Subscribe to Print Edition | Sun., September 14, 2008 Elul 14, 5768 | | Israel Time: 01:44 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
  Back to Homepage
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Easy Start Travel Week's End Anglo File
Browser Wars II
By Harold James
Tags: google, explorer

Ten years after its birth, Google is threatening to re-open the "Browser Wars" of the 1990s, when Microsoft's Internet Explorer eliminated its rival, Netscape's Navigator. This time, however, it is Google's Chrome that promises to transform the economics underlying the entire software industry. This is not only because of its technical innovation in linking very different kinds of software to an Internet browser, something that eliminates the need for a program such as Windows, which previously controlled access to every kind of software.

Google's new technology is impressive, and will no doubt prove convenient for many consumers once the initial security problems are resolved. But the fundamental innovation lies elsewhere. Chrome offers a completely novel approach to a dilemma created by the legal and regulatory regime of competition policy in the world's two major legal jurisdictions, the United States and the European Union.

Between 1995 and 1997, Explorer almost completely eradicated Navigator, even as Navigator's dominance had for a time appeared unassailable. Explorer's major advantage was not so much a technical one, but rather that Microsoft's Windows provided the operating software for the overwhelming majority of personal computers. As a result, an Internet browser - and, indeed, other media software - could be integrated into the Windows framework as an entire software package.
Advertisement
Having operating systems and software bundled together made life much easier for the average consumer. You simply got everything you wanted (and probably much more) with the purchase of a computer. But this also reduced the possibility of choice, of selecting and combining different software. Microsoft's critics have complained endlessly that the browser's integration into the operating system drove out inherently superior software solutions.

For instance, many users preferred the word-processing program WordPerfect to Microsoft's Word, but the ease of having a bundled solution meant that Word had the advantage of being used more widely, and thus drove its rival into extinction.

Microsoft's advantage, and its business model, goes back to another protracted legal struggle. Computer software was originally not a commodity to be bought, but a service. IBM built up a massively dominant position because it leased a carefully custom-designed and individualized package. It did not sell anything - computers or software. IBM's leasing model seemed to challenge the entire legal philosophy of U.S. competition policy that was established in the New Deal era.

In line with the philosophy of challenging dominant positions, the U.S. Department of Justice in 1969 started a major investigation of IBM, which had just revolutionized business computing with its 360 line. The case dragged on until 1982, when it was dismissed as being "without merit." But so long as the anti-trust case remained a threat, IBM was nervous, and began to back away from its business model. Microsoft's current position is a direct outcome of the old anti-trust case pushed against IBM.

When IBM launched its personal computer, it could easily have bundled it together with its own operating software, and in this way maintained its dominance. But, worried that American authorities would accuse it of attempting to control a new market, IBM left the disk operating system (DOS) for its new PCs to a tiny new company that no one saw as a threat: Microsoft.

Of course, Microsoft ran into its own legal troubles when it took over IBM's former dominant position, waging long drawn-out court cases on both sides of the Atlantic. The EU, which has looked increasingly to the U.S. model for competition law, began proceedings against Microsoft in 1993. The U.S. started only after Microsoft's victory in the browser wars, with a case beginning in 1998. Initially, both cases went decisively against Microsoft, with a U.S. ruling in 2000 that would have required the company's break-up, although this was subsequently overturned on appeal.

Google's position is so interesting and so powerful because the legal philosophy that challenges any ascendant position, even in an industry that seems to naturally produce monopoly, remains in place. Leasing software and hardware, as IBM initially did, is problematic. But so is selling computer services on a one-time basis, in the manner of Microsoft. By contrast, on the face of it, there cannot be anything wrong with offering services or products for free, and then simply using the resulting advertising possibilities.

Google's model is a neat example of what might be termed "post-modern economics." The amazing story of technical innovation is that it was, and remains, hard for innovators to benefit from radical technological breakthroughs. Industrial Revolution-era cotton makers in England did not make a great deal of money, even though their products revolutionized personal life and hygiene, and even extended life expectancy.

In our own time, air travel has become much cheaper, but airlines lose money; telephoning is no longer unaffordable, but the telecommunications companies lost fortunes by over-bidding for mobile telephony rights. Google has taken the logic of loss-making technology to its ultimate culmination of not charging for its product at all.

Harold James is professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University, and professor at the European University Institute, Florence. His most recent book is "The Roman Predicament."

Copyright Project Syndicate, 2008.
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
'I didn't kill Rose'
Rose's mother, grandfather request court delay autopsy of body found in Yarkon River.
Israeli requests
Israel asks U.S. for arms and permission to use an air corridor to attack Iran.
 Read & React
Palin: U.S. shouldn't 'second guess' Israeli defensive measures
Responses: 274
Ahmadinejad: Iran will support Hamas until collapse of Israel
Responses: 186
Antony Lerman / The bogus concept known as Jewish 'self-hatred'
Responses: 79
Abbas to Haaretz: Peace deal would have to include right of return
Responses: 157


More Headlines
23:46 West Bank villager: Settlers went from house to house firing at random
22:33 Peace Now: Revoke gun licenses of settlers who attacked Palestinians
21:03 Report: Palestinian teen shot dead in clashes with IDF
23:17 U.S. court reviews ruling in killing of American teen in West Bank terror attack
21:30 Iran basketball team quits Paralympics, possibly over match against Israel
17:55 Hitler wax figure back on display months after head wrenched off
09:36 ADL: Religious groups' plan to break bread with Ahmadinejad is a 'betrayal'
09:15 Fayyad: World support for peace is meaningless unless Israel halts settlement expansion
20:59 Kadima MK Ben-Israel: Barak is Israel's worst minister ever
10:41 Forensic experts identify body found in Yarkon River as Rose Pizem
16:11 Egypt draws up plan to end internal Palestinian crisis
21:49 Hurricane Ike downgrades to tropical storm, moves north through Texas
Previous Editions
Special Offers
Advertisement
Fattal Hotel Chain
Perfectly located hotels on best resorts of Israel.
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on all online reservations
Jewish Singles Personal Ads
Find the love of your life on JDate.com
Israel's Premier Real Estate Website
www. israel-property.com
Hebrew Summer courses
From $39.95
ISRAEL BONDS Build Israel
Israel bonds - a multi-purpose way to celebrate Israel's 60th
Junkyard
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | Underground | Site rules |
Real Estate in Israel | Travel to Israel with Haaretz | Hotels Israel | Restaurants Israel | Tourist attractions Israel | Shops Israel
birthright Israel | Search engine marketing
Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved