressively' defending Israelis
10:48 Hamas confirms deaths of two operatives in Beirut bombing
14:46 Netanyahu: Livni should join coalition like Begin did in 1967
09:44 Study: Gap between wages of Ashkenazim, Sephardim growing
02:25 Crumbling Tiberias synagogue to regain its former glory
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Site rules |
| Advert: Recommended Restaurants | Makom: Engaging on Israel
| Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved