Subscribe to Print Edition | Sun., December 28, 2008 Tevet 1, 5769 | | Israel Time: 01:46 (EST+7)   Back to Homepage web haaretz.com Haaretz Toolbar Diplomacy Defense Jewish World Opinion National Print Edition Car Rental Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Joy of Giving Travel Week's End Anglo File

If it walks like a sovereign ... By Geoffrey Aronson Tags: Barack Obama, Israel News The incoming administration of Barack Obama has carefully guarded its intentions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Yet the appointment of Gen. James Jones as national security advisor offers much more than informed speculation about policies the new administration will follow. One indication of the direction Obama will take may be the assessments Jones made as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's special security envoy to the Annapolis conference in 2007. Jones' experience since then has led him to three conclusions that will be instructive for future U.S. policymakers. First, that Hamas - not Israel - presents the most immediate, existential threat to the Palestinian Authority led by Mahmoud Abbas, and that the most effective means of combating it is via a strategy of counter-insurgency. Second, that the model of Palestinian leadership and confrontation with Israel now evolving in Gaza is best ignored in favor of the Annapolis model, which focuses on enabling economic achievements in the West Bank and the growing effectiveness of Palestinian security forces. And third, that in any future agreement, Israel's security needs in the territories can be addressed by complete withdrawal of its forces and their replacement by third-party troops - from NATO, for example. Without a change in attitude toward Hamas, or a dramatic revision of the assumptions underlying the Annapolis process, however, it is unlikely that the Obama administration will enjoy greater success than its predecessors. On the other hand, a sober assessment of Israel's security requirements, as completed by Jones, can provide the basis for local progress in the context of efforts to establish a new system of regional security. Advertisement Hamas and the PA today see each other as their most immediate threat, not Israel. Jones' views support and reflect this reality. Each, ironically, views Israel as a (potential) partner in the contest over Palestinian leadership. For Hamas, the dialogue being conducted with Israel in and around Gaza is dramatically different from the one in which Abbas is engaged. Both, however, have similar objectives: Hamas wants to force Israel to concede that it is its most formidable Palestinian enemy; Abbas, to convince Israel that it is its most reliable Palestinian partner. Realpolitik, not unfocused sentiment, is driving the complex Israel-Hamas relationship - which is remarkably absent from the formulations of U.S. policymakers. The challenge to Palestinians framed by Rice at Annapolis, and articulated by Jones, was to "follow us" - Abbas, the West and, by association, Israel - "not them," namely, Hamas. Israel, by this model, would enable modest improvements in the Palestinian economy and security forces, and thus restore Fatah's supremacy, reduce Hamas' popularity and decimate its civic and terror infrastructure. These positive developments would in turn convince Israel to expand the PA's power and functionality, reduce its own security footprint, and produce tangible diplomatic progress toward ending the occupation. Meanwhile, Gaza would experience the calamitous consequences of the policy of economic deprivation engineered by Israel and the PA, with international support, and furious Gazans would make Hamas pay for its refusal to play according to the Annapolis rules. Jones' involvement in this policy has been central to its implementation. There have been few dissenting views about its effectiveness - one was from the World Bank, which noted last week that the policy's economic benefits on the West Bank have yet to materialize. On the security front, Israeli officials remain profoundly skeptical about significantly reducing the IDF's freedom of action throughout the West Bank, no matter how well the Palestinian security elements supported by Washington perform. Washington, though, is marching to a different drummer on this issue, confident that Israel will rethink the assessment that produced Operation Defensive Shield in April 2002 and the army's reoccupation of the entire West Bank. Diplomatically, the return to engagement is an important achievement, but its failure is also instructive. Notwithstanding its obvious drawbacks, the Hamas model for ending occupation maintains its attraction. Hamas rule in Gaza is exhibiting undeniable characteristics of sovereignty: no settlements or permanently stationed Israeli forces, independent control over a territorially unified area, a (now expired) cease-fire with Israel, a border not under Israeli control, and the beginnings of a seaport - achievements of which Abbas can only dream. As Prime Minister Salam Fayyad warned Secretary Rice during her visit to Jenin in November, the purpose of the Annapolis process was not to beautify the occupation, but to end it. Jones has thought deeply about constructing an architecture for peace and security after the occupation ends, settlements are evacuated, the Israeli army retreats to recognized borders, and a Palestinian state is established. In his paper to Rice, he reportedly noted with favor the possibility of employing NATO forces to secure the peace. But time is running out for the scenario favored in Washington. Without an Israeli-Palestinian agreement, there will be no peace for third-party troops to keep. As the promise of Annapolis fades, the Hamas model, for all of its weaknesses, increasingly dominates Israel's calculations. For all of its failings, Hamas is meeting the test of a liberation movement, while Abbas and his movement grow weaker, in no small measure because of their association with the policy of counter-insurgency. The road that Abbas has taken since Annapolis shows no sign that it will lead to Palestinian independence and sovereignty in an environment that enhances Israeli security. Doing more of the same and hoping for a different outcome was Einstein's definition of insanity. It is certainly not a prescription that addresses anyone's interest, except those who profit from failure and misery. Geoffrey Aronson is director of the Foundation for Middle East Peace, in Washington, D.C. Bookmark to del.icio.us   'shock and awe' Israel's strike on Gaza is the closest thing there is to a war with Hamas. Looking for support As it confronts terror, Israel expects understanding of the international community.

Read & React At least 225 dead, over 780 hurt in IAF Gaza strikes Responses: 228 Palestinian rocket accidentally kills 2 young Gaza girls Responses: 131 ANALYSIS / A hard look at Hamas' capabilities Responses: 95 Israelis voice horror at rejection of Arab child from Jewish daycare Responses: 124 Report: Iran preps humanitarian aid ship to Gaza Strip Responses: 96 Benjamin Weinthal: Berlin conference dangerously equates anti-Semitism with Islamophobia Responses: 78 More Headlines 01:36 IDF mobilizes tanks, reinforces troops along Gaza border 01:33 After IAF strike kills 225 in Gaza, Hamas chief vows third Intifada has come 00:24 Disinformation, secrecy and lies: How the Gaza offensive came about 21:41 ANALYSIS / IAF strike on Gaza is Israel's version of 'shock and awe' 00:27 One Israeli killed, 4 hurt as Palestinian rockets hit Negev home 21:01 Bradley Burston / The worst anti-Israel charges you'll hear in wartime 23:36 IN PICTURES / The Gaza Strip under attack 21:43 U.S. demands Hamas end terrorist acts, urges Israel to avoid civilian casualties 22:48 Israeli Arabs react with violence to IDF operations in Gaza 21:45 Israel to mount emergency international PR effort in wake of Gaza campaign 21:46 Palestinian rocket accidentally kills 2 young Gaza girls 07:26 Report: Iran preps humanitarian aid ship to Gaza Strip 11:48 Peres: Israel has no plans to enter Gaza, won't ignite regional war 10:20 Arab journalist blasts Egyptian FM for failing to censure Livni Gaza threats 22:23 Israeli Arab party meets leftist Palestinian faction led by convicted terrorist 01:40 Elie Wiesel charity vows to fight on despite being swindled in Madoff affair Previous Editions Select Day 26 dec 25 dec 24 dec 23 dec 22 dec 21 dec 19 dec 18 dec 17 dec 16 dec 15 dec 14 dec

Special Offers Advertisement Summer in Israel Israeli style - Tzofim Chetz V'Keshet 2009 SURF RAMBAM Keep current about new-wave medical care, education and research. Summer Camp in Israel The best place for your children this summer Academic Studies in Israel All the Q & A at the IDC HERZLIYA Open House, January 9,2009 Fattal Hotel Chain Perfectly located hotels on best resorts of Israel. Car rental in Israel Shlomo Sixt Receive $15.00 from our low rates. Eldan Rent a Car Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on all online reservations Jewish Singles Personal Ads Find the love of your life on JDate.com Hebrew Summer courses From $39.95 Junkyard Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt

Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Underground | Site rules |

Real Estate in Israel | Travel to Israel with Haaretz | Hotels Israel | Restaurants Israel | Tourist attractions Israel | Shops Israel

birthright Israel | Search engine marketing

Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.

© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved