Subscribe to Print Edition | Wed., November 18, 2009 Kislev 1, 5770 | | Israel Time: 06:39 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Jewish World Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Focus U.S.A. Strenger than Fiction Business Travel Magazine Week's End Anglo File Books
Share |
Last update - 19:28 07/11/2009
ANALYSIS / How Israel's war with Iran will be fought
By Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondent
Tags: Hezbollah arms ship 

It is precisely from the events of the passing week, which culminated in an impressive show of force reminiscent of the good old Israel Defense Forces - the IDF that carried out Entebbe and bombed the reactors in Iraq and in Syria - that Israel can glean an important lesson about the limitations of the power at its disposal. These are the limitations dictated by U.S. President Barack Obama: Israel's navy can intercept weapons shipments from Iran, Israel's Military Intelligence can expose Hamas long-range missile tests from Gaza, but at least for the time being, as long as the international community is conducting dialogue with Tehran over its controversial nuclear program, it is best that Israel doesn't do too much to annoy the adults.

The interception of hundreds of tons of weapons, believed to be an Iranian shipment meant for Hezbollah, in the Mediterranean on Wednesday wasn't any different from similar operations carried out by the U.S. Navy, twice this year, though Israel seized a significantly larger amount of weapons. Therefore, the display of the loot the IDF invited everyone to see at the Ashdod port on Thursday received a lukewarm welcome by the world media. It is great that Israel is uncovering and seizing Iranian weapons, the world leaders must be telling themselves, but is there anything here that we didn't know well before the Israeli commandos raided the Antigua-flagged ship in the middle of the night?

The execution by Israeli forces was impeccable, that's true. The IDF apparently followed the arms shipment for a long time, identified the correct ship and planned the operation which went off without a hitch. Now comes the part of diplomacy and public relations. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who will be visiting Washington in the coming days, will be accompanied by intelligence officials who will present the details of the operation to their American colleagues, along with all the necessary proof that Iran is continuing to support terror despite Tehran's denials, and in blatant violation of UN Security Council resolutions.
Advertisement

On the public relations front Israel has gained some ground in light of the fact that both the seizure of the arms ship and the exposure of the Hamas missile test occurred right before the United Nations General Assembly debate on the Goldstone report, which accused Israel of having committed war crimes in Gaza last winter. While the IDF is being accused of war crimes, and the Goldstone report argues that the Israeli offensive was designed specifically to punish the Palestinian civilian population, it doesn't hurt to bring to the forefront the background to these allegations: the ongoing Iranian effort to arm terror organizations with rockets meant to kill Israeli civilians.

But, that's approximately it. Israel is allowed to pester Hamas and Hezbollah with intelligence maneuvers, initiate brilliant pinpoint operations, block their supply of weapons and expose Iran and its proxies - and no more. Here is what Israel isn't permitted to do, for now: Israel is forbidden from threatening to attack Iranian nuclear facilities (our leaders have, in an exceptional move, become silent on the issue). Also forbidden are deterrence displays against Hamas and Hezbollah that go beyond the norm. The White House has enough problems without having to pull satellite photos of Palestinian refugee camps in Gaza.

The priorities of the Obama administration are completely different. Besides its long delayed, critical, decision on the war in Afghanistan, the president is also plagued with internal U.S. issues and the erosion of his popularity among the American public. After that, in a high place on the priority list, stands the issue of Iran. Israel's job, right now, is not to interfere. We are apparently headed toward several more weeks of dialogue, and after that, if talks fail, a U.S. move to impose more sanctions on Iran. Only in 2010 will there be an actual assessment of what effect these sanctions will have, and whether it is possible to prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb without resorting to military tactics.

A man who was, up until recently, involved in Israel's decision making process and continues to serve as adviser to many at the helm, said this week that in his opinion, the Israeli leadership should be very careful in formulating an opinion on the dialogue with Iran. He says that the idea of transferring enriched uranium from Iran to Russia is not necessarily a bad idea, and a similar idea was raised five years ago. It was then director of Israel's atomic energy committee Gideon Frank who came up with the idea, and presented it to then prime minister Ariel Sharon. The key, the man says, is in the supervision clauses of the deal. If Iran, in a surprise move, accepts a deal similar to the one it rejected last week, there is definitely room for dialogue.

The IDF must prepare itself for the possibility of an attack against Iran's nuclear facilities because that's the IDF's job. But when the debate among experts and analysts regarding such a scenario revolved around operative questions (will the Americans provide Israel with an airspace corridor over Iran? How many fuel jets will be required? Etc.) it is missing the point. The important question is how willing the U.S. is to protect Israel in the event of a counter attack. The message Israel is getting from Obama's administration at this time is that it is out of the question - and thus the likelihood of an Israeli attack on Iran diminishes drastically.

But how will an Israel-Iran war look if it breaks out eventually? This question is at the center of a new study compiled by the Defense Ministry. Researcher Dr. Moshe Vered writes that such a war could go on for a long time. He believes that the Iranian's typical willingness to sacrifice many victims for a long period of time in a conflict with Israel will dictate a prolonged war between the two states, which will be difficult to end.

Dr. Vered, a physicist, occupies various roles in the defense establishment's technology division. He published his study this week as part of a sabbatical at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar Ilan University. He argues that the length of an Israel-Iran war "will be measured in year, not in weeks or days." This stems from the Shiite perception by which one must fight and sacrifice for the sake of justice and to correct wrongs to Islam and to Muslims. "This outlook sees Israel's existence as a wrong that must be corrected for the sake of world redemption. The achievement of this goal will only be possible once Israel is annihilated. The Iranians will continue fighting this war, as much as it is up to them, until they achieve their objective, despite the heavy toll that will be exacted in battle," Vered writes.

Vered argues further that only the fear the Iranian regime being toppled could bring such a war to an end. But, it seems unlikely that Israel will be able to pose a real threat to the Iranian regime, and "in the absence of a way out, acceptable to both sides, the war could continue for a very long time."

Vered mentions the fact that the Iran-Iraq war, in the 1980s, lasted eight years. Iran fought many years to achieve its demands - to correct the basic wrong of Iraq's invasion into its territory, Iraqi recognition of its culpability, and the removal of the head of the Iraqi regime Saddam Hussein.

Iran paid an inconceivable price in that war - half a million dead and economic damage higher than the country's entire oil income in the 20th century - before it agreed to a ceasefire. The ceasefire came only when there was a real danger that the Iranian regime would not survive.

Vered writes that "one can't rule out with a high degree of certainty the possibility that a war will break out between Israel and Iran." Therefore, a careful assessment of the details of a possible war, and preparation for it, are essential. In his study, he fails to find anyone who could develop an effective method to shorten the time of a war.

He goes on to write that the fear of such a war should prompt Israel to prepare mentally, politically, and militarily, while creating ways to end it quickly, should it erupt. The assumption that the war will become prolonged should affect the way Israel prepares for it, as well it should affect the decision whether or not to attack Iranian facilities in the future.

Vered rejects the assumption that in the absence of a shared border, the Israel-Iran war will be fought only with surface to surface missiles. Such warfare shouldn't last a long time because Iran's supply of long-range missiles isn't large. However, he writes, it is more plausible to assume that Iran will want to continue the fighting against Israel via messengers: Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas, and maybe even an Iranian force on Syrian soil, as part of a defense treaty between Tehran and Damascus. He plays down the likelihood of a short confrontation (Israeli assault followed by a punishing counter assault and then an immediate ceasefire under international pressure while both sides realize that the war has played out), he thinks that the ideology of the Iranian regime will dictate a prolonged war. Yes, this isn't exactly what you would call relaxing reading material for the weekend.

PROMOTION: Mamilla Hotel
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Kosher vampires
Popular books and movies Twilight and New Moon are making vampirism more Jewish
Most popular names
If you were born in 2008, you're likely to be named one of these...
  1.   Consider the alternative 22:05  |  Boaz 06/11/09
  2.   Boaz: Your right & 22:27  |  Brad 06/11/09
  3.   doesn`t a peace deal sound more sensible? 22:27  |  Shelley 06/11/09
  4.   I miss Ze`ev Schiff 22:29  |  Mark Lincoln 06/11/09
  5.   Just don`t start the war. Simple? Jews are geniuses, right? 22:32  |  Lou Medel 06/11/09
  6.   Iranians not into genocide 22:32  |  Neil 06/11/09
  7.   #1, a war will not prevent that, but ensure it 22:33  |  KevinB 06/11/09
  8.   blatant violation of UN Security Council resolutions. 23:07  |  AB 06/11/09
  9.   To Lou - A War Can Be Started by one Side Posing An 23:09  |  Eli 06/11/09
  10.   The so call peace plans, are irrelevant even the one ostensibly 23:17  |  Anthro 06/11/09
  11.   Very sobering 23:18  |  Johnny 06/11/09
  12.   Boaz "Consider the alternative" ...We Already Have!! 23:23  |  Brian L. 06/11/09
  13.   Very sobering - part 2 23:25  |  Johnny 06/11/09
  14.   Do not think about this: 23:30  |  Ethan 06/11/09
  15.   The key question? How much money does Iran have? 23:35  |  Jacob Blues 06/11/09
  16.   Israel`s war would become America`s war 23:38  |  Norman 06/11/09
  17.   of course it does & `everybody` would prefer that, ie most people 23:40  |  ivo 06/11/09
  18.   Isn`t Israel Technically Already At War With Iran? 23:43  |  Bob 06/11/09
  19.   Evil Iran ? 23:46  |  gorm 06/11/09
  20.   ScareMongering? 23:50  |  Mohammad 06/11/09
  21.   Fight against Iran 23:51  |  David Gershon 06/11/09
  22.   Better to absorb conventional missiles now 23:56  |  MARK KLEIN, M.D. 06/11/09
  23.   The key question? How many people could Israel keep? 00:10  |  BDS 07/11/09
  24.   Israeli warmongers 00:15  |  Justice 07/11/09
  25.   Go it alone 00:22  |  bob2 07/11/09
  26.   Pardon my ignorance 00:29  |  Apa 07/11/09
  27.   #9 Eli, the key word is `imminent` 00:36  |  BDS 07/11/09
  28.   Could have been worse 00:39  |  ky 07/11/09
  29.   Of the oil China imports over 15 % come from Iran 00:55  |  Petteri 07/11/09
  30.   longterm war is impossible 01:04  |  mehmet 07/11/09
  31.   The Ally 01:04  |  Hugh 07/11/09
  32.   To shorten a war: massive infrastructure destruction 01:55  |  Joe 07/11/09
  33.   apart from it`s missiles, the Iranian force represents nothing 02:27  |  Joey 07/11/09
  34.   Eli - Uh huh? So let us know when it happens... 02:33  |  CJ 07/11/09
  35.   The one thing the extreme right does not have 02:35  |  Mark Lincoln 07/11/09
  36.   Back the green revolution instead 02:40  |  p. 07/11/09
  37.   What if Iran doesn`t just pack it in? 02:41  |  Mark Lincoln 07/11/09
  38.   War with Iran may go like this ... 03:54  |  no_more_war 07/11/09
  39.   defence may be the key 04:00  |  ky 07/11/09
  40.   US/EU response will to yank Israel back by the chain 04:49  |  binny 07/11/09
  41.   A long war is a better alternative... 07:15  |  Edward 07/11/09
  42.   Attack 07:45  |  Arieka 07/11/09
  43.   There will be no war 07:48  |  Chappaqua neighbor 07/11/09
  44.   #23 BDS 08:48  |  Franco 07/11/09
  45.   in this case israel will warn iran to stop or face nuke arsenal 09:51  |  danny 07/11/09
  46.   The right is talking up a storm here 10:17  |  r cummings 07/11/09
  47.   Massada Complex 10:28  |  Kelly 07/11/09
  48.   17, Ivo - Interested in what you say 10:39  |  r cummings 07/11/09
  49.   Israel has threatened to attack Iran, not vice versa. 10:45  |  Stephen L 07/11/09
  50.   46: R. cummings: flawed analysis 11:20  |  Anthro 07/11/09
  51.   War with Iran 11:29  |  Edward Stern 07/11/09
  52.   Who supports terror? 12:00  |  Jaap 07/11/09
  53.   You`re all missing the point 12:07  |  David M 07/11/09
  54.   #.47. Stephen. L. 12:11  |  Stephen. 07/11/09
  55.   No 1...Boaz 12:20  |  Sohel Saheen 07/11/09
  56.   There is a limit 12:32  |  Yom Tov 07/11/09
  57.   You are all missing the point 12:45  |  A Solomon 07/11/09
  58.   State Insanity = State of Insanity 13:27  |  Susan Trevelyan-Syke 07/11/09
  59.   Israel does not have the conventional capability 13:33  |  Chris Linthwaite 07/11/09
  60.   Charm needed 13:49  |  Nicholas Wibberley 07/11/09
  61.   Already at war 14:25  |  Koppers 07/11/09
  62.   i live in haifa,otherwise i would support strike 14:32  |  yoram carmeli 07/11/09
  63.   Israel can`t do it 15:27  |  Gully Foyle 07/11/09
  64.   stephen the daydreamer 15:42  |  Axel 07/11/09
  65.   Are the settlements worth it? 16:13  |  Richie 07/11/09
  66.   Re #5 Lou Medel: Is there any logic in his posting? - NO 16:16  |  Vittorio 07/11/09
  67.   Solution 17:10  |  Texan 07/11/09
  68.   #62 Gully Foole 17:21  |  *BEN JABO 07/11/09
  69.   # 60 koppers 17:21  |  Axel 07/11/09
  70.   The face of Israel 17:59  |  Fritz T. 07/11/09
  71.   2 days only war! 18:08  |  Andrei 07/11/09
  72.   Israels war 18:16  |  jtli 07/11/09
  73.   Axel und träumerei (#63): 18:27  |  Morris Valentine 07/11/09
  74.   With Friends like #58... 18:28  |  Thom 07/11/09
  75.   Israel will open the gates to hell if it attacks Iran 18:41  |  peacelover 07/11/09
  76.   Hahaha 18:52  |  Axel 07/11/09
  77.   #64 Richie - It has nothing to do with Settlment 19:01  |  *BEN JABO 07/11/09
  78.   #62 Gully Foole - Israel will retaliate 19:03  |  *BEN JABO 07/11/09
  79.   Other factors not mentioned 19:41  |  JW 07/11/09
  80.   if you really want to impress Iran & get international support... 21:22  |  Golda-locks 07/11/09
  81.   How Israel`s war with Iran will be fought 22:17  |  moon 07/11/09
  82.   Never underestimate Israel 22:22  |  Texan 07/11/09
  83.   not too fast : the real battle was not fought 00:24  |  sami abu ismail 08/11/09
  84.   #70 Andrei 00:38  |  Johnboy 08/11/09
  85.   Israel shouldn`t under estimate Iran 01:39  |  John 08/11/09
  86.   #81, MOON, israel over estimating itself 02:18  |  VIPER 08/11/09
  87.   Israel`s death wish 02:22  |  Gully Foyle 08/11/09
  88.   brian l in NY 03:07  |  Mark 08/11/09
  89.   To Axel (#75), who again misses the boat 03:22  |  Morris Valentine 08/11/09
  90.   BDS Iran has been threatening Israel since Mullahs took over 05:29  |  PETER SM 08/11/09
  91.   BDS Iran has been threatening Israel since Mullahs took over 05:29  |  PETER SM 08/11/09
  92.   AXEL the schadenfreud expert on Israeli military capability 05:34  |  PETER SM 08/11/09
  93.   # 89 morris 15:19  |  Axel 08/11/09
  94.   Ship ID 15:36  |  Mike Schuder 08/11/09
  95.   # 92 petersm 16:13  |  Axel 08/11/09
  96.   To Axel (#93): tossing your argument a life preserver 17:42  |  Morris Valentine 08/11/09
  97.   # 96 morris- just for the sake of completeness 18:32  |  Axel 08/11/09
  98.   nuclear-tipped bunker-busters ? 22:03  |  flimflam 08/11/09
  99.   I believe it time 22:34  |  Big Doode 08/11/09
  100.   Squaring Axel`s circle (#97) 00:24  |  Morris Valentine 09/11/09
  101.   #94 Mike Schuder - When`s the last time 01:29  |  *BEN JABO 09/11/09
  102.   The key question? How many people could Israel keep? 02:29  |  Zhu Bajie 09/11/09
  103.   Of the oil China imports over 15 % come from Iran 02:31  |  Zhu Bajie 09/11/09
  104.   #94 Mike Schuder - I`m even more amazed 02:37  |  *BEN JABO 09/11/09
  105.   Just be careful what you wish for 04:21  |  Luke 09/11/09
  106.   Attack on Iran 05:52  |  James 09/11/09
  107.   POINT BLANK - PEACE IS OUT OF THE QUESTION! 15:48  |  Mogend 11/11/09
  108.   War with Iran 05:49  |  joseph davidovic 18/11/09
Special Offers
Advertisement
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Date Local Jewish Singles
Ready to meet your match? Join Jdate today!
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
More Headlines
04:23 Police probing MK over fraudulent West Bank outpost deal
04:04 Netanyahu: Israel is world's 'most threatened country'
05:37 Comment / Why Netanyahu really does want to advance peace
06:32 ANALYSIS / IDF collaborating with rabbis who preach refusal
06:11 ANALYSIS / Netanyahu senses Obama's weakness on Jerusalem
05:23 Intel to employ only non-Jews at Jerusalem plant on Shabbat
06:28 Who are Israel's ultra-Orthodox Jews?
22:55 TV ROUND-UP: Israel disregards U.S. objections, Netanyahu criticizes refusniks
23:37 Peres in Argentina: Ahmadinejad, Chavez will fall
04:24 Jerusalem holds off removing rightists from building in Arab area
04:33 Panel suggests scrapping bereaved parents' consent for combat service
04:46 'Egyptians should read in Hebrew, to know what the enemy is plotting'
05:20 U.S. 'dismayed' at Israel plan to build 900 homes beyond Green Line
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Site rules |
| Advert: Recommended Restaurants | Makom: Engaging on Israel
| Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved