Subscribe to Print Edition | Tue., April 07, 2009 Nisan 13, 5769 | | Israel Time: 16:32 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Joy of Giving Travel Week's End Anglo File
Archeologist Yossi Garfinkel displaying a ceramic shard bearing Hebrew inscription at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. (AP)
Last update - 00:00 30/10/2008
Have Israeli archaeologists found world's oldest Hebrew inscription?
By The Associated Press
Tags: Israel News, Beit Shemesh 

An Israeli archaeologist digging at a hilltop south of Jerusalem believes a ceramic shard found in the ruins of an ancient town bears the oldest Hebrew inscription ever discovered, a find that could provide an important glimpse into the culture and language of the Holy Land at the time of the Bible.

The five lines of faded characters written 3,000 years ago, and the ruins of the fortified settlement where they were found, are indications that a powerful Israelite kingdom existed at the time of the Old Testament's King David, says Yossi Garfinkel, the Hebrew University archaeologist in charge of the new dig at Hirbet Qeiyafa.

Other scholars are hesitant to embrace Garfinkel's interpretation of the
f
Advertisement
inds, made public on Thursday. The discoveries are already being wielded in a vigorous and ongoing argument over whether the Bible's account of events and geography is meant to be taken literally.

Hirbet Qeiyafa sits near the city of Beit Shemesh in the Judean
foothills, an area that was once the frontier between the hill-dwelling Israelites and their enemies, the coastal Philistines. The site overlooks the Elah Valley, said to be the scene of the slingshot showdown between David and the Philistine giant Goliath, and lies near the ruins of Goliath's hometown in the Philistine metropolis of Gath.

A teenage volunteer found the curved pottery shard, 15 centimeters by 15 centimeters, in July near the stairs and stone washtub of an excavated home. It was later discovered to bear five lines of characters known as proto-Canaanite, a precursor of the Hebrew alphabet.

Carbon-14 analysis of burnt olive pits found in the same layer of the site dated them to between 1,000 and 975 B.C., the same time as the Biblical golden age of David's rule in Jerusalem.

Scholars have identified other, smaller Hebrew fragments from the 10th century B.C., but the script, which Garfinkel suggests might be part of a letter,
predates the next significant Hebrew inscription by between 100 and 200 years. History's best-known Hebrew texts, the Dead Sea scrolls, were penned on parchment beginning 850 years later.

The shard is now kept in a university safe while philologists translate it, a task expected to take months. But several words have already been tentatively identified, including ones meaning judge, slave and king.

The Israelites were not the only ones using proto-Canaanite characters, and other scholars suggest it is difficult - perhaps impossible - to conclude the text is Hebrew and not a related tongue spoken in the area at the time. Garfinkel bases his identification on a three-letter verb from the inscription meaning to do, a word he said existed only in Hebrew.

"That leads us to believe that this is Hebrew, and that this is the oldest Hebrew inscription that has been found," he said.

Other prominent Biblical archaeologists warned against jumping to conclusions.

Hebrew University archaeologist Amihai Mazar said the inscription was very important, as it is the longest proto-Canaanite text ever found. But he suggested that calling the text Hebrew might be going too far.

"It's proto-Canaanite," he said. "The differentiation between the scripts, and between the languages themselves in that period, remains unclear."

Some scholars and archeologists argue that the Bible's account of David's time inflates his importance and that of his kingdom, and is essentially myth,
perhaps rooted in a shred of fact.

But if Garfinkel's claim is borne out, it would bolster the case for the Bible's accuracy by indicating the Israelites could record events as they happened, transmitting the history that was later written down in the Old Testament several hundred years later.

It also would mean that the settlement - a fortified town with a 10-meter-wide monumental gate, a central fortress and a wall running 700 meters in circumference - was probably inhabited by Israelites.

The finds have not yet established who the residents were, says Aren Maier, a Bar Ilan University archaeologist who is digging at nearby Gath. It will
become more clear if, for example, evidence of the local diet is found, he said: "Excavations have shown that Philistines ate dogs and pigs, while Israelites did not."

"The nature of the ceramic shards found at the site suggest residents might have been neither Israelites nor Philistines but members of a third, forgotten people," he said.

"If the inscription is Hebrew, it would indicate a connection to the Israelites and make the text one of the most important texts, without a doubt, in the corpus of Hebrew inscriptions," Maier said. "But it has great importance whatever the language turns out to be," he added.

Saar Ganor, an Israel Antiquities Authority ranger, noticed the unusual scale of the walls while patrolling the area in 2003. Three years later he interested Garfinkel, and after a preliminary dig they began work in earnest this summer. They have excavated only 4 percent of the six-acre settlement so far.

Archaeology has turned up only scant finds from David's time in the early 10th century B.C., leading some scholars to suggest his kingdom may have been little more than a small chiefdom or that he might not have existed at all.

Garfinkel believes building fortifications like those at Hirbet Qeiyafa could not have been a local initiative: The walls would have required moving 200,000 tons of stone, a task too big for the 500 or so people who lived there. Instead, it would have required an organized kingdom like the one the Bible says David ruled.

Zionism has traditionally seen archaeology as a way of strengthening and explaining the Jewish claim to Israel, and regarded David's kingdom as the glorious ancestor of the new Jewish state. So finding evidence of his rule has importance beyond its interest to scholars.

The dig is partially funded by Foundation Stone, a Jewish educational organization, which hopes to bring volunteers to work there as a way of teaching them a national and historical lesson.

"When I stand here, I understand that I'm on the front lines of the battle between the Israelites and the Philistines," said Rabbi Barnea Levi Selavan,
the group's director. "I open my Bible and read about David and Goliath, and I understand that I'm in the Biblical context."

While the site could be useful to scholars, archaeologist Israel Finkelstein of Tel Aviv University urged adhering to the strict boundaries of science.

Finkelstein, who has not visited the dig but attended a presentation of the findings, warned against what he said was a revival in the belief that what's written in the Bible is accurate like a newspaper. That style of archaeology
was favored by 19th century European diggers who trolled the Holy Land for physical traces of Biblical stories, their motivation and methods more romantic than scientific.

"This can be seen as part of this phenomenon," Finkelstein said.

Related articles:
  • Islamic-era skeletons 'disappeared' from Elad-sponsored dig
  • Unique glass mosaic unveiled after restoration in Caesarea
  • Archeologists find 3,000-year-old beehives in ancient city's ruins in N. Israel
    • Bookmark to del.icio.us  
     
    Fighter for peace
    Gaza doctor whose three daughters were killed during Gaza op gets Nobel nomination.
    Determined diplomacy
    Obama: U.S. 'strongly supports' two-state solution, vows to continue peace process.
      1.   An old pot 14:36  |  Phil Ishmael 30/10/08
      2.   More Pseudo Biblical Nonesense 15:14  |  MIKE 30/10/08
      3.   Proper Terms 15:19  |  Archaeology Student 30/10/08
      4.   phil ishmael 15:22  |  andy 30/10/08
      5.   Archaeology and the story of Moses. 15:35  |  Michael 30/10/08
      6.   #4 Michael 17:06  |  Boycott 30/10/08
      7.   2. Many Biblical accounts have been verified by archeology 17:25  |  Rob AA 30/10/08
      8.   4. It`s alphabet, not language, that is early. 17:35  |  Rob AA 30/10/08
      9.   Rob AA is right 18:15  |  Gili 30/10/08
      10.   Israelites vs Hebrews vs Jews? 18:17  |  Richard S 30/10/08
      11.   Weren`t chariot wheels found in the Red Sea? 18:33  |  jk 30/10/08
      12.   # 6 rob 18:34  |  Axel 30/10/08
      13.   What do Zionist archeologists due with T Rex bones? 18:35  |  John 30/04/09
      14.   Finkelstine is an Apostate who has been proven wrong 18:37  |  Dr Levy 30/10/08
      15.   #9 Richard 18:42  |  Shoshannah 30/10/08
      16.   Rob AA I`m afraid you`re wrong. 18:44  |  Michael 30/10/08
      17.   One interesting sidenote about haaretz` coverage 18:45  |  Arie 30/10/08
      18.   What`s the BIG DEAL? 18:47  |  Ralph 30/10/08
      19.   BC vs BCE 19:28  |  yitz 30/10/08
      20.   John I am Amazed. 19:57  |  Golani 30/10/08
      21.   Big Deal? There Indian Vedas that are older 4-5K 20:11  |  Archeologist 30/10/08
      22.   Let`s think about that. 20:28  |  Colin Wright 30/10/08
      23.   So Says Mike (#2) 20:38  |  Gil 30/10/08
      24.   9 Richard to complete what Shoshana said 21:20  |  Simon 30/10/08
      25.   Mike 2 and 15 should read the article again 21:39  |  Realist 30/10/08
      26.   To No. 22 21:59  |  ex-kibbutznik 30/10/08
      27.   Yitz, its sounds better in Yiddish 22:46  |  Zev Davis 30/10/08
      28.   Richard, its the same people, with diifferent names 23:01  |  Zev Davis 30/10/08
      29.   Golani: Zionists have never dug up one Dinosaur 00:37  |  John 31/10/08
      30.   #13 Dr Levy 01:10  |  Boycott 31/10/08
      31.   The argument goes like this: 01:39  |  Axel 31/10/08
      32.   30Axel You make up a straw man. Thats not what was said. 02:31  |  Rob AA 31/10/08
      33.   # 9 Richard S - Israelites vs Hebrews vs Jews? 09:20  |  17 31/10/08
      34.   Axel, I don`t know about vampires in . . . 10:23  |  Zev Davis 31/10/08
      35.   JESUSALEN 21:45  |  cristian 01/11/08
      36.   gil re albright 19:39  |  potobac 02/11/08
      37.   simon 19:42  |  potobac 02/11/08
      38.   Hebrew and Arabic Languages derive from... 18:20  |  John Duff 12/11/08
      39.   Oldest Hebrew Inscriptions 06:36  |  Morah Deborah 15/11/08
      40.   the Arabs came from Arabia during the MOSLEM invation 01:28  |  Zvi 30/11/08
      41.   BC vs BCE 06:48  |  US Citizen 21/12/08
      42.   maharat hamacpela... 20:03  |  Mordechay Landman 16/02/09
      43.   Aramiac also... 21:06  |  rigma 16/02/09
      44.   Well, it`s very simple... 18:52  |  messy 06/04/09
     Haaretz Hot Topics
    Air strike in Sudan
    Israel 2009 election results: Voter breakdown
    Conflict in Gaza
    Israel vs. Hamas
    Iran: Nuclear and regional ambitions
    More Headlines
    16:11 Palestinian killed after attacking officers at home of Jerusalem terrorist
    15:03 Israel test fires Arrow missile defense system
    13:28 Haaretz exclusive: Obama to visit Israel, West Bank in June
    12:10 ANALYSIS / Obama speech heralds end of 'axis of evil' era
    14:58 Olmert to court: Defer hearings in graft cases against me
    15:33 'It's not easy being an Ethiopian Jew in America'
    16:24 Lieberman questioned for third time since becoming foreign minister
    11:13 WATCH: Daily news round-up from Israel
    14:07 Obama's Turkey address draws praise across Middle East
    08:24 ANALYSIS / Obama saying Israel still bound to two-state solution
    08:31 Pesach gift-giving has robbed us of our freedom
    08:59 Galilee family holds out hope for son missing in Italy quake
    08:25 IDF keeps Bedouin trackers in dark about Egypt border ops
    08:42 Security officials may be barrier to Netanyahu's 'economic peace'
    09:17 Knesset approves two-year state budget
    Previous Editions
    Special Offers
    Advertisement
    Spring Specials-Dan Hotels
    Jerusalem from 179$. Tel-Aviv from 223$. Herzliya from 336$
    Dead Sea Skin Care
    Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off!
    Camp Kimama Israel 2009
    The best place for your children this summer
    Eldan Rent a Car
    Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
    Jewish Singles Personal Ads
    Find the love of your life on JDate.com
    Junkyard
    Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
    Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | | Israel 2009 election results
    Site rules | Makom: Engaging on Israel | Search engine marketing
    Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
    © Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved