Subscribe to Print Edition | Tue., March 24, 2009 Adar 28, 5769 | | Israel Time: 10:48 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Joy of Giving Travel Week's End Anglo File
Last update - 01:54 18/01/2009
The war as warm-up act for Obama
By Gershom Gorenberg
Tags: hamas, israel news, israel 

The diplomatic timing for the war looked lovely. The U.S. president who loved military action was still in power, though fading into the shadows. The new president, dynamic and popular, hadn't yet entered office. There was no one to interfere, to pressure us to stop.

We don't know if the Olmert-Livni-Barak triumvirate deliberately picked that window of opportunity. If so, it already looks like another of the war's mistakes - perhaps the only welcome miscalculation. For instead of preventing American involvement, their decision to go to war on the eve of Barack Obama's inauguration may well force him to intervene in the Israeli-Palestinian arena and push for a diplomatic solution.

In recent months, foreign-policy experts from Obama's camp have debated whether there's any point in a new peace initiative. Robert Malley, known as the most dovish veteran of Bill Clinton's peace team, has written - surprisingly - that such an effort is hopeless. In an article in the New York Review of Books (written with Hussein Agha), Malley argues that the weakness of Israel's leadership and the Palestinian political rift will prevent a two-state solution at present. Arguing the opposite, former ambassador Martin Indyk - who is likely to join the Obama administration - writes in Foreign Affairs of the "urgent need for a diplomatic effort." The Middle East can't be ignored, say Indyk and co-author Richard Haass. It will "force itself onto the U.S. president's agenda."
Advertisement
The Gaza War proves Indyk's thesis. After the years of neglect under Bush, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has blown up again, on Obama's doorstep. Grim photos appear in the media. Relations between Israel and Turkey, both American allies, are crumbling. While careful not to conduct foreign relations before the inauguration, Obama promised last week that his team would become "immediately engaged in the Middle East peace process." At her confirmation hearing for secretary of state, Hillary Clinton spoke of the "tragic humanitarian costs" borne by Gazans and of the incoming administration's "determination to seek a peace agreement."

Any serious American initiative requires pressure on both sides. Conventional wisdom says that a new president won't risk public confrontation with Israel - particularly not a Democrat president, who is more dependent on Jewish votes. But conventional wisdom may no longer be valid. Despite all the political right's attempts to paint Obama as anti-Israel, he received 78% of the Jewish vote. Voting Democratic is regarded as simply part of Jewish identity.

While public support for Israel continues, blind support for hawkish Israeli policies can no longer be assumed, even among Jews. J Street, the new, dovish pro-Israel lobby, exceeded expectations in raising funds for congressional candidates. Jews are among the pundits calling for a more balanced American approach. New York Times columnist Roger Cohen has written recently of feeling despondent and shamed by the war in Gaza. Matthew Yglesias, an influential young blogger, has called for public American pressure on Israel to freeze settlement. The disqualification of the Arab political parties is likely to increase the discomfort of liberal Jews. So are the prime minister's boasts of his ability to change the American vote in the Security Council, which seemingly confirm claims that Israel controls U.S. policy.

In such circumstances, Obama can reasonably hope to build political support for an assertive diplomatic initiative. Since outside pressure is necessary to disentangle Israel from the territories, this is a positive development - even if the triumvirate didn't think for a moment that it would be a consequence of the war's wonderful timing.
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Military in denial
IDF chief Ashkenazi refuses to believe IDF troops harmed Gaza civilians in cold blood.
Coalitional contention
Labor demands chairmanship of key Knesset committee promised to Lieberman.
  1.   The same stupid `Pressure Israel` mantra 11:29  |  Shalom Freedman 18/01/09
  2.   Obama should know this 13:14  |  V.R.Sonti 18/01/09
  3.   Gershom Gorenberg offers a spark of hope 13:19  |  sh 18/01/09
  4.   Another prespective 13:34  |  a 18/01/09
  5.   The Veep was right 14:25  |  Mark Lincoln 18/01/09
  6.   Obama`s inaugural dish of red herring served up by Israel 14:25  |  Ivar 18/01/09
  7.   Obama is not needed for a solution. 14:31  |  US CITIZEN 18/01/09
  8.   MMmmmmf Thinking... 14:53  |  Yosemite 18/01/09
  9.   #1 Shalom F. 19:24  |  Adam 18/01/09
  10.   Will Obama Make A Tough Demand That Settlement Expansion Stops? 21:26  |  chet 18/01/09
  11.   Obama enters the ME stage 00:11  |  Bruce 19/01/09
  12.   BO has many issues on his plate, Israel taking care of itself 00:19  |  PK 19/01/09
  13.   JUST WAIT 06:00  |  indrajaya 19/01/09
  14.   Ivar - Annapolis is based on the Saudi Initiative 08:58  |  Reid 19/01/09
  15.   Hamas 16:33  |  M. Simon 19/01/09
  16.   Obama and ME progress 18:37  |  The Wise Bard 19/01/09
  17.   Obama or not this is enough 09:28  |  Redneck 20/01/09
  18.   J Street is a Suaid front 03:38  |  Lee Kaplan 13/02/09
  19.   Israelis may not care what American Jews think... 10:43  |  Michal 24/03/09
 Read & React
Bradley Burston: Why does the world media love to hate Israel?
Responses: 70
Amira Hass: Time to believe Gaza war crimes allegations
Responses: 31
Police gird for rightist march through Arab town
Responses: 15
Moshe Arens: Israel paid high price for little achievement in Gaza
Responses: 11


More Headlines
10:47 Israeli Arabs, police clash near far-rightist march
10:20 Barak, Netanyahu agree on draft coalition deal
04:15 'It's natural for Barak to join a rightist government'
07:16 Time to believe Gaza war crimes allegations
06:17 'Slumdog Millionaire' star in Israel filming Julian Schnabel movie
05:20 Soldiers: Drunk reservists vandalized West Bank cars
04:24 Can look-alikes ease the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
23:11 WATCH: Daily news round-up from Israel
07:48 Film on IDF to explore 'melting pot' forced on immigrants
06:42 Israel paid high price for little achievements in Gaza
09:45 Man seriously hurt after shot at close range in Rehovot market
23:49 New bill seeks to worsen conditions of incarceration for terrorists
22:02 Ultra-Orthodox pressure Lieberman to yield on conversion reform
Previous Editions
Special Offers
Advertisement
Spring Specials-Dan Hotels
Jerusalem from 179$. Tel-Aviv from 223$. Herzliya from 336$
Dead Sea Skin Care
Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off!
Camp Kimama Israel 2009
The best place for your children this summer
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Jewish Singles Personal Ads
Find the love of your life on JDate.com
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | | Israel 2009 election results
Site rules | Makom: Engaging on Israel | Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved