Subscribe to Print Edition | Fri., June 26, 2009 Tamuz 4, 5769 | | Israel Time: 02:53 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Focus U.S.A. Travel Week's End Anglo File
Share |
Lawbreakers in the Supreme Court
By Gideon Levy
Tags: settlers, Supreme Court 

Would we want a lawbreaker to be a Supreme Court justice? Or a justice hobnobbing with lawbreakers? The danger of this happening is closer than ever. There is a reasonable chance that transgressors and their cohorts will enter the temple - three candidates to the beacon of justice are settlers. Judge Noam Sohlberg is from Alon Shvut and his legal assistant Ariel Erlich is from Ofra, most of whose lands were robbed from private owners. Judge Issaiyaho Schneller is from Karnei Shomron and Professor Dov Frimer is from Ma'aleh Adumim.

The land they live on has been plundered by either fraud or violence. In many cases this is private land that does not belong to them, in settlements whose very establishment is a violation of international law. It was their ideological choice to live in a region of lawlessness, violence and crime, as aptly described in the Sasson Report - an official Justice Ministry paper adopted by the cabinet.

It's not hard to guess how these candidates would rule on issues such as preserving human rights in the territories, severe transgressions by the Israel Defense Forces and the land plundering and violence by their friends, the settlers.
Advertisement
There have never been settlers on the Supreme Court, and for good reason. Now a path has been opened for them. We can start missing Daniel Friedmann - the revolution his heir Yaakov Neeman is leading is infinitely more dangerous to the rule of law. But Friedmann, who mostly talked, drew fire from all directions, while Neeman, who mostly acts, has hardly anyone speaking out against him. The "sons of light" who fought Friedmann have fallen silent in the face of Neeman's acts.

In the Knesset on Tuesday, National Union chairman Yaakov Katz was heard addressing the new justice minister in a tone that could be construed as threatening: "Let him remember where he came from, where he was raised, whom he represents, what movement he was in, and act accordingly."

The Supreme Court now appears to be the settlers' next illegal outpost. They will get their wish, nothing will stop them. This couldn't happen in a state of law.

We're not talking about the candidates' opinions or religion - those have a place on the Supreme Court. It's not their skullcaps that threaten the rule of law, but the bulldozer that built their illegal homes. The fact that they are settlers automatically disqualifies them from a judge's position.

There is no difference between the late Yaakov Alperon's horse farm, land he invaded and which was evacuated a few weeks ago, and the settlers' illegal invasion of West Bank lands. But while nobody could have imagined appointing land squatter Alperon a judge - Sohlberg, Frimer and Schneller are legitimate candidates. This is possible only in a state with two justice systems.

These men were not nominated for their superior legal qualities. None of them is an outstanding jurist. They are only candidates because they represent the West Bank settlements. That's what you get when National Union MK Uri Ariel of Kfar Adumim is the opposition's representative in the Judicial Appointments Committee, and Yisrael Beiteinu's David Rotem of Efrat is the coalition's representative. After all, this is the only reason they were elected to the committee.

But the complaints should not be aimed at them. They're doing all they can, according to their political strength. The problem is, as usual, the silent majority enabling all this. After Israel set up double systems, one in Israel and the other in the territories - here a democratic state of law, there a brutal dictatorial regime without any legal supervision - and is living in peace with it, is it any wonder the settlers are legitimate candidates?

Had Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch been courageous enough, she would have stood up and said the Supreme Court has no place for lawbreakers - and the settlers are lawbreakers.

Even so, the Supreme Court has its share of severe defects. It has systematically betrayed its duty in its verdicts on the occupation. For years it postponed hearings on crucial petitions, from tortures by the Shin Bet security service to assassinations, and evaded making a stand against the settlements. When the day comes the Supreme Court will be remembered as a full partner to the Israeli occupation.

But now its makeup is about to change. From now on not only judges who legitimize the occupation will be on it, but the settlers themselves, serial offenders by any accepted standard. Can this still be called a state of law?
PROMOTION: Mamilla Hotel
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Three years, no Shalit
WATCH: People around world read in various languages Gilad's tale of coexistence.
Demilitarized Palestine
After meeting EU leaders, PM insists controversial plan for peace will gain support.
Special Offers
Advertisement
hotel Jerusalem
David Citadel Hotel, come stay at the finest of Jerusalem hotels.
ISRAEL ARMY SURPLUS STORE
IDF insignia,Uniforms, Paladium Boots Watches, Israel Army T-shirts & Collectibles
Dead Sea Skin Care
Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off!
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
More Headlines
00:06 Gilad Shalit transfer to Egypt imminent
23:42 U.S. praises Israel for easing West Bank restrictions
23:51 'Decision makers must grant my son's only wish - his freedom'
02:09 King of Pop Michael Jackson dies at 50
14:46 IN PICTURES / Gilad Shalit - three years in captivity
22:24 Hamas chief welcomes Obama approach to Mideast, but wants to see action
21:47 Israeli sources: IDF to limit West Bank raids
20:53 Lieberman slams U.S. on Iran, settlements
21:14 Ex-U.S. official: Bush agreed to Israel settlement construction
20:58 WATCH: Daily news round-up from Israel
22:30 Ahmadinejad: Obama like Bush, must apologize for Iran comments
20:46 Sharansky sworn in as Jewish Agency chief
20:46 18-year-old charged with killing man just for being an Arab
13:56 Exclusive: Leonard Cohen to perform in West Bank as well as Israel
18:16 230 Israeli lecturers vow not to obey law banning Nakba commemoration
17:11 Nixon administration pressured Israel on nuclear program, papers reveal
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Site rules |
| Israel 2009 election results | Makom: Engaging on Israel
| Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved