Subscribe to Print Edition | Wed., February 18, 2009 Shvat 24, 5769 | | Israel Time: 02:15 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Joy of Giving Travel Week's End Anglo File
The Bottom Line / The mendacity of the mutual funds industry
By Eytan Avriel
Tags: israel news

Are mutual funds coming back into fashion? After the 10% rebound by Israeli equities in January, in utter contrast to the ceaseless inundation of frightening news on the economic front, the public is starting to sidle back to mutual funds.

Initial figures for February indicate that the public withdrew several hundreds of millions of shekels from the safe harbor of money-market funds and put more than NIS 1.5 billion into mutual funds specializing in both stocks and bonds.

To be sure, the public's steps remain slow and tentative, but you can't argue with the numbers, or the conclusion: The appetite for risk is returning.
Advertisement
Before you phone the bank and start comparing mutual funds, you should note a study recently published in the Journal of Finance by two researchers hailing from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid: Javier Gil-Bazo and Pablo Ruiz-Verdu: "The Relation between Price and Performance in the Mutual Fund Industry."

Gil-Bazo and Ruiz took data on actively managed equity mutual funds in the United States from 1961 to 2005. They aimed to find out whether there was any correlation between a fund's performance (how much it makes for investors) and the level of its management fees.

Hundreds of studies had already concluded that actively managed mutual funds don't usually beat the indexes, so why investors continued to invest in them rather than in cheaper vehicles such as exchange-traded funds and index funds remained unclear.

But Gil-Bazo and Ruiz uncovered another conundrum. They found that on average, the worse the fund's returns (before deduction of fees), the higher the fees it charged.

Sound weird? It is. Logic would dictate that funds that do best could afford to charge the most, not the reverse.

Did the two researchers simply make a mistake? Their finding certainly flew in the face of economic logic. So they retested their findings, more stringently, and came up with the same clear result.

They sat down and thought about it, and came up with some theories to explain the anomaly.

Here's one: Mutual funds that know that their past performance is terrible raise management fees based on the realization that their clients evidently aren't sensitive to these fees.

In other words, bad mutual funds (by the test of performance over the past seven years) know perfectly well they can't compete over investors who have a clue. Their clientele are investors who haven't a clue, and therefore, they can afford to jack up their fees.

Then there's the marketing theory. Funds with a bad past performance have to invest more in marketing and sales, and have to pass these higher costs onto their clients.

To be frank, bad funds have no choice but to sell themselves to suckers - people who understand nothing and don't ask inconvenient questions.

Gil-Bazo and Ruiz studied the American market. What is the situation here? Well, a glance at local equity funds, mainly the ones that charge high fees, doesn't give me the warm fuzzies.

Looking at their returns over two and five years shows that most equity funds aren't beating the indexes. That goes for the funds that charge the most, too. So on what basis do their managers of 50 out of 161 equity funds allow themselves to charge fees of 3% of assets a year?

Maybe they think that the public is willing to pay higher fees to invest in equity funds because they figure the managers are working harder. But that's silly. Managing a fund that specializes in corporate bonds is just as labor-intensive, requiring just as much research and analysis.

Maybe the managers of the equity funds think that since the stock market is so volatile, nobody will even notice fees amounting to 3% a year.

Or maybe Israeli clients are just like American ones and don't check the facts.

Maybe they make decisions on what the next-door neighbor, cousin Yossi or the taxi driver says, or maybe they believe that fine-looking actor in the television ad. And you, ladies and gentlemen? On what basis did you choose your mutual fund?
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Calm before the storm
Obama officials meet U.S. Jews to explain their Durban II policy.
Apple of their eye
Israel resumes its annual shipment of Golan apples to Syria.
 Read & React
Is Israel assassinating Iran nuclear scientists?
Responses: 94
Bradley Burston: Sure the Israeli right won? Peace lost? Look closer
Responses: 47
Barak tells IDF: Iran nukes are an existential threat to Israel
Responses: 31
Akiva Eldar: A rightist coalition will be on collision course with Obama from day one
Responses: 45
Yitzhak Laor: Left's demise began with support for Barak's war on Palestinians
Responses: 12
'Palestinian Authority strongman once called Lieberman key to peace'
Responses: 15


More Headlines
23:00 IDF: Hamas seized unexploded ordnance fired during Gaza op
01:10 U.S. ex-envoy to Israel: Netanyahu-Lieberman gov't is 'bad combination' for U.S.
23:45 Assad: Gaza offensive won't derail our peace talks with Israel
21:37 Shalit family: Gilad can be saved - don't turn him into Ron Arad 2
18:17 Is Israel assassinating Iran nuclear scientists?
22:02 Obama officials meet U.S. Jews to explain their Durban II policy
01:33 Key U.S. Jewish groups praise Obama's economic stimulus plan
02:07 Livni: Likud can't buy Kadima with promises of ministerial jobs
23:32 'Say 'nyet' to Lieberman,' leftist U.S. Jews urge Kadima, Likud
20:04 Israel resumes annual shipment of Golan apples to Syria
21:57 Colombia frees 11 Israelis jailed over alleged drug-for-sex deal
14:40 Report: Iran seeking Russian missiles to repel Israeli assault
20:56 Tennis Channel boycotts Dubai event after Israel's Peer barred
21:34 UN watchdog: Iran not cooperating fully with probe of its nukes
21:19 Hamas leader Meshal: No Shalit deal before Gaza truce
08:49 ANALYSIS / A rightist coalition will be on collision course with Obama from day one
18:46 Lawyer guilty of Holocaust cash fraud to be jailed at once due to flight risk
23:01 Labor No. 2: Neither Netanyahu nor Livni could forge coalition
21:17 Shas chief Yishai: Israel must free Jews jailed for nationalistic crimes
13:06 Majadele: Arabs likely to quit Labor if Barak remains leader
17:38 Egyptian army conducts series of war games on Sinai Peninsula
Previous Editions
Special Offers
Advertisement
Spring Specials-Dan Hotels
Jerusalem from 179$. Tel-Aviv from 223$. Herzliya from 336$
Dead Sea Skin Care
Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off!
Summer in Israel
Israeli style - Tzofim Chetz V'Keshet 2009
Passover Vacations
The BEST Passover Vacations around ? Mexico, Arizona and Florida
Camp Kimama Israel 2009
The best place for your children this summer
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Jewish Singles Personal Ads
Find the love of your life on JDate.com
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | | Israel 2009 election results
Site rules | Makom: Engaging on Israel | Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved