Subscribe to Print Edition | Sun., September 14, 2008 Elul 14, 5768 | | Israel Time: 17:09 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
web haaretz.com
  Back to Homepage
Haaretz Toolbar
Diplomacy
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Easy Start Travel Week's End Anglo File
A casually deployed radar system
By Aluf Benn
Tags: Iran, Israel

Significant strategic changes often occur surprisingly quietly, without drawing the deserved attention. A clear example of this is the agreement last month for the deployment of a U.S. radar system in the Negev, which will bolster Israel's defense against Iranian or Syrian surface-to-surface ballistic missiles.

The radar deployment will have historical significance: the first American base on Israeli territory. Israel has always had reservations about such a possibility and preferred to "defend itself by itself" and retain maximum freedom of action. This time the deployment will be for the long term. The radar will be operated by civilians employed by the company that builds the system, contracted by the Pentagon, and by two U.S. soldiers. Military sources say that in the future the system will be handed over to the Israel Defense Forces. Until then, if it happens, an American flag will fly in the Negev.

Anyone who tries to attack Israel with missiles will consider the radar a priority target. Anyone attempting such a strike will have to take into account the likelihood of harming the American crew, and the implications of such an action. This will increase Israel's deterrence, to a certain extent.
Advertisement
Israel, too, will have to take into account the risk to the lives of the American radar operators, if it decides to strike the Iranian nuclear installations or strategic targets in Syria. Israel will not be able to take action without early and explicit approval from the White House. The minute the base in the Negev is set up, it will be like handcuffs on Israel's freedom of action.

In the current circumstances, the radar deployment, planned to take place in the coming months, has two possible meanings. One: a signal to Israel not to attack Iran. The prime minister and defense minister had asked U.S. President George W. Bush for an offensive means of attack and were turned down, getting the defensive system as a consolation prize. Israel will not be able to neutralize the threat against it, experts quipped, but at least it will be more aware of when it is being attacked.

The second meaning is less likely, but should not be ignored: The United States is planning to attack Iran, or to back an Israeli strike, and it is preparing Israel's defenses against a possible Iranian response. The radar deployment will make it easier to deploy American defensive missiles in Israel during an emergency, as the United States did in 1991 and 2003. Could the U.S.-Israel missile-defense exercise scheduled for the fall actually be a cover for a surprise attack against Iran's nuclear installations?

All these questions and their implications have not been discussed in the cabinet, security cabinet or Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and have received almost no mention in the media. Even the battle for political credit - who got the system for Israel, Ehud Barak or Ehud Olmert - was less intense than expected.

The decision to deploy the radar was unusual. It reminds one of "Charlie Wilson's War," a film about a congressman who funded the mujahideen in Afghanistan against the Soviets and equipped them with arms from Israel. It all began with the private initiative of Mark Kirk, a Republican congressman from Chicago and an ardent supporter of Israel, who spent time as a reservist in the U.S. Navy's command center during the Second Lebanon War, when Israel's performance caused him grave concern.

The defense establishment was not thrilled about the American radar and sidelined the idea. It was brought up again when officials in Jerusalem considered possible "parting gifts" from Bush. The Pentagon promised to bolster the radar's deterrent capabilities by linking it to a satellite system that Israel had been kept out of, and the Defense Ministry agreed.

Kirk, who is facing a major challenge in his run for a fifth term, followed the process and rallied for it in Washington. Kirk believes that if Israel attacks Iran, the U.S. must assist.

Once more, an important security-related decision was made in the most casual manner, without the necessary political and public oversight. The defense establishment considered the radar deployment a technical-operational issue, and the political aspects were discussed, in the best-case scenario, behind closed doors at the Defense Ministry. In-depth assessments and inter-ministerial preparations proposed by the Winograd Committee investigating the Second Lebanon War were absent in the decision making.

Now the discussion will move to a committee on planning and construction. The radar requires extensive and costly cement infrastructure, lots of electricity, is as loud as an industrial plant, and emits a great deal of radiation. It is possible to guess that its deployment will be approved, despite the environmental implications, and it will be set up and operated. Hopefully the operators will enjoy better conditions than what the American operators currently experience in Japan. In that case, it took more than a year before they received permanent showers and toilets.
Bookmark to del.icio.us  
 
Troubled teens
Among 10th graders, 8% of Jews, 18% of Arabs have attempted suicide.
Meeting halfway
PA President Abbas concedes a peace deal will include a compromise on refugees.
  1.   Israeli Territory? 14:07  |  David James Vickery 28/08/08
  2.   I have a shower 14:33  |  Sharona 28/08/08
  3.   Israeli Territory! 15:04  |  ATLAS 28/08/08
  4.   David James Vickery 15:11  |  Steven 28/08/08
  5.   Good move, however long awaited. 15:15  |  Harvey 28/08/08
  6.   definition of Israeli territory and #4 15:30  |  chris 28/08/08
  7.   Hi David 15:40  |  Hisham 28/08/08
  8.   David NO.1 15:45  |  lady from USA 28/08/08
  9.   Israel doesn`t have a satellite? 15:51  |  lady from USA 28/08/08
  10.   What happens if the Iranians miss the 2 U.S. soldiers...... 16:32  |  Swiss (Dino) 28/08/08
  11.   the CIA has a base outside Jericho 16:32  |  SD 28/08/08
  12.   silly conclusions 16:39  |  rob 28/08/08
  13.   israel does not have a satellite 16:45  |  bouf 28/08/08
  14.   A crying shame 16:59  |  Ze`ev 28/08/08
  15.   Hisham... Native American territory is... 17:23  |  ZISD 28/08/08
  16.   American politicians used to "sell" Israel as... 17:29  |  ManintheMiddle 28/08/08
  17.   Google Sattelites 17:34  |  Moshe 28/08/08
  18.   Don`t you people read Haaretz? 17:39  |  Veritas 28/08/08
  19.   #1 David J. Vickery - Where the Radar will be 17:52  |  * BEN JABO 28/08/08
  20.   Little completion to my # 10...... 18:03  |  Swiss (Dino) 28/08/08
  21.   #13 Bouf goes Poof 18:17  |  * BEN JABO 28/08/08
  22.   Swiss (Dino) 18:48  |  David Israel 28/08/08
  23.   Thank you for the satellite information 19:01  |  lady from USA 28/08/08
  24.   Swiss (Dino) #20 By the way you are sitting in the same boat too 19:06  |  Gil 28/08/08
  25.   It shows that Israel lost its realities--USA base 19:11  |  Sal 28/08/08
  26.   I thought the U.S. made it perfectly clear 19:13  |  Helm of Chelm 28/08/08
  27.   David James Vickery, look at a map produced in all but Arab 19:30  |  steve-NYC 28/08/08
  28.   How those radar should work 19:36  |  Dr D 28/08/08
  29.   Is this "base", the 3 men in a trailer we discussed the other day 20:16  |  Clickfool 28/08/08
  30.   ISRAELI , CFR, and HaSHEM`S TERRITORY, 20:18  |  Barry S Roffman 28/08/08
  31.   "Deterrence" catches my eye. 21:16  |  christoph 28/08/08
  32.   Israeli action already limited - radar is a boon 21:48  |  Jacob 28/08/08
  33.   Atlas - borders 22:33  |  Palestinian Brit 28/08/08
  34.   Weve come a long way....backwards. 22:43  |  Stephen 28/08/08
  35.   28. Clickfool. Yep. 22:51  |  Stephen 28/08/08
  36.   Swiss (Dino) You know what you convinced me 22:53  |  Gil 28/08/08
  37.   9. Lady from the USA. 23:12  |  Stephen 28/08/08
  38.   #13 bouf 00:02  |  Moshe 29/08/08
  39.   #20 Swiss(Dino) 00:27  |  Moshe 29/08/08
  40.   #30 Palestinian Brit 00:31  |  Moshe 29/08/08
  41.   # 22 David Israel 00:57  |  Swiss (Dino) 29/08/08
  42.   # 24 / 33 Gil 01:06  |  Swiss (Dino) 29/08/08
  43.   Casual? LOL 01:08  |  Jim 29/08/08
  44.   #3 ATLAS 01:13  |  Jim 29/08/08
  45.   #3 ATLAS 01:13  |  Jim 29/08/08
  46.   #31 Stephen 01:15  |  Moshe 29/08/08
  47.   Are you reading this article, PETER SM???? 01:56  |  Johnboy 29/08/08
  48.   #1 David Vickery: in Quebec !!! 02:29  |  pj 29/08/08
  49.   320 Swiss....any more shredding of docs going on? 02:32  |  Lynn 29/08/08
  50.   Don`t Depend on America for Things You Can Do Yourself 02:59  |  UsedToPostHere 29/08/08
  51.   CIA 03:00  |  Paul 29/08/08
  52.   I would not like it if Isreal were ... 03:00  |  Edith 29/08/08
  53.   David Jessica Vickery Porker 03:05  |  Israeli Territory 29/08/08
  54.   Palestinian Brit--Borders #30 04:32  |  ATLAS 29/08/08
  55.   An American Base Facilitates the US Defense of Israel 06:27  |  MIKE 29/08/08
  56.   Cris on Green Line 06:53  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  57.   uhmLady 06:55  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  58.   Dino`s smelly number 2 07:00  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  59.   bouf on satellites? 07:07  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  60.   Helm on nukes 07:14  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  61.   Pal Brit on borders 07:23  |  zengeos 29/08/08
  62.   america and israel.... 08:02  |  ravi 29/08/08
  63.   This radar system look just like USS Liberty 08:52  |  Rod 29/08/08
  64.   Another Entangling Alliance.. uhh, don`t you all read your Torah 12:42  |  Paula 29/08/08
  65.   # 49 Lynn 15:17  |  Swiss (Dino) 29/08/08
  66.   # 39 Moshe / # 58 zengeos 15:21  |  Swiss (Dino) 29/08/08
  67.   #33 Palestinian Brit - Why the silence? 17:33  |  * BEN JABO 29/08/08
  68.   #53 Promised Land? 17:04  |  David Koene 14/09/08
 Read & React
Abbas to Haaretz: We will compromise on refugees
Responses: 95
U.S. to sell Israel Air Force new bunker-buster bombs
Responses: 125
Medvedev to Haaretz: Attack on Iran will endanger entire world
Responses: 51