Subscribe to Print Edition | Sat., May 09, 2009 Iyyar 15, 5769 | | Israel Time: 16:19 (EST+7)   Back to Homepage web haaretz.com Haaretz Toolbar Diplomacy Defense Jewish World Opinion National Print Edition Car Rental Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Focus U.S.A. Travel Week's End Anglo File TLV 100

Last update - 02:57 04/05/2009 Understandings before a clash By Ephraim Sneh Tags: Israel News, Barack Obama  Glimmers of concern have recently crept into conversations with various American officials about a possible clash between the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government. On the one hand, the U.S. president has reiterated his intention to implement an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement based on the existence of two independent states. On the other hand, official voices in the Israeli government are heralding an attempt to evade, thwart or at least delay such a move. Engaging the Americans in "arm-wrestling" will not help. Ultimately, Israel is a democratic country where the Knesset makes the decisions. The agreement that Obama speaks of contains unavoidable components: withdrawal from 96 percent of the West Bank, the transfer of the Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to Palestinian rule, a special arrangement for the holy places. It is very doubtful whether a majority will be found in the present Knesset to approve such an accord. Harsh outside pressure might lead to new elections, which under the circumstances will not result in a definite change in the parliament's balance of power. And above all, there is the Iranian issue: Addressing it requires coordination and full understanding between Israel and the United States - not tension and conflict. This entanglement may be unraveled by means of a "package of understandings" between Israel and the United States, which will ensure tangible progress toward the establishment of a Palestinian state, and will serve the shared interests of both America and Israel in the face of an Iran heading toward nuclear power. Advertisement In the framework of this package, Israel would undertake five pledges: to institute a total, monitored freeze on construction in settlements and of roads connecting them; to allow expansion of activities aimed at developing Palestinian security services and deploying them in all cities in the West Bank; to remove obstacles to economic development in the West Bank, so as to make possible establishment of industrial zones and export of products; to refrain from making further restrictions on Palestinian freedom of movement in the West Bank (that is, rejecting pressure by settlers to restore checkpoints removed during the tenure of the previous government); and to allow Palestinian Authority rule to return to the Gaza Strip and the border crossings if and when Hamas' rule ends. The United States, for its part, would pledge to limit its dialogue with Iran to a reasonable period of time, and not to include acceptance of Tehran's demand to recognize it as a hegemonic player in the Middle East. If this dialogue does not bring about an end to the manufacture of nuclear weapons and support for terror, the U.S. would lead a move toward serious economic sanctions: an embargo on the sale of distillates, a ban on the entire Iranian financial system, and punishment of companies that invest in the Iranian energy industry and provide it with replacement parts. Moreover, the United States would take part in the development of Israeli anti-missile and rocket programs without any connection to America's annual military assistance, and in a form and to an extent that would accelerate completion of - and allow Israel to incorporate its own technology and weaponry in - the new F-35 aircraft. The package of understandings would defuse the danger of an Israeli-American clash. On the one hand, it would ensure the economic and security infrastructure of the Palestinian state. On the other, tangible economic sanctions would undermine the regime of the ayatollahs, and Israel would not find itself facing the Iranian threat alone, and would therefore not be forced by lack of choice to act alone. In any case, Israel's ability to protect its civilian population from the threat of heavy rockets and ballistic missiles would be improved, and effective defense is also a necessary condition for offensive action. The writer is a former health minister, transportation minister and deputy defense minister. Bookmark to del.icio.us   'Unfair Gaza probe' Peres tells Ban that Israel will never accept UN's conclusions on its Gaza war conduct. Arab fears on Iran U.S. allies in the Gulf are worried over Obama's diplomatic overtures to Tehran.   1.   Understanding 04:56  |  Edward 04/05/09   2.   thought 10:20  |  potobac 04/05/09   3.   EDward 13:15  |  virtu 04/05/09   4.   forget it... 15:32  |  ravi 04/05/09   5.   Curious. And nothing conditional on Palestinian behavior. 20:18  |  Raymond in DC 04/05/09   6.   Destroying the meaning of peace 20:40  |  Frank 04/05/09   7.   stop iran threat: accept arab league basics 21:47  |  dolphin 04/05/09   8.   Edward`s dead on 14:41  |  Tired 09/05/09

Read & React Breakdown of Mideast coordination with U.S. worries J'lem Responses: 267 Netanyahu: Israel will never withdraw from Golan Responses: 145 Arieli: Palestinians will recognize Israel as a Jewish state under a final-status deal Responses: 51 U.S. incorporating Livni's ideas into peace process Responses: 38 More Headlines 15:25 Pope: Catholic Church and Jewish people united by 'inseparable bond' 11:47 Obama renews U.S. sanctions on Syria 16:04 Hezbollah: UN envoy biased in favor of Israel 19:13 Netanyahu: Israel will never withdraw from Golan 21:40 ANALYSIS / Netanyahu is beginning to look worried 13:28 Sadat's widow: Israel would be attacking Egypt if not for peace treaty 12:17 The adventures of 'Milton' - Nazi spy in Eretz Israel 21:58 WATCH: Daily news round-up from Israel 07:51 Obama to deliver speech to Muslim world in June 15:09 19 hurt, 1 seriously, during altercation in southern town of Rahat 08:22 UN team prepares to investigate alleged Gaza war crimes 12:06 Moderate Iranian presidential candidates register for election 11:17 Lebanese rights group fights to overturn law banning homosexuality Previous Editions Select Day 08 may 07 may 06 may 05 may 04 may 03 may 01 may 30 apr 29 apr 28 apr 27 apr 26 apr

Special Offers Advertisement Spring Specials-Dan Hotels Jerusalem from 179$. Tel-Aviv from 223$. Herzliya from 336$ The Meier on Rothschild Tower Masterpiece Residence in the Heart of Tel Aviv Dead Sea Skin Care Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off! Camp Kimama Israel 2009 The best place for your children this summer Eldan Rent a Car Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations Jewish Singles Personal Ads Find the love of your life on JDate.com Junkyard Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt

Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | | Israel 2009 election results

Site rules | Makom: Engaging on Israel | Search engine marketing

Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.

© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved