I don`t understand the reasoning behind this article`s suggestions. Do mean to tell me the author is recommending a non-aggression pact, with whom? "Palestine," Hammas, Islamic Jihad, Muslum brotherhood, Iran? All of them? This will work as well as every other pact and agreement signed between the parties. Then again there is no difference between the PA and Hammas uis there? The only thing they are fighing about now is who`s going to get the responsibility to kill Israelis.
UN "troops" in Jerusalem? For what? To ignore the terror? To prevent Israel from defending herself? Just look how well they`ve worked on the Suez and in Lebanon. They`ll work just as well in Jerusalem. A UN flag flying over Jerusalem? Please! |
|
